CYBERSEMIOTICS OF DATA ANALYSIS IN DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2022-4-9-27
The article deals with the problem of cybersemiotics of the analysis of educational data and human development data in digital educational environments. In the context of the formation of anthropological ideas about the learner as a subject of activity and the implementation of project-oriented education, the cybernetics of digital educational platforms remains in the logic of “didactics of object learning” and does not sufficiently contribute to the logic of “didactics of the development of the subject of cognition and activity”. The cybernetics of digital educational environments determines the cybersemiotics of educational data analysis: the pedagogical meaning and pedagogical tasks of development are often constructed in distorted optics in relation to a developing person. In the conditions of digital educational platforms and data analytics in digital environments as special cybersemiotic systems, a request is being formed for conceptual approaches that allow social research, technological programming, and pedagogical design of developing, learning environments. The aim of the research presented in the article is to study the semiosis of the analysis of educational data and data on human development in digital educational environments. The research was carried out in two aspects: the technological aspect – the study of digital artificial intelligence (AI) services on educational platforms of Russian education; the pedagogical aspect – the study of data competencies of teachers in working with the semiotics of data analysis in education. The article reveals how cybersemiotic AI systems of digital educational platforms (these systems are based on the concept of the pragmatic function in visual semiotics semiotics) become the object of management, the object of pedagogical analysis, the object of technological development in the design of digital artificial intelligence services of digital educational platforms, and the object of procurement for the development of digital educational environments. The study is significant for the development of the theory and practice of digital didactics and the methodology of cybersemiotics of digital educational environments. The prospects of the research are the development of a conceptual adjustment of cybersemiotic systems of AI services for data analysis in the context of the National Data Management System development.
Keywords: educational data analysis, digital educational platforms, digital educational environments, artificial intelligence (AI) services for educational data analysis, semiotic data analysis of human development and quality of education
References:
Ardashkin, I. B., & Surovtsev, V. A. (2019). Revisiting the issue of smart technologies epistemology and visualization: Does smart education lead to smart epistemology? ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 4, 9–35. https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-9-35 (In Russian).
Brier, S. (2012). Cybersemiotics: A New Foundation for a Transdisciplinary Theory of Consciousness, Cognition, Meaning and Communication.In L. Swan (Ed.), Origins of Mind. Biosemiotics (vol. 1, pp. 97–126). Springer Netherlands.
Bryzgalina, E. V. (2020). Social demand for creativity in the processes and (or) in the results of educational planning: What can be measured? Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science, 58, 272–277. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863Х/58/25 (In Russian).
Choshanov, M. A. (2021). Learning sciences perspective on engineering of distance learning. Part 1. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 30(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-2-33-49 (In Russian).
Fiofanova, O. A. (2022). Digital educational environment standards and data architecture in education. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya: Informatika i informatizatsiya obrazovaniya – Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 1(59), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.25688/2072-9014.2022.59.1.04 (In Russian).
Fiofanova, O. A., & Toporkova, E. S. (2020). International Analysis of National Databases of Educational Statistics and Analysis of the Technologies Educational Data in Countries of the World. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research, 10(3), 90–101.
Fiofanova, O. A., Panarin, A. A., & Klimin, S. V. (2020). The Management Structure of Digital Educational Data Systems and Organizational Approaches to Modeling and Analysis of Educational Data in the Countries of the World. Revista Tempos e Espacos Educacao, 13(32), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v13i32.14286
Foerster, N. (2003). Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition. Springer.
Lobova, S. V., & Pon’kina, E. V. (2021). Online Courses: To Accept Impossible to Ignore. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 30(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-23-35 (In Russian).
Lyadov, N. P. (2019). Cybersemiotics as a phenomenon of a transdisciplinary scientific paradigm. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki: teoriya i praktika, 1(3), 133–139. (In Russian).
Lyur’ya, N. A. (2020a). Semiotic Diagnostics: Methodology for Measuring Education
Transformation Efficiency. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 11, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-122-127 (In Russian).
Lyur’ya, N. A. (2020b). Semiotic measurement of social demand for creative education. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science, 58, 283–287. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/58/27 (In Russian).
Makarenko, A. N., Smyshlyaeva, L. G., Volchkova. I. V., Pozdeeva, S. I., & Semenova, N. A. (2021). Organization of educational environment at pedagogical university: Concepts and scenario of changes. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 30(10), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-10-129-136 (In Russian).
Makarenko, A. N., Smyshlyaeva, L. G., Zamyatina, O. M., & Minaev, N. N. (2020). Digital horizons in teacher education development. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 29(6), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-6-113-121 (In Russian).
Markelova, T. V. (2019). Sign-Pragmem as a Semiotic Dominant of the Axiological Field. Vestnik rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika – RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 10(3), 581–592. (In Russian).
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2021). Thought experiment on the axis of syntactics. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science, 62, 270-273. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/62/27 (In Russian).
Soshenko, I. I. (2020). Universities in the conditions of change: Request for social innovation. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 29(10), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-161-167 (In Russian).
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V., & Melik-Gaykazyan, M. V. (2019). Minerva and Janus: Symbols of worship of visual effects in modern education. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 4, 172–193. https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-172-193 (In Russian).
Polonnikov, A. A., Korchalova, N. D., & Korol, D. Y. (2021). Visualization of Culture: Educational Implications. Education & Pedagogy Journal, 2, 18–35. https://doi.org/10.23951/2782-2575-2021-2-18-35
Vikhman, V. V., & Romm, M. V. (2021). “Digital Twins” in Education: Prospects and Reality. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 30(2), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-2-22-32 (In Russian).
( 676.47 kB ) 
( 654.55 kB )
Issue: 4, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 9 — 27
Downloads: 468