CULTURE AS A TEXT AND A PROJECT IN THE POST-SOVIET DISCOURSE (BY THE EXAMPLE OF KAZAKHSTAN)
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2023-1-30-47
The article presents an analysis of the semiotic aspects of significant texts and visual samples in the discursive art practice of post-Soviet Kazakhstan from the 1990s to nowadays. Literary centricity as a universal property of the entire post-Soviet visual culture is revealed on the previously unstudied material, which has intermedial and intertextual specifics. Art discourse is analyzed on the thematic and rhetorical levels, using verifiable scientific methods for these levels (content analysis, critical discourse analysis, the deconstruction method). As a result, the art objects of post-Soviet Kazakhstan, with the texts included in them, are analyzed in the article in the local historical and political context. Three projects were identified: Eurasian, Pan-Turkic, and liberal. As given intertexts, they determined the social and cultural boundaries and assessments of Kazakhstani artists. The projects, as written and proved in the article, had their historical foundations and still determine the real policy. The art ideas which appeared within the framework of these projects find a modern medial reflection. The work, for the first time in the scientific literature, proves that medial experiments in the practice of Kazakhstani contemporary art (texts and performances by Sergei Maslov, Ziyakhan Shaigeldinov (Shai-Ziya), Yerbol Meldibekov, Elena and Viktor Vorobyov, as well as modern actionists) documented the process of what is happening, reflected the traumatic nature of reality itself. For the first and only time in the public space of the country, as the article shows, by means of art practice, these experiments have criticized the quasi-real world of Kazakhstan's social and cultural space. In the Kazakh contemporary art itself, there have always been a lot of texts and subtexts, which are often directly included in art objects or have created them. The article traces that these were such text samples that generated their own meaning along with a visual idea at a given point in time, which can be called the creation of discourse. The work also reveals that representatives of contemporary Kazakh art used the aesthetics of the absurd as a mechanism for transforming post-Soviet everyday life into a different and new reality, similar to how it happened in absurdist fiction of the twentieth century. At the same time, visual samples in Kazakhstani practice of the late 20th and early 21st centuries became real cultural aggregators, they replaced the written text and influenced its functioning in culture. The article reveals the still practically unexplored usage of the aesthetics of television intermediality in Kazakhstani contemporary art. Art projects and manifestos of Kazakh artists of the 1990s and the 2000s are presented as unique socio-political discursive texts that predicted the specific socio-political realities of the post-Soviet country.
Keywords: art project, discursive practice, literary centricity, intermedial, intertextual, cultural text, performance, post-Soviet, aesthetics of absurd
References:
Aronson, O. (2007). Kommunikativnyy obraz (Kino. Literatura. Filosofiya) [Communicative image (Cinema. Literature. Philosophy)]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Artmeken Gallery. (2020). Durnye shutki: Katalog vystavok galerei Art meken, posvyashchennykh pravam cheloveka v Kazakhstane. 2017, 2018–2019, 2020 [Bad Jokes: Catalog of Artmeken Gallery exhibitions dedicated to human rights in Kazakhstan. 2017, 2018–2019, 2020]. Artmeken Gallery.
Asia Art. (1998). Art Discourse – 97. Asia Art.
Assmann, A. (2014). Der lange Schatten der Vergangenheit. Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
Auezov, M. M. (2016). Vremen svyazuyushchaya nit’ [The connecting thread of time]. ID “Zhibek Zholy”.
Burenina, O. D. (2015). Simvolistskiy absurd i ego traditsii v russkoy literature i kul’ture [Symbolist absurdity and its traditions in Russian literature and culture]. Alateya.
David-Fox, M. (2020). Crossing Borders, Modernity, Ideology, and Culture in Russia and the Soviet Union. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
Dobrenko, E. A. (2007). Politekonomiya sotsrealizma [Political economy of socialist realism]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Elnur. (2009). Vystavka “…segodnya zavtra…” v ramkakh foruma SKh RK “Iskusstvo protiv krizisa. Inventarizatsiya”. Katalog [Exhibition “... today tomorrow ...” within the framework of the forum of the Union of Artists of the Republic of Kazakhstan “Art against the crisis. Inventory”. Catalog]. Elnur.
Gizdatov, G., & Sopieva, B. (2018). Discourse and Identity in the Medial Space of Kazakhstan. Mediaobrazovanie – Media Education, 4, 29–38.
Gudkov, L., & Dubin, B. (2020). Literatura kak sotsial’nyy institut: Sbornik rabot [Literature as a social institution: Collection of works]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Ibrayeva, V. (2014). Iskusstvo Kazakhstana: Postsovetskiy period [Art of Kazakhstan: Post-Soviet period]. Tonkaya gran’.
Magnum. (2019). Neon Paradise. Artbook. Kul’tura potrebleniya i povsednevnosti v rabotakh sovremennykh kazakhstanskikh khudozhnikov s 1981 po 2019 g. [The culture of consumption and everyday life in the works of contemporary Kazakhstani artists from 1981 to 2019]. Magnum.
Markov, A. V. (2018). Postmodern kul’tury i kul’tura postmoderna. Lektsii po teorii kul’tury [Postmodernism of culture and postmodern culture. Lectures on the theory of culture]. RIPOL klassik.
Maslov, S. (2022). Dream Catcher. Exhibition catalog. Almaty. (In Russian).
McLuhan, G. M. (2017). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Kuchkovo pole. (In Russian).
Meldibekov, Y. E: (2016). Eternal Return: catalogue. Aspan Gallery.
Rudnev, V. P. (2017). Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ kul’tury XX veka [Encyclopedic Dictionary of Culture of the 20th Century]. Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus.
Vakhtel’, E. (2019). Sovremennyy Kazakhstan: ot slov k izobrazheniyu [Modern Kazakhstan: from words to images]. In Neon Paradise. Artbook. Kul’tura potrebleniya i povsednevnosti v rabotakh sovremennykh kazakhstanskikh khudozhnikov s 1981 po 2019 g. [The culture of consumption and everyday life in the works of contemporary Kazakhstani artists from 1981 to 2019] (pp. 171–175). Magnum.
Vorobyeva, E., Vorobyov, V. (2015). The artist sleeps: catalogue. Almaty, 2015. (In Russian).
Wodak, R. (2018). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Izd-vo “Gumanitarnyy tsentr”. (In Russian).
You Tube. (2022, April 10). Anti-Butya. Experimental electronic music by Vadim Ganzha Ehrlich “POP ART”. [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=830GlbNmPJc&t=1s
YouTube. (2022, April 10). Burocrat – Burocrat. [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0JRLDCVm9I
YouTube. (2022, April 10). Experimental electronic music by Vadim Ganzha Ehrlich “POP ART”. [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=830GlbNmPJc&t=1s
Yurchak, A. (2020). Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos’. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie [It was forever until it ended. The last Soviet generation]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
( 399.73 kB ) 
( 383.85 kB )
Issue: 1, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 30 — 47
Downloads: 1515