THE SEMIOTIC BASIS OF KAZAKH CULTURE: ORNAMENT AS AN ETHNO-SIGN CODE
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2024-1-120-142
The relevance of the study of ornament in a semiotic way is confirmed by the active research in the world semiotic science enriching its methodological reserve more and more. The results of studies on problems of ornament as a semiotic structure and ethnographic code since the mid-twentieth century are illustrated by dozens of works on the material of different cultures: Slavic, Balkan, and many others. However, it should be acknowledged that at the moment all the diversity, beauty, intelligence, plasticity, aesthetics and semantics of Kazakh (and wider Turkic) ornament are little known outside Kazakhstan. Many aspects of Kazakh ornament remain insufficiently studied from the standpoint of semiotic research, which will expand the horizons of understanding not only ornamental art itself as a “chronicle of culture”, but also its symbolic nature and code system. Ornament in such a reading appears as a special kind of language, a sign system that exists in structural unity with other structures of the cultural whole. On the one hand, ornamental design functions in the field of various types of traditional art and crafts: textile art and costume, wood and stone processing, jewelry, pottery, architecture, rock art, tamgas, and others; thus, considering ornament as a special kind of a sign system, we should also remember the polysemantic nature of ethno-sign codes. On the other hand, the internal structure of ornament correlates with other languages of culture: music, poetry (oral culture), writing, dance, etc., as well as with the phenomenon of Tengrian calendar, which is seemingly incommensurable in its functionality. The article presents the results of a study of the structural model of ornament in its correlation with the languages of other phenomena of Kazakh culture.
Keywords: ornament, Kazakh culture, semiotic basis, ethno-sign code
References:
Akhmetov, Z. A. (1964). Kazakhskoe stikhoslozhenie (problemy razvitiya stikha v dorevolyutsionnoy i sovremennoy poezii) [Kazakh versification (problems of the development of verse in pre-revolutionary and modern poetry)]. Nauka. (In Russian).
Amanov, B., & Mukhambetova, A. (2003). Kazakhskaya traditsionnaya muzyka i XX vek [Kazakh traditional music and the 20th century]. Dayk-Press. (In Russian).
Baltabaev, M. Kh. (1997). Sovremennaya khudozhestvennaya kul’tura Kazakhstana: gnoseologiya, mental’nost’, preemstvennost’, perspektivy [Contemporary artistic culture of Kazakhstan: epistemology, mentality, continuity, prospects]. RNTsPK. (In Russian).
Bayburin, A. K. (1981). Semioticheskiy status veshchey i mifologiya [Semiotic status of things and mythology]. Material’naya kul’tura i mifologiya. Sbornik Muzeya antropologii i etnografii, 37, 215–226. (In Russian).
Belokurova, S. M. (2016). Tamga signs in the culture of nomads as a subject of art historical analysis (posing the question). Iskusstvo Evrazii, 2(3), 10–16. (In Russian).
Brend, B. (2008). Art of Islamic art. Grand Fair. (In Russian).
Chistyakova, N. A., & Vulikh, N. V. (1971). Istoriya antichnoy literatury [History of ancient literature]. Vysshaya shkola. (In Russian).
Donskikh, O. A. (2023). Language as an indicator of the visualization of scientific thinking. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2(36), 74–80. doi: 10.23951/2312-7899-2023-2-74-80 (In Russian).
Dosanov, T. S. (2009). Tayna runiki: graficheskiy dizayn v ezotericheskoy kontseptsii boga Tengri, sokrytoy v znakakh runicheskogo pis’ma, v rodovykh tamgakh i v simvolakh geometricheskogo geneza [The mystery of the runes: graphic design in the esoteric concept of the god Tengri, hidden in the signs of runic writing, in ancestral tamgas and in symbols of geometric genesis]. Olke. (In Russian).
Dzhanibekov, U. (1991). Ekho …Po sledam legendy o zolotoy dombre [Echo ...In the footsteps of the legend of the golden dombra]. Өner. (In Russian).
Dzhumabekova, G. S., & Bazarbaeva, G. A. (2018). Illustration for the epic about Alpamys and some parallels to the plot in the art of ancient nomads: towards the study of the semantics of vortex compositions. Қazaқstan arkheologiyasy, 1-2, 106–117. (In Russian).
Fischinger, O. (1932). Sound Ornaments. Originally published in the Deutsche allgemeine Zeitung, 8 July 1932. URL: https://www.asmir.info/lib/fischinger.htm
Galieva, M. A. (2016). Transformatsiya fol’klornoy traditsii v russkoy poezii nachala XX veka: S.A. Esenin i V.V. Mayakovskiy [Transformation of folklore tradition in Russian poetry of the early 20th century: S.A. Yesenin and V.V. Mayakovsky]. Abstract of Philology Cand. Diss. Moscow. (In Russian).
Gilevich, E. V. (2012). Traditsionnyy ornament kak semioticheskaya struktura [Traditional ornament as a semiotic structure]. Cultural Science Cand. Diss. Moscow.
Gravitis, V. (1990). Well-forgotten old things. About some folk ornamental signs. Rodnik, 3(39), 31–36. (In Russian).
Guseynov, M. (2022). Artistic foundations of carpet weaving and tamga in pattern formation. Colloquium Journal, 16, 70–72. (In Russian).
Ibraeva, K. T. (1994). Kazakhskiy ornament [Kazakh ornament]. Oner. (In Russian).
