Cemetery as a heterotopia
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2026-3-100-117
The cemetery phenomenon has a multiplicity of meanings that arise at the level of everyday life, as well as in the relationship between the hypostases of human existence—life and death (vital and thanatal). It is important to explore the phenomenon of cemeteries as heterotopias. As a basis, Michel Foucault’s concept of heterotopia is taken. Its meaning lies in the restructuring of space, in which there occurs a change in certain meanings associated with the existence of the cemetery. It is shown that the basis of the cemetery’s heterotopia should be sought in the semiosis of the subject’s life and death. To achieve this aim, the following tasks are consistently addressed: the actualization of the cemetery’s polyfunctionality, which presupposes its interpretation in terms of the ambiguity of the corresponding meanings; a review of sources dealing with issues of the vital and thanatal, life and death as the main semiotic structures of the cemetery as heterotopia; a theoretical and methodological justification for interpreting the cemetery in terms of its heterotopia; and an analysis of possible semantic shifts in interpretations of the cemetery phenomenon from the standpoint of the semiosis of life and death. The methodological support of the research involves a set of methods used in the field of visual semiotics and the semiotic field of social and humanitarian research. In particular, in relation to the study of the cemetery as a heterotopia, the following methods and analytical procedures are chosen: the method of studying the visual world, semiotic diagnostic procedures, as well as methods used to identify the properties of real and conditional spaces. The key approaches include the provisions of the semiotic, hermeneutic, and frame approaches. The material for the study consisted of images of active cemeteries in Arlington (a military cemetery), St. Louis III Cemetery in New Orleans, and others. The main results of the study show that the analysis of such a semiotic structure as a cemetery in the aspect of heterotopia significantly expands the possibilities of visual semiotics, since its optimum is achieved in revealing complex, multilayered phenomena in semantic expression—a category that should include the cemetery. Its meanings can replace or overlap each other, depend on the structuring of space, and correlate with everyday life. However, the main perspective for the study of the cemetery as a heterotopia is the semiosis of the vital and thanatal. The scientific novelty of the conducted research lies in the formation of a conceptual perspective of visual semiotics that approaches the cemetery phenomenon not so much as a cultural phenomenon with its own pronounced ethnonational specificity, correlated with specific traditions and rituals, but rather as a heterotopia that changes people’s ideas about the boundaries of life and death in existence.
Keywords: heterotopia, cemetery, semiosis of life and death, vital and thanatal, semiotic structure
References:
Amanik, A., & Fletcher, K. (2020). Till Death Do Us Part: American Ethnic Cemeteries as Borders Uncrossed. University Press of Mississippi.
Ariès, F. (1992). Chelovek pered litsom smerti [Man before death]. Progress-Progress-Akademiya.
Belyaeva, M. A., & Osadchaya, E. K. (2025). Kladbishcha kak mesta pamyati: mediaprezentatsiya i kul’turnoe znachenie [Cemeteries as places of memory: media presentation and cultural significance]. Upravlenie kul’turoy, 4(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.70202/2949-074X-2025-4-1-10-1
Biddle, S. (2004). Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton University Press.
Bloch, M., & Parry, J. (1982). Death and the Regeneration of Life. Cambridge University Press.
Eco, U. (2026). Zaklyatie satany. Khroniki tekushchego obshchestva [Exorcism of Satan. Chronicles of fluid society] (Y. Ar’kova, I. Bochenkova, et al., Trans.). AST: CORPUS.
Elias, N. (1985). The Loneliness of the Dying. Blackwell.
Elkins, J. (2010). Issleduya vizual’nyy mir [Investigating the visual world] (A. Denishchik, S. Lyubimov, O. Pirozhenko, et al., Trans.). EHU.
Foucault, M. (2006a). Drugie prostranstva [Other spaces]. In Intellektualy i vlast’: Izbrannye politicheskie stat’i, vystupleniya i interv’yu [Intellectuals and power: Selected political articles, speeches and interviews] (Part 3, pp. 191–204) (B. M. Skuratov, Trans.). Praksis.
Foucault, M. (2006b). Rozhdenie sotsial’noy meditsiny [Birth of social medicine]. In Intellektualy i vlast’: Izbrannye politicheskie stat’i, vystupleniya i interv’yu [Intellectuals and power: Selected political articles, speeches and interviews] (Part 3, pp. 79–107) (B. M. Skuratov, Trans.). Praksis.
