“Dance choreography” and “films of thoughts”, or on the reasons for the absence of a universally recognised dance notation
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2026-2-212-235
Musical notation has enjoyed universal recognition for centuries, whereas dance notation has remained comparatively underdeveloped and conceptually challenging. As a kinetic and embodied art form, dance requires a system of notation capable of reflecting its visual, affective, and technical dimensions while at the same time meeting the normative demands of stage practice. The first serious attempt to systematize a language of dance—bringing together steps, positions, and gestures—was undertaken in 1700, when the French choreographer Raoul-Auger Feuillet published his treatise Chorégraphie ou l’art de décrire la danse. This article focuses on Feuillet’s project, its impact on later systems of dance notation, and the persistent absence of a single, universally accepted standard for recording dance. In order to explore these questions, Feuillet’s treatise is examined through the framework of Charles Sanders Peirce’s diagrammatic logical theory, in particular his existential graphs, which he famously described as “moving pictures of thought.” The analysis concentrates on those stylistic features of notation that serve to represent movement, addressing the normative dimension of signs rather than elaborating the logical theory itself. Issues concerning the deeper nature, genesis, and limits of signs thus lie outside the scope of this study. The juxtaposition of Feuillet’s and Peirce’s approaches yields several important insights into how signs can represent movement and the mechanisms by which they operate. It shows that Feuillet’s original system may indeed be regarded as a genuine form of notation, insofar as it attempts to capture normative structures within dance. At the same time, the comparison brings to light a number of obstacles that prevented Feuillet’s project from becoming a universal standard. First, the syntax of Peirce’s diagrams permits only univocal readings, whereas Feuillet’s signs are open to variation in interpretation. Second, Feuillet’s notation lacks a clearly articulated dominant principle that would govern its use, which leads to ambiguity, unlike Peirce’s explicitly formulated rules of interpretation. Third, Peirce succeeds in cleanly distinguishing between signs that represent thought and the rules governing their manipulation, while Feuillet’s system fuses symbols for steps, poses, and figures with the procedural instructions for performing them. In the appendix to the article, we present the first Russian translation of Christian Wolff’s review of Feuillet’s treatise. This seventeenth-century review was the first to recognize and assess the significance of Feuillet’s work.
Keywords: notation, dance, existential graphs, Peirce, Feuillet, dynamics, diagrammatic logic
References:
Bobrova, A. S. (2021). Logika i vozmozhnosti ikonicheskogo analiza rassuzhdeniy [Logic and possibilities of iconic analysis of reasoning]. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1, 7–24.
Bobrova, A. S., & Pietarinen, A.-V. (2022). Modular vs. diagrammatic reasoning: The pragmatist side of human understanding. Pragmatic and Cognition, 29(1), 111–134.
Bullynck, M. (2013). Erhard Weigel’s contributions to the formation of symbolic logic. History and Philosophy of Logic, 34(1), 25–34.
Feuillet, R. A. (1700). Choregraphie ou l’art de décrire la dance, par caracteres, figures et signes démonstratifs, avec lesquels on apprend facilement de soy‑meme toutes fortes de dances [Choreography or the art of describing dance by characters, figures and demonstrative signs, by which one easily learns all kinds of dances by oneself].
Feuillet, R. A. (2010). Khoreografiya, ili Iskusstvo zapisi tantsa [Choreography, or The art of dance notation] (N. Kaydanovskaya, Trans.). Izd. Dolenko.
Irkhen, I. I., & Lavrova, S. V. (2017). Notatsiya i fiksatsiya khoreograficheskogo teksta v usloviyakh funktsionirovaniya mediasredstv [Notation and fixation of choreographic text in the context of media functioning]. Vestnik Akademii Russkogo baleta im. A. Ya. Vaganovoy, 3, 40–51.
Kruglov, A. N. (2022). Figurnoe, simvolicheskoe i sozertsayushchee poznanie. Ch. I: Ot F. Vieta i G. V. Leybnitsa k I. G. Lambertu [Figurative, symbolic and contemplative cognition. Part I: From F. Vieta and G. W. Leibniz to J. H. Lambert]. Istoriya filosofii, 27(2), 27–41.
Kruglov, A. N. (2023). Figurnoe, simvolicheskoe i sozertsayushchee poznanie. Ch. II: Ot Khr. A. Kruziya k I. Kantu [Figurative, symbolic and contemplative cognition. Part II: From Chr. A. Crusius to I. Kant]. Istoriya filosofii, 28(1), 18–28.
Leibniz, G. W. (1984). Razmyshleniya o poznaniyakh, istine i ideyakh [Reflections on knowledge, truth and ideas]. In G. W. Leibniz, Sochineniya [Works] (G. G. Mayorov & A. L. Subbotin, Eds.; Vol. 3, pp. 101–107). (Filosofskoe nasledie [Philosophical heritage], Vol. 92).
Lemanski, J. (2016). Means or end? On the valuation of logic diagrams [Sredstvo ili tsel’? K istorii otsenok logicheskikh diagramm]. Logiko‑filosofskie studii, 14(4), 98–121.
Lemanski, J. (2019). Logic diagrams, sacred geometry and neural networks. Logica Universalis, 13, 495–513.
Lemanski, J. (2024). Kant’s crucial contribution to Euler diagrams. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 55, 59–78.
Nevile, J. (1999). Dance and the garden: Moving and stating choreography in Renaissance Europe. Renaissance Quarterly, 3, 805–863.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers (Vols. 1–8). Harvard UP.
Peirce, C. S. (1967). Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin: Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. University of Massachusetts Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1971). The Peirce papers: A supplementary catalogue. Transactions of the C. S. Peirce Society, 7, 37–57.
Pietarinen, A. V. (2006). Signs of logic. Springer.
Pietarinen, A. V. (2011). Existential graphs: What a diagrammatic logic of cognition might look like. History and Philosophy of Logic, 32, 265–281.
Rameau, P. (2021). Uchitel’ tantsev [The dancing master]. Planeta muzyki.
Stepanov, V. I. (1892). Alphabet des mouvements du corps humain [Alphabet of human body movements].
Sveshnikova, A. L. (1999). Tvorchestvo Artura Sen‑Leona v Peterburge (1859–1869): stanovlenie muzykal’no‑khoreograficheskoy struktury akademicheskogo baleta [The work of Arthur Saint‑Léon in Petersburg (1859–1869): Formation of the musical‑choreographic structure of academic ballet] (Doctoral dissertation).
Wolff, C. (1711). Choregraphie, ou l’art d’écrire la Dance par caracteres, figures & signes demonstrates, & c. hoc est: Choregraphia, seu ars saltationes per characters, figures & demonstrative exprimendi, quorum ope omnis generis saltationes sine Magistro sibi quis familiars redder valet, Autore Dn. Feuillet. Paris, 1701. In Actorum eruditorum, quae Lipsiae publicantur. Supplementa (Vol. IV, pp. 188–190). J. Grossi.
( 1003.13 kB ) 
( 933.04 kB )
Issue: 2, 2026
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: TRANSLATION AS RESEARCH
Pages: 212 — 235
Downloads: 25