SEMIOLOGY OF PRELITERATE ASTRAL FIGURES
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2021-4-81-116
For a long time, ideograms and graphemes of the Neolithic period were primarily the particular archaeological, ethnological, cultural, and theological interest. However, as archaeoastronomy consolidated its disciplinary positions, they were increasingly becoming a matter of attention for historians of astronomy. Indisputable alignments of archaeological remains toward the points of midsummer and midwinter risings and settings of the sun shows conclusively that people of the Bronze Age were expected to have a still greater knowledge of astronomy. The broad truth of the cyclical movements of the points of rising and setting and their correlation with the cycle of growth in nature was certainly known from very early times. That, in turn, means that the thorough understanding of the oldest symbolism to have come down to us – if it, in fact, was so – is only possible when a researcher is familiar at least with spherical astronomy. At their highest stage of development the Bronze Age people certainly knew the cardinal points of the horizon; they were aware of the tropical year as a cycle of repetition of the position of the sun against the horizon; they knew about solstices and equinoxes; some of them distinguished between azimuth positions of the highest and the lowest moon; they built monumental architecture for regular observations of the sun and the moon, and even invented writing, though not everywhere. It would be hard to imagine that such a complicated system of ideas and actions was created all at once, without an evolutionary accumulation of that rather complex knowledge and a concatenation of insights which came together to make the final discovery embodied in stone monuments of the Bronze Age. The given circumstance forces us to look closely into ideograms of the pre-Bronze Ages, namely the Neolithic and the Aeneolithic ones. Is it possible to find there some traces of formalization of primary astronomical observations which could be assimilated, developed, and widely adopted by representatives of the Bronze Age? This study attempts to identify among the corpus of Neolithic symbols, graphemes, and ideograms those of them that could be supposedly used as denotations for astronomical meanings. The article uses the system of Neolithic meanings developed by Ariel Golan as the reference body. The astronomical part of the study is based on the gradualist concept of the Western Zodiac by Alexander Gurshtein. In the course of a semiological analysis of Neolithic ideograms, categories of symbols and signs have been identified that are difficult to interpret from the point of view of archaeological and ethnographic data. However, they show clear signs of correlation with the rhythms of the seasons. Among these are, for instance: the so-called sign of ‘two suns,’ ‘f-shaped’ signs, and ‘four-part-binary symbols.’ Analysis of their probable semantics suggests that ‘protozodiac’ concept could have been preceded by a simpler binary division of the year indicated by opposition between the winter and summer solstices. In this regard, clarifications, concerning semantics and symbolic meanings of the first zodiacal quartet are included in the hypothesis by Gurshtein.
Keywords: archaeoastronomy, early agricultural Neolithic culture, Neolithic symbolism, zodiac, first zodiacal quartet, ritual, Neolithic religion
References:
Barthes, R. (1975). Osnovy semiologii [Elements of semiology]. Translated from English. In M. Ya. Basin, & E. Ya. Polyakov (Eds.), Strukturalizm: “za” i “protiv” [Structuralism: Pros and cons’(114–163). Progress.
Devlet, M. A. (2001). Mirovozzrenie drevnego naseleniya Evrazii [Worldview of the ancient population of Eurasia]. Staryy Sad.
Eco, U. (2006). Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu [The missing structure. Introduction into Semiology]. Translated from Italian. Symposium.
Golan, A. (1993). Mif i simvol [Myth and symbol]. Russlit.
Gurshtein, A. (2017). The puzzle of the western zodiac: Its wisdom and evolutionary leaps. A painful ascent to the truth. AuthorHouse.
Jakobson, R. (1990). Dva aspekta yazyka i dva tipa afaticheskikh narusheniy. Teoriya metafory [Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances]. In N. D. Arutyunova (Ed.), Teoriya metafory [The theory of metaphor] (pp. 110–132). Progress.
Kornienko, Т. V. (2017). Development of views on the study of symbolic objects, ideology and public consciousness of the Near East communities during the transition to the Neolithic Period. Vestnik of Udmurt University. History and Philology Series, 27(4), 510–515. (In Russian).
Larichev, V. E. (1992). Svyatilishche sozvezdiya Malaya Medveditsa (astronomicheskie aspekty naskal’nykh izobrazheniy i astral’nye korni mifologii narodov Sibiri) [Sanctuary of the Ursa Minor constellation (Astronomical aspects of rock carvings and astral roots of the mythology of Siberian peoples). In V. E. Larichev (Ed.), Severnaya Aziya i sosednie territorii v Srednie veka [North Asia and neighboring territories in the Middle Ages] (pp. 8–25). Nauka, Siberian Branch.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (2007). Mifologiki: Chelovek golyy [The naked man: Mythologiques]. Translated from French. Fluid.
Lotman, Yu. М.(1987).A Few Thoughts on the Typology of Cultures. Cultural Languages and Problems of Translatability. Moscow: Nauka, 1987. P. 3–11. In Russian.
Luriya, А. R. (1962). Vysshie korkovye funktsii cheloveka i ikh narusheniya pri lokal’nykh porazheniyakh mozga [Higher cortical functions in man and their disturbances in local brain lesions]. Moscow University Press.
Marshack, A. (1964). Lunar notation on Upper Paleolithic remains. Science, 146(3645), 743–745.
North, J. (1966). Stonehenge. A new interpretation of prehistoric man and the cosmos. The Free Press.
North, J. (2020). Kosmos. Illyustrirovannaya istoriya astronomii i kosmologii [Cosmos. An illustrated history of astronomy and cosmology]. Translated from English. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Potemkina, T. M., & Obridko, V. N. (2002). Astronomiya drevnikh obshchestv [Astronomy of ancient societies]. Nauka.
Rabinovich, Е. G. (1978). Tip kalendarya i tipologiya kul’tury [Type of calendar and typology of culture]. Istoriko-astronomicheskie issledovaniya, XIV, 141–154.
Rybakov, B. А. (1965). Kosmogoniya i mifologiya zemledel’tsev eneolita [Cosmogony and mythology of the Eneolithic farmers]. Sovetskaya arkheologiya, 1, 24–47.
Toporov, V. N. (1988). O rituale. Vvedenie v problematiku [On the ritual. Introduction to the problem]. In E. S. Novik (Ed.), Arkhaicheskiy ritual v fol’klornykh i ranneliteraturnykh pamyatnikakh [Archaic ritual in folk and early literary monuments] (pp. 7–60). Nauka.
( 1.25 MB ) 
( 1.22 MB )
Issue: 4, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 81 — 116
Downloads: 683