The semiotics of the letter in contemporary art: Typographic biohacking by Oded Ezer
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2025-1-70-92
The work of a contemporary artist with fonts cannot be interpreted only on the basis of the traditions the artist refers. It is necessary to study actors who actualize traditions. The font, being a design element, in art can acquire the meaning of a bodily code that determines bodily reactions to social memory. The article examines the projects of one of the world’s leading media artists working with fonts. It is demonstrated that the semiotics of the textual sign can be supplemented by the premises and conclusions of Bruno Latour’s actor–network theory. The actor–network theory insists on the instability of systems and on the compensatory function of the body: the body is not some basis of experience or observation, but one of the factors of the presence of action, which makes it necessary to keep the system in a mobile equilibrium. The body participates in, rather than cognizes, a system of relations between cognizing and cognizable things networked together. Oded Ezer’s case study examines the implantation of the script in cultural memory, made possible by the development of media in art. Oded Ezer, although drawing on the traditions of the Jewish mysticism of the letter and the achievements of contemporary media art, understands the letter as a multiple authorized element embedded in networks of perception, both everyday and specialized. The plasticity of the works brings everyday optics closer to the optics of specialized practices, primarily medical, which engage different things as equals inside networked interactions to ensure a sustainable equilibrium of production. In this way, the actor–network theory proves productive for interpreting art that is neither reducible to science art nor to a reflection on the past. Ezer’s work needs to be reconstructed rather than interpreted, drawing on the advances of the actor–network theory and the critical study of self-presentation. The body proves to be the most malleable actor in the network, allowing us to identify gaze and memory, touch and action. Ezer’s work is not merely performative; it brings together different forms of participation, and thus its effect can be labeled as a typographic metaperformativity that incorporates natural objects as well. Ezer’s self-disclosure of the method is carried out in his work on the legacy of Franz Kafka, abandoning interpretation in favor of endowing Kafka’s metamorphoses with a new sense of biohacking in which human and non-human agents participate. Kafka’s hero turns out to be not just the author of fate, but the author of books and the creator of the mode of book production; i.e., the method associated with the actor–network theory is reproduced in the semiotic expressiveness of this work.
Keywords: bioart, font design, actor–network theory, Oded Ezer, Franz Kafka, science art, media, communication, performativity, corporeality
References:
Beetz, J. (2013). Latour with Greimas: Actor-network theory and semiotics. https://www.academia.edu/11233971/Latour_with_Greimas_-_Actor-Network_Theory_and_Semiotics
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
Greimas, A. (2004). Structural semantics. Search for a method. Akademicheskiy proekt. (In Russian).
Jeff, B. et al. (2017). Using the social semiotics approach in multimodal analysis: a study of learning in schools, museums and hospitals. METHOD: Moscow Yearbook of Proceedings from Social Sciences, 7, 227–247. (in Russian).
Latour, B. (2014). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Higher School of Economics. (in Russian).
Latour, B. (2017). On actor-network theory. Some clarifications, supplemented by more complications. Logos, 27(1), 173–200. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-173-197
Law, J. (2015). After method: disorder and social science. Gaidar Institute Publishing House. (In Russian).
Lotman, Yu. (1996). Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek — tekst — semiosfera — istoriya [Inside Thinking Worlds. Man – text – semiosphere – history]. Yazyki russkoy kul’tury
Markov, A. V. (2014). 1980: god rozhdeniya povsednevnosti [1980: the year of the birth of everyday life]. Evropa.
Propp, V. (2021). Morfologiya skazki. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki [Morphology of the fairy tale. Historical roots of the magic fairy tale]. Piter.
Shmaina-Velikanova, A. I. (2023). NB. In Mif, ritual, literatura [Myth, ritual, literature] (pp. 29–39). National Research University Higher School of Economics.
Shtayn, O. A. (2012). The End of the Individual as We Knew It. Vestnik Russkoy khristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii, 13(3), 86–90. (In Russian).
Shtayn, O. A. (2013). From Subject to Subjectivity: Biography and Topography. In: Istina i dialog [Truth and Dialogue]. Proceedings of the XIII Holy Trinity Annual International Academic Readings in St. Petersburg (pp. 144–150). St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy. (In Russian).
Shtayn, O. A. (2025). The Metaphysics of Fog by Vernor Herzog. Art and Science of Television, 1. (In Russian).
Sosnovskaya, A. M (2023). The problem of applying the method of actor-network theory in the theory of media and media communication. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 5(4), 282–304. (In Russian). https://doi.org.10.46539/gmd.v5i4.435
Sosnovskaya, A. M. (2024). Culture of an urban park: A dispositive and actor-network analysis of the Internationalist Park in St. Petersburg. Artikult, 1(53), 91–111. (In Russian). https://doi.org.10.28995/2227-6165-2024-1-91-111
Toporov, V. N. (2005). Bukvennost’ i smysl [Lettering and Meaning]. In Chelovek – iskusstvo – obshchestvo (zakon tselogo): Sb. k yubileyu prof. Yu. B. Boreva [Human – Art – Society (Law of the Whole): To the anniversary of Prof. Yu. B. Borev] (pp. 17–33). Nauka.
Uvarov, V. D., Reshetova, M. V., & Murashkin, I. S. (2017). Information explosion and new technologies in the refraction of harmonizing means of design (tapisserie and accidental font). Dizayn i tekhnologii, 62(104), 114–121. (In Russian).
Xu Yu, & Polyakova, O. V. (2020). Font as a means of visualization of verbal information. Universitetskiy nauchnyy zhurnal, 57, 261–266. https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22225064.2020.57.261.266
( 697.35 kB ) 
( 671.6 kB )
Issue: 1, 2025
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 70 — 92
Downloads: 825