DIGITAL BIOETHICS AS DIGITAL HEALTH ETHICS
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2023-1-9-29
Personalized medicine development includes an active use of digital products and tools for diagnosing, treating and monitoring health. This phenomenon generates such digital-related concepts as “digital health,” “Digital Medicine,” “Digital Therapeutics,” or “Digital Wellness.” Digital health includes tele- and algorithmic medicine, e-health, and mobile health. Bioethics represents a research area and social institution. Bioethics should increase the ethical support for bioethical choice subjects in the context of the social practices’ transformation in personal and public health. The article highlights the features of the subject and methodology interpretation; indicates the prospects for the development of digital bioethics. This article describes digital bioethics as digital health ethics. This interpretation differs from the understanding of digital bioethics as a field of using digital methods of empirical research. The research subject is social relations regarding confidentiality, truthfulness, trust, justice, and accountability. The entire social system is involved in the bioethical analysis, since the ethical issues of digital health are considered in a wide context of social dynamics, economic interactions, and political governance. Thus, digital bioethics is close to biopolitics. Digital bioethics uses several approaches. It refers to certain ethical theories to evaluate the results of the digital health technologies’ use. It considers different digital health-related situations through bioethical principles. It also describes the ethical harm in the digital technologies’ creation and integration in healthcare. Ethical issues are related to the social mechanisms in which they are created and used. The moral dilemmas’ resolution is seen as power relations’ manifestation. Digital bioethics analyzes the policy of various healthcare actors, the dependence of digital health on communication infrastructure and economic influence. Digital bioethics proposes to address treatment depersonalization and anonymization which represent the consequences of health and disease datafication. Digital bioethics complements empirical description of digital health practices and public health policies. On the one hand, digital bioethics is a field of digital methods’ application for studying bioethical discourse in the digital space. Thus, digital bioethics digitizes analog methods and additionally develops digital analysis methods. On the other hand, digital bioethics is defined as digital health ethics, and does not pay attention to the development of its own research methods. These two interpretations are interconnected. According to digital bioethics, ethically acceptable futures are the basis for management decisions in healthcare. This fact enhances a comprehensive transdisciplinary description of digital ethical foundations and ethical regulation mechanisms. Bioethics, algoretics, artificial intelligence ethics, engineering ethics, business ethics, political ethics, and other manifestations of applied ethics can be combined into a unique research complex and form a common mechanism for social and humanitarian innovations’ expertise. Prospects for the digital bioethics’ development should be comprehended through the empirical and normative traditions, the correlation of analog and digital discourses of bioethics, as well as the peculiarities of the bioethical institutions’ functioning in the digital space.
Keywords: ethics, bioethics, digital bioethics, social and humanitarian expert appraisal, digital healthcare, digital health
References:
Allington, D., Duffy, B., Wessely, S., Dhavan, N., & Rubin, J. (2021). Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological medicine, 51(10), 1763–1769.
Bayram, M., Springer, S., Garvey, C. K., & Özdemir, V. (2020). COVID-19 Digital Health Innovation Policy: A Portal to Alternative Futures in the Making. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 24(8), 460–469.
Belyaeva, E. V. (2018). Tsifrovoe obshchestvo i vozmozhnosti ego eticheskogo regulirovaniya [Digital society and the possibilities of its ethical regulation]. Vedomosti prikladnoy etiki – Statements of the Applied Ethics, 52, 74–82.
Brall, C., Schröder-Bäck, P., & Maeckelberghe, E. (2019). Ethical aspects of digital health from a justice point of view. European Journal of Public Health, 29, Supplement 3, 18–22.
Char, D. S., Abràmoff, M. D., & Feudtner, C. (2020). Identifying ethical considerations for machine learning healthcare applications. The American Journal of Bioethics, 20(11), 7–17.
Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need (Information Policy). The MIT Press.
Floridi, L., & Strait, A. (2020). Ethical Foresight Analysis: What it is and Why it is needed? Minds and Machines, 30, 77–97.
