“Vestibule” as a pattern of the visual environment: Urban practices’ scenarios
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2024-3-9-36
The article considers one of the basic load-bearing elements of the urban texture – the space in front of the entrance to the most significant urban buildings. The analysis of the types and functions of such patterns, their connections with other basic elements of the urban topic, their influence on the configuration of urban practices is the most important resource for the growth of knowledge in the field of visual semiotics of the city. The current stage of development of urban studies requires an increasingly focused shift of attention from the urban planning and aesthetic aspects of a particular pattern (already sufficiently studied) to its pragmatics. This refocusing of epistemic optics allows us to see and analyze the elements of the urban environment not as physical constants, but as dynamic local scenarios, which is most consistent with the understanding of the city as a complex cultural and communicative phenomenon. To identify and develop these issues, the article simultaneously applies two methodological approaches to the study of the urban environment: visual-semiotic and anthropological. The work shows that any building (ensemble) that is significant in sociocultural terms, be it a theater, university, administration, station or cathedral, occupies a certain place on the urban stage and plays its specific role in the aesthetic and pragmatic configuration of the urban environment, acting not only as an object aesthetic contemplation, but also as a mediated actor (motivator) of emotional and behavioral scenarios offered to citizens and guests of the city. In the construction of these patterns, the rules of relationship between architectural facades and the surrounding open space play an important role. Properly located and structured “vestibules” present a city building in its significance, orient people’s attention and action, and contribute to the integration of a person into the city’s psychological environment. Ignoring the pragmatic-anthropological aspects of the formation of entrance spaces leads to the destruction of the visual frame of the city and becomes the basis for the existential discomfort of its inhabitants and visitors.
Keywords: urban visual environment, pattern, entrance area, theater, university, pragmatics, scenario, urban space
References:
Alexander, Ch., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. A. (2014). Pattern Language. Towns. Buildings. Construction (I. Syrova, Trans.). Art. Lebedev Studio. (In Russian).
Arkin, D. E. (2013). Obrazy arkhitektury [Images of Architecture]. B.S.G.-PRESS.
Arnheim, R. (1984). The Dynamics of Architectural Form (V. L. Glazychev, Trans.). Stroyizdat. (In Russian).
Avanesov, S. S. (2014). What can be called Visual Semiotics? ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1, 10–22. (In Russian).
Avanesov, S. S. (2018). Urban Space as Anthropological Phenomenon. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2(16), 10–31. (In Russian).
Avanesov, S. S. (2023). Square as a Visual Pattern of the Urban Environment. Urbis et Orbis. Mikroistoriya i semiotika goroda – Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 3(1), 5–31. (In Russian).
Azizyan, I. A., & Kirillova, L. I. (Eds.). (1990). Arkhitekturnyy ansambl’ kak forma realizatsii sinteza [Architectural Ensemble as a Form of Synthesis Implementation]. VNIITAG.
Baranov, N. N. (1980). Siluet goroda [Silhouette of the City]. Stroyizdat.
Barkhin, M. G. (1979). Arkhitektura i gorod. Problemy razvitiya sovetskogo zodchestva [Architecture and the City. Problems of Development of Soviet Architecture]. Nauka.
Belyaeva, E. L. (1977). Arkhitekturno-prostranstvennaya sreda goroda kak ob”ekt zritel’nogo vospriyatiya [Architectural Spatial Environment of the City as an Object of Visual Perception]. Stroyizdat.
Bondarenko, I. A. (2017). Teoriya v istorii arkhitektury i gradostroitel’stva [Theory in the History of Architecture and Urban Planning]. Kolo.
Bondarenko, I. A. (2022). On the Need to Revise the Theory of the Unity of Urban Environment. In Arkhitekturnaya modernizatsiya sredy zhiznedeyatel’nosti. Istoriya i teoriya [Architectural Modernization of the Living Environment. History and Theory] (Book 1, pp. 387–399). Archi.ru – Kolo. (In Russian).
Bunin, A., & Kruglova, T. (1935). Urban Complex in the Architecture of the Renaissance. In Voprosy arkhitektury [Questions of Architecture] (pp. 58–91). OGIZ. (In Russian).
Ellard, C. (2016). Places of the Heart. The Psychogeography of Everyday Life. Alpina Publisher. (In Russian).
Glazychev, V. L. (2021). Urbanistika [Urbanism]. Evropa; KDU.
Goncharov, M. N. (2009). Architectural and Landscape Development Techniques for the Theatre Squares on example of the Paris Commune Square in Yekaterinburg City. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta – Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University, 2(38), 152–155. (In Russian).
Ikonnikov, A. V. (1985). Khudozhestvennyy yazyk arkhitektury [The Artistic Language of Architecture]. Iskusstvo.
Krasheninnikov, A. V. (2017). Scenario Design of the Urban Environment. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 4(41), 242–256. (In Russian).
Likhachev, D. S. (2006). Razdum’ya o Rossii [Thoughts about Russia] (pp. 552–570). Logos.
Lindner, R. (2019). Textur, imaginaire, Habitus – Schlüsselbegriffe der kulturanalytischen Stadtforschung (K. Levinson, Trans.). In Die Eigenlogik der Städte. Neue Wege für die Stadtforschung (pp. 101–116). NLO. (In Russian).
Lotman, Yu. M. (1996). Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov: Chelovek – tekst – semiosfera – istoriya [Inside Thinking Worlds: Man – Text – Semiosphere – History]. Yazyki russkoi kultury. (In Russian).
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge Technology Press.
Markuzon, V. F. (1986). Antique Elements in the Architecture of the Italian Renaissance. In L. M. Bragina (Ed.), Culture of the Renaissance. (pp. 54–68). Nauka. (In Russian).
Mikoleit, A., & Pürckhauer, M. (2020). Urban Code. 100 Lessons for Understanding the City. (A. Tarasenko, Trans.). Strelka Press. (In Russian).
Pålsson, K. (2019). How to Design Humane Cities. DOM Publishers. (In Russian).
Proust, M. (2023). Du côté de chez Swann. (A. Frankovsky, Trans.). AST. (In Russian).
Sazonova, N. I. (2019). Christian Church in Urban Space: The Two Concepts of the City. Vizual’naya teologiya – Journal of Visual Theology, 1, 55–69. (In Russian).
Sherstiuk, A. A. (2023). Visual-Semiotic Patterns in the Study of Urban Architectural Identity: Artistic and Aesthetic Perception of Old Building Facades in Kaliningrad. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City, 3(1), 134–148.
Simsky, A. (2020). The Discovery of Hierotopy. Journal of Visual Theology, 1, 9–28.
Sitte, C. (1993). Der Städte-Bau nach seinen Künstlerischen Grundsätzen. (Ya. A. Krastin’sh, Trans.). Stroyizdat. (In Russian).
Smirnov, S. A. (2021). Gorod i chelovek. Ocherki gorodskoy antropologii [City and Man. Essays in Urban Anthropology]. URSS.
Sudjic, D. (2020). The Language of Cities. (M. Korobochkin, Trans.). Strelka Press. (In Russian).
( 6.53 MB ) 
( 6.48 MB )
Issue: 3, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 9 — 36
Downloads: 234