Goffman, E. (2003). Analiz freymov: esse ob organizatsii povsednevnogo opyta [Frame analysis: essay on the organization of everyday experience]. Institut sotsiologii RAN.
Halbwachs, M. (2007). Sotsial’nye ramki pamyati [Social frameworks of memory] (S. N. Zenkin, Trans.). Novoe izdatel’stvo.
Hockey, J., Kellaher, L., & Prendergast, D. (2007). Of grief and wellbeing: Competing conceptions of restorative ritualization. Anthropology & Medicine, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470601106079
Indrianingrum, L., Yuliastuti, N., & Ratih, S. (2023). Cemetery Kampung: Spatial characteristics and exploration of identity. Journal of Urban Culture Research, 26(1), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.14456/jucr.2023.15
Jacobsen, M. H., & Teodorescu, A. (2024). Death loves to be represented: Death, dying, and palliative care in popular culture. In The Routledge Handbook of Health Communication and Popular Culture (pp. 113–126). Routledge.
Jakobson, R. (1987). Raboty po poetike: perevody [Works on poetics: translations]. Progress.
Jaszczak, A., Pochodyła-Ducka, E., & Śliwa, M. (2025). Cultural, social, and axiological dimensions of cemetery space: a comparative analysis of selected world necropolises. Space & Form, (64), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2025.64.D-01
Kellaher, L., Prendergast, D., & Hockey, J. (2004). Resistance, renewal or reinvention: the removal of ashes from crematoria. Pharos International, 70(4), 10–13.
Lotman, Yu. M. (1999). Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek – tekst – semiosfera – istoriya [Inside thinking worlds. Man – text – semiosphere – history]. Yazyki russkoy kul’tury.
Lotman, Yu. M. (2002). Dinamicheskaya model’ semioticheskoy sistemy [Dynamic model of semiotic system]. In Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury i iskusstva [Articles on semiotics of culture and art] (pp. 38–57). Akademicheskiy proekt.
Lübbe, H. (2016). V nogu so vremenem. Sokrashchennoe prebyvanie v nastoyashchem [In step with time. Shortened stay in the present] (A. Grigor’ev & V. Kurenny, Trans.). HSE.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2022). Semioticheskaya diagnostika rasshchepleniya traektoriy mechty o proshlom i mechty o budushchem [Semiotic diagnostics of the splitting of trajectories of the dream of the past and the dream of the future]. Elektronnyy nauchno-obrazovatel’nyy zhurnal “Istoriya”, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840021199-7
Miller, D., & Rivera, J. (2006). The cemetery and the creation of place. Space and Culture, 9(4), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206292450
Mokhov, S. V., & Zotova, V. A. (2017). Delo ob ograde, stolike i skam’e: rezhimy spravedlivosti v praktikakh raspredeleniya mest na kladbishche [The case of the fence, table and bench: regimes of justice in practices of allocating places in the cemetery]. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noy politiki, 15(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.17323/1727-0634-2017-15-1-21-36
Morris, C. W. (2001). Osnovaniya teorii znakov [Foundations of the theory of signs]. In Semiotika: Antologiya [Semiotics: Anthology] (2nd ed., pp. 45–97). Akademicheskiy Proekt; Delovaya kniga.
Nora, P., Ozouf, M., de Puimege, J., & Winock, M. (1999). Frantsiya-pamyat’ [France-memory]. SPbSU.
Rugg, J. (2000). Defining the place of burial: what makes a cemetery a cemetery? Mortality, 5(3), 259–275.
Storchak, A. A. (2025). Atmosfera mesta: novyy podkhod k issledovaniyu kladbishch (keys Kalitnikovskogo kladbishcha) [Atmosphere of place: new approach to cemetery research (case of Kalitnikovskoye cemetery)]. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki, 10(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.17323/ usp101202587-98
Summers, D. (2003). Real spaces: world art history and the rise of Western modernism. Phaidon Press.
Sztompka, P. (2007). Vizual’naya sotsiologiya. Fotografiya kak metod issledovaniya [Visual sociology. Photography as a research method] (N. V. Morozova, Trans.). Logos.
Todorov, T. (1998). Teorii simvola [Theories of symbol] (B. Narumov, Trans.). Dom intellektual’noy knigi, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo. “”
Winkel, M., Siedhoff, M., & Wintzer, J. (2024). Shifting values at the cemetery–the artistic interventions of DeathLab. Geographica Helvetica, 79(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-79-51-2024
( 1.88 MB ) 
( 1.86 MB )
Issue: 3, 2026
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 100 — 117
Downloads: 67