Sherlock Holmes, the Hunter, and the symbolic power of scientific knowledge
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2025-4-100-121
An example of a complex interaction in the system “Science, Technology, Society” can serve as a coupling between science and politics, science and power. The study aims to analyze the problematic of the symbolic power of scientific knowledge and to search for characteristic forms of its actualization. The focus is also on the problem of the relationship between real and symbolic power. The history of science and culture, comparative analysis, analysis of everyday life, and case analysis are used as tools. The scientific and theoretical basis of the work is the ideas of P. Bourdieu, who linked acts of manifestation of symbolic power with the role of statements made by different actors of social reality. The similarity of Bourdieu’s position with M. Foucault’s ideas of the totality of power is emphasized. Within the framework of the case of scientific and expert knowledge, the prevalence of the symbolic power of scientists over their real power, which in fact takes place only episodically, is shown. The power-symbolic role of scientific and technological agents is briefly discussed. Like human actors, they are characterized by a dual power role. Aspects related to the interpretation of the image of the “ivory tower” as a location for prognostic statements of scientists are discussed. Here, two polar scenarios are distinguished: skeptical (dismissive) and visionary (strategic). It is demonstrated that in their implementation, subtle relationships of scientists with their “knowledge” and “non-knowledge” are traced. In this regard, visionary scientists (for example, M. Faraday), possessing an implicit socio-technical imaginativeness (Sh. Jasanoff), are most endowed with symbolic power. Four epistemic processes inherent in the scientific and practical activity are distinguished: pursuit, examination, research, investigation (inquiry). The features of their interaction in the broad context of the existence of science are discussed. It is demonstrated that a well-known hero, Sherlock Holmes, acts as a special actor integrating various types of “investigations” in his ontology. Currently, he is an entire cultural phenomenon. At the same time, this phenomenon can be interpreted as a “cultural statement” conditioned by the influence of scientific knowledge and expressing the corresponding attributes of symbolic power. Using the analysis of classic texts by A. Conan Doyle, it is shown that Sherlock Holmes’s activity is realized in a distributed space – outsideness (M. M. Bakhtin) laboratory. Here, the crime scene turns out to be the detective’s laboratory location (field laboratory), and evidence and small details acquire the role of laboratory samples, laboratory records. In the context of pressing problems of our time (uncertainty, risks, artificial intelligence), the characteristic humanity of the appearance of the great detective Sherlock Holmes is emphasized, which is another of his significant symbolic elements.
Keywords: symbolic power, scientific knowledge, ivory tower, research, investigation, outsideness laboratory, detective, clue
References:
Bacon, F. (1978). Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh [Works in two volumes] (vol. 2). Mysl’.
Bazhanov, V. A. (2022). Zatragivaet li krizis vosproizvodimosti matematiku? [Does the reproducibility crisis affect mathematics?]. Philosophy of Science and Technology, 27(1), 70–83.
Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sotsiologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva [Sociology of social space]. Aleteiya.
Buchmann, A. (2020). The mediatization of Sherlock Holmes: Autoethnographic observations on literary and film tourism. In M. Mansson, A. Buchmann, C. Cassinger, & L. Eskilsson (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Media and Tourism (pp. 326–336). Routledge.
Bud, R. (2018). Categorizing science in nineteenth and early twentieth-century Britain. In D. Kaldewey & D. Schauz (Eds.), Basic and Applied Research: The Language of Science Policy in the Twentieth Century (pp. 35–63). Berghahn Books.
Carlizzi, G. (2020). Scientific questions of fact between free evaluation of evidence and proof beyond any reasonable doubt in the criminal trial. Quaestio Facti: International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning, 1, 133–176.
Clark, A. C. (1966). Cherty budushchego [Profiles of the future]. Mir.
Conan Doyle, A. (1966a). Obryad doma Mesgreyvov [The adventure of the Musgrave ritual]. In Sobranie sochinenii: v 8 t. [Collected works: In 8 volumes] (vol. 2, pp. 90–110). Pravda.
Conan Doyle, A. (1966b). Znak chetyrekh [The sign of the four]. In Sobranie sochinenii: v 8 t.*[Collected works: In 8 volumes] (Vol. 1, pp. 151–264). Pravda. (Original work published 1890).
