Visual markers of cultural identity in the perceptions of educational advisors to principals of contemporary Russian schools
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2025-4-196-213
A new position has now been introduced in Russian schools: advisor to the director for educational work and interaction with public organizations. This study analyzes the results of a free-association survey conducted among three focus groups – schoolchildren, university students, and educational advisors – regarding their interpretation of the concept of “cultural sovereignty”. The findings indicate that the concept is predominantly perceived from the standpoint of “ensuring independence” and “protection from destructive influence”, with less association to the preservation of “cultural identity”. The category of identity was present in the definitions of only 14.5% of the schoolchildren, 23.5% of the students, and 16% of the educators. Subsequently, the research focused on identifying the presence of visual markers of cultural identity. It was determined that such markers are characteristic primarily of educators (found in 100% of their responses), indicating the presence of specific imagery in their understanding of identity. The responses of schoolchildren and students were more abstract and generalized. The visual field of the concept “cultural identity” for all the respondent groups is built around connections with folk culture: traditions, crafts, folklore, and language. Images of cultural spaces and art were also fairly common. Notably absent were visual markers demonstrating a connection to locality (cities, landscapes), science, technology, or modern achievements. This suggests a predominance of a cultural-historical perspective in the perception of sovereignty and identity, but it also points to a degree of stereotyping and a disconnect from modernity. A direct associative method implemented with the educators confirmed these results. The educational practices of the advisors are primarily concentrated on traditional formats (e.g., conversations) or officially established programs (e.g., “Conversations about Important Things”). Over half of the educators experienced difficulties in defining methodological approaches aimed at fostering a value-based attitude towards the concepts “cultural sovereignty” and “identity”, highlighting a clear need for enhancing the preparation of teachers for this work. It has been concluded that there is a shortage of a semiotic approach to the implementation of this training.
Keywords: cultural identity, visual images, educational advisors, questionnaire
References:
Afanas’evskaya, N. V. (2024a). Potentsial vizual’noi kul’tury v sovremennykh issledovaniiakh etnokul’turnoi identichnosti [The potential of visual culture in modern studies of ethno-cultural identity]. Culture and Art, 10, 110–120.
Afanas’evskaya, N. V. (2024b). Vizual’naya kul’tura kak prostranstvo formirovaniya i reprezentatsii etnokul’turnoi identichnosti [Visual culture as a space for the formation and representation of ethno-cultural identity]. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 3(138), 208–213.
Akopova, E. S., Albekov, A. U., & Polubotko, A. A. (2014). Natsional’no-gosudarstvennyi suverenitet v usloviiakh globalizatsii: diskurs identichnosti [National-state sovereignty in the context of globalization: The discourse of identity]. Vestnik of Rostov state University of Economics (RINH), 4(48), 11–16.
Eksakusto, T. V., & Golubeva, Sh. A. (2025). Partsial’nye kharakteristiki mental’nykh reprezentatsii etnicheskoi identichnosti molodykh lyudei [Partial characteristics of mental representations of the ethnic identity of young people]. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, 2, 70–79.
Groys, B. (2023). Politika poetiki [The politics of poetics]. Ad Marginem Press.
Ivanov, E. V., & Titova, E. V. (2023). O kul’turnoi identichnosti i ee znachenii dlya budushchikh pedagogov [On cultural identity and its importance for future teachers]. Man and Education, 4(77), 54–62.
Kovalev, A. A. (2023). Vliyanie sovremennoi transformatsii markerov natsional’noi identichnosti na dominanty natsional’nogo mentaliteta [The impact of the modern transformation of national identity markers on the dominants of the national mentality]. Science. Art. Culture, 4(40), 59–73.
Liga, M. B., Gomboeva, Ya. Z., & Zakharov, M. A. (2025). Kul’turnaya identichnost’ i kul’turnaya gbridnost’: aktual’nye teoretiko-metodologicheskie podkhody k issledovaniyu [Cultural identity and cultural hybridity: Current theoretical and methodological approaches to research]. Humanitarian Vector, 20(1), 33–43.
Lisenkova, A. A. (2018). Osobennosti formirovaniya rossiiskoi kul’turnoi identichnosti [Peculiarities of the formation of Russian cultural identity]. Values and Meanings, 2, 55–68.
