OPTICAL STRATEGIES OF NEW MEDIA: FROM PERSPECTIVISM TO DRIFTING GLANCE
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2022-3-9-38
A new ontology of seeing introduced by cinéma d’auteur and video art is proposed in the present paper. This ontology is associated with the transition from a centered position of subjectivity and perspectival construction of reality belonging to classical art – to a slowed-down vision and “drifting” glance introduced by new media. These slowed, layered, drifting and uncentered types of vision and continuous plans of moving image make it possible to shape a new sensitivity of “matter” in its complex variety and specificity. This is where experimental film and video art provoke and shape a new ontology of seeing. The study is focused on cinéma d’auteur (A. Tarkovsky, L. Visconti, A. Kiarostami, I. Bergman) and aesthetically and structurally related video art pieces (P. Rist, G. Hill, E.-L. Ahtila, Y. Fudong, et al.). These artists created specific ways of guiding viewer’s glance by means of moving image; exploring the aesthetic potential of camera travelling, mis-en-scène and montage; outlining the frontier of contemporary screen culture as a promising “symbolic form” of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. We analyze the shift from a static and centered position of the viewer of a classical painting (whose place is determined by the structure of the image’s perspective) – to the movie spectator, whose gaze, as Jean-Luc Nancy mentioned, “gets embedded” into the moving of the camera’s point of view (while the body remains motionless); and then to the drifting glance of the viewer of video art (walking in the space of a multi-channel installation or virtual reality). We argue that the transforming structures of the moving image and strategies of the gaze tend to shape new forms of sensibility in line with the current state of the communication society, the visuality of which is characterized by the ever-increasing speed and density of information, hybrid media flux, multi-layer texture, and fragmented image. In each section of the paper, we introduce one type of decentered image/glance, which is shaped in artistic experiment: (1) deep mise-en-scène (A. Bazin); (2) “empty center” (slowed-down or motionless camera losing interest in the hero); (3) “sliding glance” (smooth camera travelling, leveling all objects in significance); (4) “drifting glance” (associative poetic montage); and (5) multi-screen compositions (stratification of the moving image). In the 20th and 21st centuries, when information is transmitted, read, and accumulated at a supernormal speed, and reading it calls for a keen gaze, a diffused, drifting view turns out to be the mode of vision with which one can see the flux, dissimilation and ambiguity lying beneath the surface (screen) of contemporaneity. And artists who use moving image to create a model of a relaxed gaze and multi-faceted seeing accept this challenge; and the relaxed, decentered, drifting and wandering glance provokes the intensity of artistic seeking.
Keywords: new media, new media art, video art, cinema, experimental film, moving image, multimedia installation, multi-channel projection, virtual reality, symbolic form
References:
Agamben, G. (2009). “What Is an Apparatus?” and Other Essays. Translated by D. Kishik, & S. Pedatella. Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2017). The courage of hopelessness. Syg.ma. https://syg.ma/@valya_golev/dzhordzho-aghambien-khrabrost-lishiennykh-nadiezhdy (In Russian).
Bailenson, J. (2018). Experience on Demand: What Virtual Reality Is, How It Works, and What It Can Do. W. W. Norton & Company.
Baudry, J.-L., & Williams, A. (1974–1975). Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus. Film Quarterly, 28(2), 39–47.
Bird, R. (2021). Andrei Tarkovsky: Elements of Cinema. Garage Museum of Contemporary Art. (In Russian).
Cassirer, E. (2020). The Logic of the Cultural Sciences: Five Studies. Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. (In Russian).
Damisch, H. (1987). L’Origine de la perspective. Flammarion.
Deleuze, G. (2003). Cinema. Ad Marginem. (In Russian).
Dukhan, I. (2009). The Art of Duration: The Philosophy of Anri Bergson and an artistic experiment. Logos, 3, 185–203. (In Russian).
Dukhan, I. (2010). Perspectiva artificialis, antiperspektivizm i vremya [Perspectiva Artificialis, Antiperspectivism and Time]. In Kul’tura, epokha i stil’: klassicheskoe iskusstvo Zapada [Culture, era and style: classical art of the West] (pp. 368–400). Galart.
Elwes, C. (2015). Installation and Moving Image. Columbia University Press.
Flusser, V. (1983). Für eine Philosophie der Fotografie. European Photography.
Galison, P., & Daston, L. (2018). Objectivity. NLO. (In Russian).
Gleber, A. (1998). The Art of Taking a Walk. Princeton University Press.
Grau, O. (2003). Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. MIT.
