IMAGES OF EARTH: CONCEPTION OF GEOGRAPHICAL IMAGINATION IN DENIS COSGROVE’S CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2021-4-36-57
“Geographical imagination” is a very strange terminological combination. It might arouse suspicion in academically respectable geography as a consequence of epistemological dangers it presumably posed. The article examines the concept of geographical imagination in the research works of the distinguished British cultural geographer and historian of cartography Denis Cosgrove (1948–2008). Cosgrove has no advanced and systematic theory of geographical imagination, but it is the main focus of his studies. For Cosgrove, the question about geographical imagination is fundamental since, in his cultural geography, imagination becomes virtually a “transcendental condition” of every geographical act as an act of representing Earth and its parts in various geographical images (maps, paintings, landscapes, photographs, urban plans and city parks, digital representations). The article considers some basic characteristics of geographical imagination and the rich field of geographical image in Cosgrove’s cultural geography. 1. Geographical images are not some entities, spontaneously generated by the “productive capacity of imagination” in the interior of the “Cartesian Theater” and remaining closed within the borders of its scene. Geographical imagination is a name of a complex mechanism, whose work we find so hard to understand and describe (if this is even possible). In this work, hands, eyes, minds, and technologies are involved. The mechanism of imagination generates externalia (images of Earth). 2. Geographical images create new (empirically unimplementable) horizons of visibility, conspicuity, and intelligibility. For example, according to Christian Jacob, “the map presents a schema, visual as well as intellectual, that takes the place of an impossible sensorial vision”. 3. Geographical images are one of the “privileged places”, and also expressions, of graphic experiments, experiments of imagination, during which new ways of seeing and thinking Earth have been tested and are being investigated further. Geographical imagination is work on visual representations of not only the empirical order, but also conceptual structures. 4. Geographical images cannot be reduced to pure and neutral representations of geographic facts. In relation to the “factual” level, it demonstrates visual and semantic redundancy. For Cosgrove, the history of geographical imagination is also the history of “investment” in geographical images that human fears, hopes, desires, metaphysical speculations, religious pursuits, and moral sensitivity make. Considered as a whole, Cosgrove’s research in the field of cultural geography is one big act of an ontological, epistemological, cultural, and even moral rehabilitation of images.
Keywords: imagination, geographical imagination, geographical image, geography, Denis Cosgrove, map, cartography, image
References:
Agnew, J., Duncan, J. S., & Staszak, J.-F. (2009). Denis E. Cosgrove (1948–2008). Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 552–559.
Berger, J. (2012). Iskusstvo videt’ [Ways of Seeing]. Translated from English by E. Shpraga. Klaudberri.
Berlyant, А. М. (1986). Obrazy prostranstva: karta i informatsiya [Images of space: map and information]. Mysl’.
Berlyant, А. М. (2014). Kartografiya: uchebnik [Cartography: Textbook]. ID KKhU.
Brotton, J. (2017). Velikie karty [Great maps]. Translated from English by V. Tret’yakov, E. Ibragimov, & L. Buravchikova. Izdatel’stvo «E».
Certeau, М. (2013). Izobretenie povsednevnosti [The practice of everyday life] (Vol. 1). Translated from English by D. Kalugin, & N. Movnina. European University at Saint Petersburg.
Claudel, Р. (1995). Glaz slushaet [The eye listens]. Translated from French by A. Kulish. Folio.
Cohen, J. C., & Elkins-Tanton, L. T. (2017). Earth. Bloomsbury.
Cosgrove, D. (1989). Geography is everywhere: Culture and symbolism in human landscapes. In D. Gregory, & R. Walford (Eds.), Horizons in Human Geography (118–135). Macmillan.
Cosgrove, D. (1993). The Palladian landscape: geographical change and its cultural representations in sixteenth century Italy. University of Leicester Press; Penn State Press.
Cosgrove, D. (1994). Contested global visions: One-world, whole-earth, and the Apollo space photographs. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), 270–294.
Cosgrove, D. (1998). Social formation and symbolic landscape: With new introduction. The University of Wisconsin Press.