Makarenko, A. N., Melik-Gaikazyan, I. V., & Smyshlyaeva, L. G. (2023). Education digitalization astigmatism: Problem setting for semiotic diagnostics of consequences. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 3, 90–110. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2023-3-90-110
Matveeva, E. V. (2018). [Markers of youth cultural identity]. Baykal’skiye vstrechi–X: Kul’turnaya pamyat’ i kul’turnaya identichnost’ v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Baikal Meetings–X: Cultural Memory and Cultural Identity in the Context of Globalization]. Proceedings of the International Conference. Ulan-Ude, Russia. 20–22 September 2018. VSGIK. pp. 521–528. (In Russian).
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2008). Modelirovanie obrazovatel’nykh sistem: issledovatel’skaya programma [Modeling educational systems: A research program]. Higher Education in Russia, 9, 89–94.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2014). Semiotika obrazovaniya ili “klyuchi” i “otmyshki” k modelirovaniyu obrazovatel’nykh sistem [Semiotics of education or “keys” and “lockpicks” for modeling educational systems]. Ideas and Ideals, 1(4), 14–27.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2022). Semioticheskaya diagnostika rasshchepleniya traektorii mechty o proshlom i mechty o budushchem [Semiotic diagnostics of the split in the trajectories of the dream about the past and the dream about the future]. Electronic Scientific and Educational Journal “History”, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.18254/S207987840021199-7
Nagoy, A. A. (2022). Urovni formirovaniya kul’turnoi identichnosti [Levels of cultural identity formation]. Vestnik Adygeiskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya “Regionovedenie: Filosofiya, Istoriya, Sotsiologiya, Yurisprudentsiya, Politologiya, Kul’turologiya”, 2(299), 109–119.
Nalbadyan, E. N. (2023). Vizual’nye reprezentatsii kak sposob konstruirovaniya smyslov v kul’ture [Visual representations as a way of constructing meanings in culture]. Kul’turnaya Zhizn’ Yuga Rossii, 4(91), 134–141.
Ostrikova, G. N., & Nadolinskii, P. E. (2023). Eksperimental’noe issledovanie kul’turnoi identichnosti shkol’nikov [Experimental study of the cultural identity of schoolchildren]. Gumanitarnye i Sotsial’nye Nauki, 100(5), 152–157.
Pakina, L. E. (2024). Fenomen kul’turnoi identichnosti v kontekste globalizatsii [The phenomenon of cultural identity in the context of globalization]. Mezhdunarodnyi Nauchno-Issledovatel’skii Zhurnal, 4(142), 43–47.
President of the Russian Federation. (2023). Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of January 25, 2023, No. 35 “On Amendments to the Fundamentals of the State Cultural Policy, approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 24, 2014, No. 808”. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/48855
Rezanova, Z. I. (2007). (2010). Metaforicheskii fragment russkoi yazykovoi kartiny mira: idei, metody, resheniia [The metaphorical fragment of the Russian linguistic world view: Ideas, methods, solutions]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 1(9), 26–43.
Rosenberg, N. V., & Karpova, M. K. (2024). Simvoly gosudarstvennoi identichnosti v predstavleniyakh rossiiskoi studencheskoi molodezhi [Symbols of state identity in the perceptions of Russian students]. Science. Society. State, 2(46), 120–130.
Tokarev, G. V. (2024). O lingvokul’turologicheskoi interpretatsii problemy identichnosti [On the linguo-cultural interpretation of the identity problem]. Tul’skii Nauchnyi Vestnik. Seriya Istoriya. Yazykoznanie, 2(18), 69–75.
Vodop’yan, V. G., & Khamaganova, K. V. (2018). Vizual’nye kody kul’turnoi identichnosti v sovremennom mediaprostranstve [Visual codes of cultural identity in the modern media space]. Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History, 32, 229–235.
Voevodina, L. N., & Kubaeva, A. M. (2021). Konstruirovanie identichnosti v aktual’noi vizual’noi kul’ture [Identity construction in contemporary visual culture]. Culture and Education, 1(40), 29–35.
( 362.88 kB ) 
( 349.34 kB )
Issue: 4, 2025
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 196 — 213
Downloads: 48