AXIOLOGICAL COMPONENT IN THE STRUCTURE OF VISUAL IMAGES OF THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2022-1-75-89
The article is dedicated to the possibilities of studying the axiological attitude towards the urban environment on the basis of user-generated content in social networks. The visual image of the city in the context of digital footprints is considered to be a cognitive model of the urban environment, which reflects interpretative and projective constructions – subjective ideas about the environment loci that become adopted “places” and express certain axiological attitudes and expectations of individuals. The article shows that the content of social networks implements, first of all, a communicative function – between users, and between them and the city itself. Interpersonal communication and communication with the city are conditions for constructing personal identity and for the city existence and change. The city exists, in particular, as an urban identity, in forms of adopted places of urban space. The described tendency of the urban environment appropriation is quite clearly expressed in the visual materials of urban communities, which appear as a new and significant phenomenon. The analysis of user-generated content in social networks shows that photographs poorly represent the city dwellers’ vital values of everyday life, but they express their existential needs. The dominant value-semantic meaning of the urban environment is its ability to be developed and appropriated by a person
Keywords: city image, axiological analysis, urban environment, social networks
References:
Augé, М. (1992). Non-lieux, introduction à uneantropologie de la surmodernité. Le Seuil.
Avanesov, S. S. (2020). City as a cultural myth. In Mif v istorii, politike, kul’ture [Myth in history, politics, culture] (pp. 57–61). Lomonosov Moscow State University Branch in Sevastopol. (In Russian).
Banks, M. (2001). Visual Methods in Social Research. Routledge.
Chursina, Yu. (2014). “Leave from” vs “Leave for”. The quality of the urban environment as a factor of the population’s migration attitudes. Sotsiologiya vlasti – Sociology of power, 2, 142–164. (In Russian).
Dakhin, A. V. (2011). City as a place of remembrance. Analitika kul’turologii – Analytics of Cultural Studies, 19, 164–172. (In Russian).
de Certeau, M. (2013). The practice of everyday life. European University at St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
Dunaeva, D. O. (2021). Discursive practices of citizens as a communicative mechanism for the formation of an intersubjective image of a comfortable city (experience of field research). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2021. 60. P. 137–151. In Russian.
Ezhova, N. A. (2005). Personal comfort parameters in the urban visual landscape. Analitika kul’turologii – Analytics of Cultural Studies, 2(4), 43–58. (In Russian).
Fedorov, A. V., & Levikov, V. V. (2015). Urban space as the system of visual discourse markers. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 1(3), 51–55. (In Russian).
Gehl, J. (2012). Cities for people. Al’pina Pablisher. (In Russian).
Gehl, J., & Gemzøe, L. (2012). New city spaces. Kontsern “Krost”. (In Russian).
Gorina, E. A., & Burdyak, A. Ya. (2015). A look at the quality of life of the population through the prism of the urban environment. Sotsiologiya goroda – Sociology of the City, 2, 11–31. (In Russian).
Gornova, G. V. (2006). The experience of the city. In: Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Ezhegodnik [Humanitarian research. Yearbook] (pp. 15–21). Omsk State Pedagogical University. (In Russian).
Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (2004). The handbook of visual analysis. Sage Publications. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-handbook-of-visual-analysis
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Wiley-Blackwell.
Massey, D. (2005). For space. Sage.
Olechnicki, K. (2003). Antropologia obrazu. Fotografia jako metoda, przedmiot i medium nauk społecznych. Oficyna Naukowa.
Pirogov, S. V. (2013). Contours of visual studies of the city. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 376, 59–63. (In Russian).
Punina, K. A., & Romashova, M. V. (2010). Visual markers of the city: On the issue of the formation of urban identity. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya – Bulletin of the Perm University. Political Science, 4(12), 56–64. (In Russian).
Radchenko, D. A. (2019). After the ball: How to evaluate the effects of beautification using anthropology. Fol’klor i antropologiya goroda – Folklore and Anthropology of the City, 2(3–4), 270–291. (In Russian).
Shchekotin, E. V., Myagkov, M. G., Goiko, V. L., Kashpur, V. V., & Kovarzh, G. Yu. (2020). Subjective Measurement of Population Ill-Being / Well-Being in the Russian Regions Based on Social Media Data. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny – Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 1, 78–116. (In Russian).
Shchekotin, E., Goiko, V., Myagkov, M., & Dunaeva, D. (2021). Assessment of quality of life in regions of Russia based on social media data. Journal of Eurasian Studies. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/18793665211034185
Skopina, M. V. (2013). The phenomenon of “place” and “no-place” in the post-industrial city. Vestnik MGSU – Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture, 8(1), 66–71. I(n Russian).
Tuan, Yi-Fu. (1977). Espace et lieu. La perspective de l’expérience. Paris.
Tykanova, E., & Khokhlova, A. (2013). Trajectories of self-organization of local communities in situations of challenging urban spaces. Sotsiologiya vlasti – Sociology of Power, 2, 104–122. (In Russian).
( 1.16 MB ) 
( 1.13 MB )
Issue: 1, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 75 — 89
Downloads: 698