Cosgrove, D. (1999). Introduction: Mapping meaning. In D. Cosgrove (Ed.), Mappings (pp. 1–23). Reaktion.
Cosgrove, D. (2001). Apollo’s eye: a cartographic genealogy of the earth in the western imagination. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
Cosgrove, D. (2005a). Apollo’s eye: A cultural geography of the Globe. Hettner Lecture I. June 2005. Yumpu. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/4791236/apollos-eye-a-cultural-geography-of-the-globe-
Cosgrove, D. (2005b). Maps, mapping, modernity: art and cartography in the twentieth century. Imago Mundi, 57(1), 35–54.
Cosgrove, D. (2007a). Images of Renaissance cosmography, 1450–1650. In D. Woodward (Ed.), The history of cartography (Vol. 3, pp. 55–98). University of Chicago Press.
Cosgrove, D. (2007b). Mapping the world. In J. R. Akerman, & R. W. Karrow (Eds.), Maps: Finding our place in the world (pp. 65–116). University of Chicago Press.
Cosgrove, D. (2008). Geography and vision: Seeing, imagining and representing the world. I.B. Tauris.
Cosgrove, D., & Fox, W. L. (2010). Photography and flight. Reaktion Books.
Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2018). Obyektivnost’ [Objectivity]. Translated from English by T. Varkhotov, S. Gavrilenko, & A. Pisarev. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Dekker, Е. (2007). Globes in Renaissance Europe. In D. Woodward (Ed.), The history of cartography (Vol. 3, pp. 135–159). University of Chicago Press.
Delano Smith, C., et al. (2009). Reflections on the career of Denis Cosgrove 1948–2008. Cultural Geographies, 16(1), 5–28.
Della Dora, V. (2008). Denis Cosgrove, ‘Uomo Universale’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 381–388.
Della Dora, V. (2009). Obituary Denis Cosgrove (1948–2008). Imago Mundi, 61(1), 97–100.
Della Dora, V. (2020). The mantle of the Earth: Genealogies of a geographical metaphor. University of Chicago Press.
Edney, M. H. (2019). Cartography: The ideal and its history. University of Chicago Press.
Gregory, D. (2009a). Geographical imagination. In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. J. Watts, & S. Whatmore (Eds.), The dictionary of human geography (pp. 282–285). 5th edition. Wiley-Blackwell.
Gregory, D. (2009b). Imaginative geographies. In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. J. Watts, & S. Whatmore (Eds.), The dictionary of human geography (pp. 369–371). 5th edition. Wiley-Blackwell.
Harley, B. (2001). The new nature of maps: Essays in the history of cartography. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ivanov, K. (2018). The rise of the city plans. Chelovek, 1, 166–179. (In Russian).
Jacob, C. (2006). The sovereign map: The theoretical approaches in cartography through history. University of Chicago Press.
Kozintsev, G. M. (1973). Prostranstvo tragedii. Dnevnik rezhissera [The space of tragedy]. Iskusstvo.
Nesterov, A. (2015). Geograficheskie karty rannego Novogo vremeni kak estetizatsiya i kontseptualizatsiya reprezentirovannogo prostranstva [Early modern geographic maps as anesthetization and conceptualization of represented space]. In I. Vidugirite, P. Lavrinets, G. Mikhaylova (Eds.), Geterotopii: miry, granitsy, povestvovanie [Heterotopias: Worlds, borders, narratives] (pp. 88–110). Vilnius University.
Petrova, М. (2015). Macrobius’ commentary on the ‘Dream of Scipio’ and its relevant contexts. ΣΧΟΛΗ (Schole). Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 2(9), 306–315. (In Russian).
Sloterdijk, P. (2007). Sfery: Makrosferologiya [Spheres: Macrosferology] (Vol. 2). Translated from English by K. Loshchevskiy. Nauka.
Woodward, D. (2007). Cartography and the Renaissance: Continuity and change. In D. Woodward (Ed.), The history of cartography (Vol. 3, pp. 3–24). University of Chicago Press.
( 384.19 kB ) 
( 378.45 kB )
Issue: 4, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 36 — 57
Downloads: 974