Karapet’yants, A. M. (1972). Izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo i pis’mo v arkhaicheskikh kul’turakh (Kitay do serediny I tysyacheletiya do n. e.) [Fine arts and writing in archaic cultures (China until the middle of the 1st millennium BC)]. In Rannie formy iskusstva [Early forms of art] (pp. 458–469). Iskusstvo. (In Russian).
Kazhgali uly, A. (2003). Organon ornamenta [Organon of ornament]. Oner. (In Russian).
Kostomarov, V. G., & Burvikova, N. D. (2000). Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk i kul’turnaya pamyat’ [Modern Russian language and cultural memory]. In Etnokul’turnaya spetsifika rechevoy deyatel’nosti [Ethnocultural specificity of speech activity] (pp. 20–32). INION RAS. (In Russian).
Kotlyar, E. R. (2019). Ethno-cultural parallels in the semiotics of the architectural decor of modern style period in Simferopol. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 3(21), 98–112. doi: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-3-98-112 (In Russian).
Kul’bekova, A. K. (2008). Content aspects of Kazakh folk dance. Vestnik MGUKI, 2, 253–257. (In Russian).
Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Izbrannye stat’i [Selected articles] (vol. 1, pp. 191–200). Tallin: Tartu. (In Russian).
Ol’khovskiy, V. S. (2001). Tamga (to the function of the sign). Istoriko-arkheologicheskiy al’manakh, 7, 75–86. (In Russian).
Palaguta, I. V. (2020). Ornament as a special form of art. Voprosy teorii iskusstva, 1, 45–64. (In Russian).
Privalova, V. M. (2010). Semantics of ornament in the semiotics of culture (anthropological projection of ritual in geometric ornament). Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 5, 277–283. (In Russian).
Privalova, V. M. (2011). The conditionality of ornament as a sign-symbolic ritual in culture. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, 2, 1001–1005. (In Russian).
Romm, V. V. (2003). Paleochoreography. Chelovek, 1, 19–35. (In Russian).
Ryzhakova, S. I. (2002). Yazyk ornamenta v latyshskoy kul’ture [The language of ornament in Latvian culture]. Indrik.
Sadokov, R. L. (1996). Musical archeology of ancient and medieval Central Asia: percussion instruments. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 6, 34–44. (In Russian).
Seydembek, A. (2011). Mir kazakhov. Etnokul’turologicheskoe pereosmyslenie [World of Kazakhs. Ethnocultural rethinking]. Foliant.
Shaygozova, Zh. N., & Khazbulatov, A. R. (2021). The sacred symbolic meaning of ceramics glazed with a yellow background: possibilities of reconstruction (archaeological artifacts from the Kultobe settlement). Central Asian Journal of Art Studies, 3, 74–88.
Shevtsova, A. A. (2007). Kazakhskiy narodnyy ornament: istoki i traditsii [Kazakh folk ornament: origins and traditions]. Nauka. (In Russian).
Shukurov, Sh. M. (1999). Iskusstvo i tayna [Art and mystery]. Aleteya. (In Russian).
Shukurov, Sh. M. (2016). Khorosan. Territoriya iskusstva [Khorosan. Territory of art]. Progress-traditsiya.
Sokolov, B. G. (2001). Rhythm and meaning. Sotsial’naya analitika ritma [Social analytics of rhythm]. Conference Proceedings. Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo. pp. 45–57. (In Russian).
Sultanova, M. E. (2010). Fine arts and music: comparativism of art language. Vestnik KazNPU im. Abaya. Seriya “Khudozhestvennoe obrazovanie: iskusstvo, teoriya i metodika”, 3(24), 2–7. (In Russian).
Summers, D. (2003). Real Spaces. World Art History and the Rise of Western Modernism. Phaidon.
Tanieva, Zh. K. (2010). Znaki i simvoly v traditsionnom i sovremennom izobrazitel’nom iskusstve Kazakhstana [Signs and symbols in traditional and modern fine arts of Kazakhstan]. Art History Cand. Diss. Almaty.
Tokhtabaeva, Sh. Zh. (2005). Serebryanyy put’ kazakhskikh masterov [The silver path of Kazakh masters]. Dayk-Press.
Toporov, V. N. (1972). K proiskhozhdeniyu nekotorykh poeticheskikh simvolov: Paleoliticheskaya epokha [On the origin of some poetic symbols: Paleolithic era]. In Rannie formy iskusstva [Early forms of art] (pp. 79–93). Iskusstvo.
Turekulov, T. (2000). New reconstruction of the “Golden Man”: a club for connoisseurs of antiquity. Kumbez, 9-10, 46–50. (In Russian).
Turekulova, N. (1998). The “Golden Man” and his ideas about the world: from time immemorial. Kumbez, 3, 32–35. (In Russian).
Vasil’eva, E. N. (2013). The path of a researcher of visual symbolism of folk culture: per aspera ad astra. Chelovek i religiya [Man and religion]. Proceedings of the International Conference. 14–16 March 2013. Izdatel’stvo “Chetyre chetverti”, pp. 234–239. (In Russian).
Vsevolodskaya-Golushkevich, O. V. (1996). Baksy oyyny. Rauan. (In Kazakh).
Yablan, S. (2006). Simmetriya, ornamenty i modulyarnost’ [Symmetry, ornaments and modularity]. Institut komp’yuternykh issledovaniy.
Zhanabaev, K., & Akberdikyzy, U. (2015). Semantika i struktura tyurkskogo epicheskogo teksta: anafora [Semantics and structure of the Turkic epic text: anaphora]. Uchenye zapiski, 2(43), 127–135.
( 867.31 kB ) 
( 818.48 kB )
Issue: 1, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 120 — 142
Downloads: 387