Semiotic treatment of a visual philosophy lecture: The mechanical duck of Descartes
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2024-3-165-190
Teaching the history of philosophy requires actualization; visual studies provide a distinctive asset for such actualization. The history of philosophy should be conceived as an exposition of a series of issues, each of which can be modeled visually, and more complex models can be reduced to simpler and more precise ones. Each philosophical thesis can then be presented as a use of the view of philosophy itself: the metaphor of sight in Western philosophy turns out to be not only the common denominator of methods, but the semiotically optimal justification for any method new to the listeners or to a professional philosophical readership. The use of images produced by artificial intelligence then proves to be productive for such instantiation. The lecture shows how the history of philosophy and science was not only the exploration of new objects with the help of ontological tools, but also the ontologization of whole areas of consciousness, including imaginary ones. In this way, the discovery of the world was also the discovery of the mirror of one’s own consciousness. Descartes put this experiment in its purest form by establishing an ontology of science. Unlike the usual accounts of new European rationalism, which emphasize the priority of experimental science over theoretical generalization, the lecture provides a more complex view. The Renaissance virtue destroyed the correlation of the ontological tools of human self-justification with the worlds of nature and art, whereas Descartes only completed this destruction. But his voluntarism and teleology were rooted in Jesuit science, and the development first of the Baroque imagination and then of the Enlightenment imagination destroyed the initial self-evidence of Descartes as well. As in the Renaissance, its own ontological domain of signs emerged, only their number became unlimited, unlike the small set of them in the Renaissance rhetoric, and visual semiotics eventually devolved into a romanizing imagination. With the help of illustrations created by artificial intelligence, it has been possible to present in the lecture these complex vicissitudes of imagination and the formation of new ontological domains that can undermine or order other domains of ontology, including the ontology of pure consciousness. The lecture allows us to better understand both the main problem of ontology as a discipline of philosophy and the informational productivity of visual signs produced by artificial intelligence.
Keywords: rationalism, visual research, artificial intelligence, ontology program, ontology of sign, epistemology, visual aid, philosophy of puppet
References:
Casanova, P. (2003). The World Republic of Letters. Izdatel’stvo imeni Sabashnikovykh. (In Russian).
Chartier, R. (2006). Written Culture and Society. Moscow: New Publishing House. (In Russian).
Descartes, R. (1953). Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology. USSR Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).
Descartes, R. (1989). Opera: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Mysl’. (In Russian).
Descartes, R. (1994). Opera: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Mysl’. (In Russian).
Diderot, D. (1991). Opera: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Mysl’. (In Russian).
Faibyshenko V. Y. (2002). Poeticheskaya ratsional’nost’ i osnovaniya gumanitarnogo znaniya [Poetic rationality and the foundations of humanitarian knowledge]. Philosophy Cand. Diss. Moscow State University.
Kittler, Fr. (2009). Optical Media. Logos; Gnosis. (In Russian).
La Mettrie, J. (1983). Essays. Mysl’. (In Russian).
Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Brain – text – culture – artificial intelligence. In Semiosfera Semiosphere] (pp. 580–589). Art-SPb. (In Russian).
Marion, J.-L. (2007). On Descartes’ White Theology. Vestnik RHGA, 1, 129–141. (in Russian).
Maturana, H. (1996). Language and intelligence. Progress. (In Russian).
Moretti, F. (2014). The bourgeois. Gaidar Institute. (in Russian).
Ocheretyanyi, K. (2013). Khaofoniya: analitika mediatela [Chaophony: analytics of medial body]. Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo.
Petrarca, F. (1981). Invective contra medicum. In V. P. Shestakov (Ed.), Estetika Renessansa v 2 t. [Renaissance Aesthetics in 2 vols] (vol. 1, pp. 17–26). Iskusstvo. (In Russian).
Pogonyaylo, A. G. (1998). Filosofiya zavodnoy igrushki, ili apologiya mekhanitsizma [Philosophy of a Clockwork Toy, or the Apology of Mechanicism]. St Petersburg University. (In Russian).
Shvarts, E. (1995). Pesnya ptitsy na dne morskom [Song of a bird on the seabed]. Pushkinskiy fond.
( 1.6 MB ) 
( 1.54 MB )
Issue: 3, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: OPEN LECTURE
Pages: 165 — 190
Downloads: 160