Gray, J., Gerlitz, C., & Bounegru, L. (2018). Data infrastructure literacy. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 2053951718786316.
Grebenshchikova, E. G., & Tishchenko, P. D. (2020). Digitized future of medicine: Challenges for bioethics. Filosofskie nauki – Russian journal of philosophical sciences, 63(2), 83–103. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-2-83-103
Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding “anticipatory governance”. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218–242.
Hedgecoe, A. M. (2010). Bioethics and the reinforcement of socio-technical expectations. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 163–186.
Hedgecoe, A. M. (2004). Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics, 18(2), 120–143.
Hockenberry, M. (2021). Redirected entanglements in the digital supply chain. Cultural Studies, 35(4-5), 641–662.
Joerin, A., Rauws, M., Fulmer, R., & Black, V. (2020). Ethical Artificial Intelligence for Digital Health Organizations. Cureus, 12(3), e7202.
Lucivero, F. (2016). Ethical Assessments of Emerging Technologies. Springer.
Marent, B., & Henwood, F. (2021). Digital health. Routledge.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2016). Tower of babel as the metaphor of hi-tech dynamics “semiotic attractor”. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki – Philosophy of Science and Technology, 21(1), 92–103. (In Russian).
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2018). Diagnosis of bioethics models. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 45, 75–82. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863Х/45/8
Milosevic, Z. (2019). Ethics in Digital Health: a deontic accountability framework. In 2019 IEEE 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) (pp. 105–111). IEEE.
Mithani, Z., Cooper, J., & Boyd, J. W. (2021). Race, Power, and COVID-19: A call for Advocacy within Bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 21(2), 11–18.
Morley, J. et al. (2020). The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review. Social Science & Medicine, 260, 113172.
Mulvenna, M. D. et al. (2021). Ethical Issues in Democratizing Digital Phenotypes and Machine Learning in the Next Generation of Digital Health Technologies. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1945–1960.
Nebeker, C., Torous, J., Bartlett Ellis, R. J. (2019). Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17(137), 1–7.
Prainsack, B. (2020). The political economy of digital data: introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies, 41(5), 439–446.
Ruotsalainen, P., & Blobel, B. (2020). Health Information Systems in the Digital Health Ecosystem—Problems and Solutions for Ethics, Trust and Privacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3006.
Schillinger, D., Chittamuru, D., & Ramírez, A. S. (2021). From “infodemics” to health promotion: A novel framework for the role of social media in public health. American journal of public health, 110(9), 1393–1396.
Schmietow, B., & Marckmann, G. (2019). Mobile health ethics and the expanding role of autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 22(4), 623–630.
Schneider, M., Vayena, E., & Blasimme, A. (2021). Digital bioethics: introducing new methods for the study of bioethical issues. Journal of medical ethics, medethics-2021-107387. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107387
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency ( pp. 59–68). Atlanta, GA, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
Shaw, J., & Donia, J. (2021). The Sociotechnical Ethics of Digital Health: A Critique and Extension of Approaches from Bioethics. Front Digit Health, 3, 725088.
Shaw, J., Rudzicz, F., Jamieson, T., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the implementation challenge. The Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(7), e13659.
Stützer, C. M., Welker, M., & Egger, M. (Eds.). (2018). Computational social science in the age of big data: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Herbert von Halem Verlag.
WHO. (2019). Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents
Winters, N., Venkatapuram, S., Geniets, A., & Wynne-Bannister, E. (2020). Prioritarian principles for digital health in low resource settings. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(4), 259–264.
Yeung, K. (2016). ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–19.
Yudin, B. G. (2011). Chelovek kak ob”ekt tekhnologicheskikh vozdeystviy [Man as an object of technological influences]. Chelovek, 3, 5–20.
( 337.61 kB ) 
( 322.76 kB )
Issue: 1, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 9 — 29
Downloads: 677