Notes on understanding the dialectics of Kazakh ornament
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2026-1-149-158
The authors discuss the formulation of a research problem for a future project. The focus is on finding the "entry point" for comprehending the principles by which Kazakh ornaments have preserved and continue to preserve a combination of local cultures and global cultural influence. The discussion is structured around clarifying positions, which the authors term groups of visual arguments. These groups are presented in illustrative material: 1. "Depiction of a Mythical Creature"; 2. "Examples of the 'Natural' Selection of Ornamental Elements"; 3. "Variants of the 'Qoshqar Müyiz' Ornament"; 4. "Variants of the 'Qos Müyiz' Ornament"; 5. "The Image of the World Tree and the Tree of Life Ornament". The conclusion is drawn that the potential of visual semiotics creates the "entry point" for understanding the dialectics of ornamentation. Ornament inherits archetypal patterns possessing an enduring appeal. In other words, these patterns transmit ancient and stable conceptions of world order, allowing them to be "read" not through writings, but through ornaments.
Keywords: ornamentation studies, petroglyphs, style, Kazakh ornaments, dialectics
References:
Berezovskaya, V. A. (2018). Periodization of ornaments on bone artifacts from the Stone Age–Early Metal Age of Northern Fennoscandia. Aktual'naya arkheologiya 4. Kompleksnye issledovaniya v arkheologii [Current Archaeology 4. Comprehensive Research in Archaeology]. Proceedings of the International Conference of Young Scientists. Institute of the History of Material Culture of the Russian Academy of Sciences. pp. 146–150. (In Russian).
Gizdatov, G. G. (2023). "Residual meanings" and the aesthetic of intermediality in Pavel Saltzman's Central Asia in the Middle Ages. Quaestio Rossica, 11(4), 1432–1444. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2023.4.847
Gizdatov, G. G. (2024). Media diasporal'nykh grupp Kazakhstana: problemy kul'turnoy identichnosti [Media of diaspora groups in Kazakhstan: Problems of cultural identity]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 92, 248–264.
Gizdatov, G. G. (2025). The manifestation of "transgredience" or the cultural principles of the post-Soviet art diaspora of Kazakhstan. Quaestio Rossica, 13(3), 1112–1126.
Gizdatov, G. G., & Ashimova, Z. A. (2024). Narrativy diaspor v mediinom prostranstve (na materiale etnicheskikh grupp Kazakhstana) [Narratives of diasporas in the media space (based on ethnic groups in Kazakhstan)]. Kritika i semiotika, 2, 296–311.
Guseinov, M. (2022). Khudozhestvennye osnovy kovrodeliya i tamgi v uzoroobrazovanii [Artistic foundations of carpet-making and tamga in pattern formation]. Colloquium Journal, 16, 70–72.
Ibraeva, K. T. (1994). Kazakhskiy ornament [Kazakh ornament]. Oner.
Karutts, R. (1911). Sredi kirgizov i turkmen na Mangyshlake [Among the Kyrgyz and Turkmens in Mangyshlak]. A. F. Devrien.
Khozhzhbaev, E. (2015). Kazakhskie ornamenty kak pikstogramma tengrianskoy kul'tury i kombinatorika ego modulei v sovremennom dizaine [Kazakh ornaments as pictograms of Tengrian culture and the combinatorics of its modules in modern design]. Mektep.
Kuzembaev, S. B., Kaposhko, I. A., Berezyuk, V. G., Lytkina, S. I., & Mishnev, S. V. (2024). Traditional Kazakh ornament in the light of the laws of symmetry (On modeling visual images). ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual'noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1(39), 44–61. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2024-1-44-61
Margulan, A. Kh. (1986). Kazakhskoe narodnoe prikladnoe iskusstvo [Kazakh folk applied art] (Vol. I). Oner.
Margulan, A. Kh. (2003). Sochineniya: T. 3-4. Petroglify Saryarki. Gravyury s izobrazheniem volch'ego totema. Kamennye izvayaniya Ulytau [Works: Vol. 3-4. Petroglyphs of Saryarka. Engravings of the wolf totem. Stone sculptures of Ulytau]. Daik-Press.
Matveeva, O. Yu., & Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2008). Model' vospriyatiya vremeni v sotsiokul'turnykh sistemakh [A model of time perception in sociocultural systems]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 1(75), 63–68.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2005). Mif, mechta, real'nost': postneklassicheskie izmereniya prostranstva kul'tury [Myth, dream, reality: Post-non-classical dimensions of cultural space]. Nauchnyy mir.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2022). Semioticheskaya diagnostika rasshchepleniya traektorii mechty o proshlom i mechty o budushchem [Semiotic diagnostics of the split in the trajectories of the dream about the past and the dream about the future]. Electronic Scientific and Educational Journal "History", 13(4). https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840021199-7
Novgorodova, E. A. (1984). Mir petroglifov Mongolii [The world of Mongolian petroglyphs]. Nauka.
Ospanuly, E. (2021). Etnograficheskiy atlas kazakhskogo ornamenta [Ethnographic atlas of Kazakh ornament]. Shymkent.
Palaguta, I. V. (2020). Ornament kak osobyy vid iskusstva [Ornament as a special kind of art]. Voprosy teorii iskusstva, 1, 45–64.
Rudkovskiy, I. V. (2013). Andronovskaya ornamentika v kontekste sistemoobrazuyushchikh invariantov [Andronovo ornamentation in the context of system-forming invariants]. Almaty.
Shaigozova, Zh. N., & Khazbulatov, A. R. (2021). Sakral'no-simvolicheskoe znachenie zheltofonnoy keramiki: vozmozhnosti rekonstruktsii (na primere arkheologicheskikh artefaktov gorodishcha Kul'tobe) [Sacred and symbolic meaning of yellow-background ceramics: Possibilities of reconstruction (based on archaeological artifacts of the Kul'tobe settlement)]. Central Asian Journal of Art Studies, 3, 74–88.
Sher, Ya. A. (1980). Petroglify Srednei i Tsentral'noy Azii [Petroglyphs of Central and Inner Asia]. Nauka.
Sher, Ya. A., Miklashevich, E. A., Samashev, Z. S., & Sovetova, O. S. (1987). Petroglify Zhaltyrak-Tasha [Petroglyphs of Zhaltyrak-Tash]. In Problemy arkheologicheskikh kul'tur stepey Evrazii [Problems of archaeological cultures of the Eurasian steppes] (pp. 70–78). KemSU.
Zotova, S. V. (1965). Kovrovye ornamenty andronovskoy keramiki [Carpet ornaments of Andronovo ceramics]. In Novoe v sovetskoy arkheologii [New developments in Soviet archeology]. (MIa No. 130, pp. 177–181). Nauka.
( 652.93 kB ) 
( 634.93 kB )
Issue: 1, 2026
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ESSAYS
Pages: 149 — 158
Downloads: 106