Hubner, L. (2007). The Films of Ingmar Bergman: Illusions of Light and Darkness. Palgrave Macmillan.
Husserl, E. (1994). Collected works (vol. I). Gnosis. (In Russian).
Jay, M. (1993). Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. University of California Press.
Kosuth, J. (1991). Art after Philosophy and after: Collected Writings 1960–1990 (pp. 13–32). MIT Press.
Kristeva, J. (1994). Le Temps Sensible, Proust et l’Expérience Littéraire. Gallimard.
Kukulin, I. (2015). Kak sovetskiy montazh stal metodom neofitsial’noy kul’tury [How Soviet montage became a method of unofficial culture]. NLO.
Lavin, S. (2011). Kissing Architecture. Princeton University Press.
Mann, T. (2013). Death in Venice. AST. (In Russian).
Manovich, L. (2016). What is Digital Cinema? In S. Denson, & J. Leyda (Eds,), Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st-Century Film. REFRAME Books, https://reframe.sussex.ac.uk/post-cinema/1-1-manovich/
Manovich, L. (2018). The Language of New Media. Garage. (In Russian).
McLuhan, M. (2018). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Kuchkovo pole. (In Russian).
Moholy-Nagy, L. (1938). A new instrument of vision. https://prophotos-ru.livejournal.com/1911029.html (In Russian).
Molchanov, V. (1988). Vremya i soznanie. Kritika fenomenologicheskoy filosofii [Time and consciousness. Criticism of Phenomenological Philosophy]. Vysshaya shkola.
Nancy, J.-L. (2021). Abbas Kiarostami: The evidence of film. Garage Museum of Contemporary Art. (In Russian).
Noys, B. (2005). Tulse Luper Database: Peter Greenaway, the New Media Object and the Art of Exhaustion. Image and narrative. http://www.imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/tulseluper/noys.htm
Panofsky, E. (1927). Die Perspective als ’symbolische Form. Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg, 1, 258–330.
Panofsky, E. (1966). Early Netherlandish Painting, Its Origins and Character. Harvard University Press.
Paul, C. (2003). Digital Art. Thames & Hudson.
Quasha, G., & Stein, C. (2009). An Art of Limina: Gary Hill’s Works and Writings. Ediciones Polígrafa.
Rush, M. (2018). New media in art. Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
Savchenkova, N. (2013). Elementy poetiki psikhoanaliza [Elements of the poetics of psychoanalysis]. ERGO.
Seleznev, M. (2021). Venetsianskie lovushki: VR-programma Venetsianskogo kinofestivalya [Venetian traps: VR program of the Venice Film Festival]. Iskusstvo kino. https://kinoart.ru/texts/venetsianskie-lovushki-vr-programma-venetsianskoy-biennale
Shanken, E. (2009). Art and Electronic Media. London: Phaidon.
Shklovsky, V. (1985). Za 60 let: Raboty o kino [For 60 years: Works on cinema]. Iskusstvo.
Shuripa, S. (2021). Smysl i deystvie v iskusstve vtoroy poloviny XX veka [Meaning and Action in the Art of the Second Half of the 20th century]. Pal’mira.
Tarkovsky, A. (1967). Zapechatlennoe vremya [Captured Time]. Voprosy kinoiskusstva, 10. http://tarkovskiy.su/texty/Tarkovskiy/Statia1967.1.html
Tarkovsky, A. (1992). Poyasneniya rezhissera k fil’mu “Solyaris” [Director’s explanations for the film “Solaris”]. Kinovedcheskie zapiski, 14. http://www.tarkovskiy.su/texty/Tarkovskiy/Solaris02.html
Virilio, P. (2004). The vision machine. Nauka. (In Russian).
Walley, J. (2020). Cinema Expanded. Avant-garde Film in the Age of Intermedia. Oxford University Press.
Wands, B. (2006). Art of the Digital Age. Thames & Hudson.
Youngblood, G. (1970). Expanded Cinema. E.P. Dutton & co., Inc.
Zizek, S. (2013). Slavoy Zhizhek: Kogda vas ocharovyvaet fil’m, on vedet sebya kak izvrashchenets [Slavoj Zizek: When You are Fascinated by the Film, It Behaves like a Pervert]. RIA Novosti. https://ria.ru/20130419/716073452.html
( 404.23 kB ) 
( 393.56 kB )
Issue: 3, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES. ‘OPTICS’ FOR VISUAL DOMINANTS IN NEW PRACTICES OF THE VISUAL
Pages: 9 — 38
Downloads: 757