Conan Doyle, A. (1966c). Shest’ Napoleonov [The adventure of the six Napoleons]. In Sobranie sochinenii: v 8 t. [Collected works: In 8 volumes] (Vol. 2, pp. 411–432). Pravda. (Original work published 1904).
Freud, S. (2000). Psikhoanaliz [Psychoanalysis]. Stalker.
Fuller, S. (2021). Postpravda: Znanie kak bor’ba za vlast’ [Post-truth: Knowledge as a power game]. Izdatel’skiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki.
Hesse, H. (1994). Igra v biser [The glass bead game]. In Sobranie sochinenii: v 8 t. [Collected works: In 8 volumes] (vol. 5, pp. 7–466). Progress–Litera.
Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In S. Jasanoff & S. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power (pp. 1–33). University of Chicago Press.
Kasavin, I. T. (2000). Traditsii i interpretatsii: Fragmenty istoricheskoi epistemologii [Traditions and interpretations: Fragments of historical epistemology]. Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute.
Losev, A. F. (2000). Istoriya Antichnoi estetiki. Vysokaya klassika [The history of classical aesthetics. The high classic period]. AST.
Mach, E. (2001). Populyarnye lektsii po fizike [Popular scientific lectures on physics]. Regulyarnaya i Khaoticheskaya Dinamika.
Maslanov, E. V. (2024). K voprosu o politicheskoi sub”ektnosti nauki [On the political subjectivity of science]. Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 8(3), 339–351.
McCaw, N. (2020). Sherlock Holmes and a politics of adaptation. In S. Vanacker & C. Wynne (Eds.), Sherlock Holmes and Conan Doyle (pp. 36–48). Palgrave Macmillan.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2016). Vavilonskaya bashnya – metafora o “semioticheskom attraktore” dinamiki Hi-Tech [The Tower of Babel – a metaphor for the “semiotic attractor” of Hi-Tech dynamics]. Philosophy of Science and Technology, 21(1), 92–103.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2022). About one geographical metaphor. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 69, 27–31. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/69/4
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2023). A “post-normal” state of science: confrontation between impressions and measurements. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 75, 319–323. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863Х/75/28
Naidu, S. (2017). Introduction. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Sherlock Holmes in Context (pp. 1–5). Palgrave Macmillan.
Ross, S. (2021). Nauka Sherloka Kholmsa: metody znamenitogo synshchika v rassledovanii prestuplenii proshlogo i nastoyashchego [The science of Sherlock Holmes: From basker street to the valley of the fear]. Eksmo.
Savchenko, I. A. (2025). Sistemnye dikhotomii sovremennogo etosa nauki (k 115-letiyu Roberta Mertona) [Systemic dichotomies of the modern ethos of science (on the 115th anniversary of Robert Merton)]. Sociology of Science and Technology, 16(1), 74–90.
Sherman, S. (2023). The polyopticon: A diagram for urban artificial intelligences. AI & SOCIETY, 38, 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01340-8
Shibarshina, S. V. (2023). K probleme ispol’zovaniya simvolicheskoi vlasti nauchno-ekspertnogo znaniya [On the problem of using the symbolic power of scientific and expert knowledge]. Digital Scholar: Philosopher’s Laboratory, 6(2), 102–117.
Sibrook, W. (1985). Robert Wood: sovremennyi charodei fizicheskoi laboratorii [Robert Wood: A modern wizard of the laboratory]. Nauka.
Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Tikhonova, S. V. (2023). Praxis and deixis of scientific humanitarian research: in search of a new normality. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 75, 300–306. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/75/25
Varkhotov, T. A. (2023). Non-conventional consent: How we still keep thinking together. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 75, 313–318. (In Russiam). https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/75/27
Ward, V., & Orbell, J. (1988). Sherlock Holmes as a social scientist. Political Science Teacher, 1(1), 15–18.
Wilson, R. W. (1979). Kosmicheskoe mikrovolnovoe fonovoe izluchenie [The cosmic microwave background radiation]. Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk, 129(4), 595–613.
Zharkov, E. A. (2020). Laboratoriya kak vnenakhodimaya sushchnost’ [The laboratory as an ex-situ entity]. Sociology of Science and Technology, 11(4), 175–190.
( 406.8 kB ) 
( 390.68 kB )
Issue: 4, 2025
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 100 — 121
Downloads: 56