GOTTLOB FREGE’S SEMANTICS IN MODERN ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2022-3-97-110
Frege’s well-known “semantic triangle” (sign – sense – reference) assumed ontological implications of Platonism, since the sense of the sign was understood here as an ideal, objective entity, by analogy with Plato’s eidos. One of the most fundamental opponents of Platonism in the tradition of analytic philosophy was the late Ludwig Wittgenstein, who proposed the concept of “meaning as use” in which the idea of sense (meaning) as some kind of stable, immutable, ideal essence was completely denied. However, in recent decades, analytic philosophy has shown a revival of attention to metaphysical problems. Moreover, the representatives of neo-Fregeanism blame Frege himself for the failure of the Platonist ontological program in the analytic philosophy of the twentieth century arguing that he expressed correct intuitions, but did not give weighty arguments in defense of his position. This allowed his opponents to take a dominant position in the modern philosophy of language. The article discusses the arguments of Jerrold Katz’s concept of linguistic Platonism against the views of the late Wittgenstein on the nature of the meaning of a linguistic expression. The author shows that the demonstration of these new arguments can make Frege’s semantics more viable in relation to criticism from the late Wittgenstein. The author invites modern Russian analytic philosophers to join the discussion on this topic, evaluate the weight of the arguments of each side, and draw their own conclusions based on the considerations presented in this article.
Keywords: Frege, Wittgenstein, Katz, sense, meaning, reference, language, semantics, syntax, grammar, word, sentence, naturalism, skepticism, metaphysics
References:
Carney, J. D., & Fitch, G. W. (1979). Can Russell Avoid Frege’s Sense? Mind, LXXXVIII(351), 384–393.
Frege, G. (1977). Smysl i denotat [Meaning and Denotation]. Translated from German. In A. I. Mikhaylov (Ed.), Semiotika i informatika [Semiotics and Informatics] (is. 8, pp. 181–210). VINITI.
Frege, G. (1997). Logicheskie issledovaniya [Logical investigations]. Translated from German. Vodoley.
Frege, G. (2000). The foundations of arithmetic. Vodoley. (In Russian).
Katz, J. (1990). The Metaphysics of Meaning. MIT Press.
Kusch, M. (2006). A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules. Acumen.
Ladov, V. (2019). Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and a Hierarchical Approach to Solving Logical Paradoxes. Filosofija. Sociologija, 30(1), 36–43.
Ladov, V. A. (2017). Logical Paradoxes Solution in Semantically Closed Language. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 104–119. (In Russian). DOI: 10.5840/eps201752233
Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge, 1932–35. Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophische Untersuhungen/Philosophical Investigation. The German text with an English translation by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Revisited 4th edition by P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Wiley-Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (2018). Filosofskie issledovaniya [Philosophical Investigations]. Translated from German. AST.
( 291.7 kB ) 
( 285.72 kB )
Issue: 3, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES. LANGUAGE MEANING AND LINGUISTIC REALISM IN CONTEXT OF ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY
Pages: 97 — 110
Downloads: 863