MAIN APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF VISUAL THINKING
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2021-4-256-272
Studies of visual thinking represent one of the trends expanding our views on the principles and mechanisms of human thinking. The present paper outlines three main approaches to the study of visual thinking. The psychological approach has been set apart based on the analysis of works by Rudolf Arnheim who demonstrated that visual thinking might be understood in terms of the psychology of thinking. Arnheim presented visual thinking as a mode of thinking that allows singling out the essential – common for the whole class – properties of the observed objects. The legitimacy and relevance of the psychological approach can be circumstantially proved by a large number of visual intuitions in philosophical epistemology. The neuroaesthetic approach has been singled out based on the analysis of works by Semir Zeki and V. S. Ramachandran. The founders of neuroaesthetics came to the conclusion that visual perception is not the reflection of an object by the eye, but an active brain activity aiming at completion or modelling of an object in accordance with certain laws such as the peak shift principle, the law of isolation, the law of symmetry, etc. Developing the ideas of neuroaesthetics, we can note that these laws of visual perception are suitable for describing the procedures of abstraction and idealization. A broader interpretation of the laws of visual perception and their application to intellectual procedures seem to be a promising perspective. The gnoseological approach has been examined on the example of the notion of “point of view”, which refers both to visual and abstract thinking. Johann Martin Chladenius used this notion in the methodology of historical knowledge, treating the latter as a vision of the past under a certain angle. Another way of developing the “point of view” is presented in Frank Ankersmit’s conception. Being a representative of the narrative philosophy of history, Ankersmit interprets the “point of view” as a narrative substance which allows integrating separate utterances into a single historical narrative. The notion of “point of view” demonstrates that historical knowledge is treated as a certain vision of the past and that historical research is interpreted in terms of visual thinking. All the three mentioned approaches point out a strong link between the visual and the abstract and thus open up a particular perspective on the study of human thinking, which may, for instance, be of interest in the study of artificial intelligence.
Keywords: visual thinking, neuroaesthetics, “point of view”, Rudolf Arnheim, V. S. Ramachandran, Semir Zeki, Frank Ankersmit
References:
Ankersmit, F. R. (2003). Narrativnaya logika. Semanticheskiy analiz yazyka istorikov [Narrative logic. A semantic analysis of the historian’s language]. Translated from English by O. Gavrishina, A. Oleynikov. Ideya-Press.
Ankersmit, F. R. (2021). A narrativist revival?Journal of the Philosophy of History. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341456
Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. University of California Press.
Arnheim, R. (1974). Iskusstvo i vizual’noe vospriyatie [Art and visual perception]. Translated from English by V. N. Samokhin. Progress.
Arnheim, R. (1995). Novye ocherki po psikhologii iskusstva [New essays on the psychology of art]. Translated from English. Prometey.
Artamonova, Yu. D. (2010). I.M. Khladenius i iskhodnye momenty istoriografii XIX veka [J. M. Chladenius and the initial moments of the 19th century historiography]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, XXIII(1), 189–192.
Bai Hui. (2020). The exploration of Arnheim‘s theory of visual perception in the field of art appreciation and review in junior high school. Learning & Education, 9(2), 139–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v9i2.1428
Chladenius, J. (2010). Vseobshchaya nauka istoriya [The universal science of history]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki – Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, XXIII(1), 193–223.
Cohoe, C. (2016). When and why understanding needs phantasmata: A moderate interpretation of Aristotle’s De Memoria and De Anima on the role of images in intellectual activities. Phronesis, 61(3), 337–372. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341311
Correa-Herran, I., Aleem, H., & Grzywacz, N. M. (2020). Evolution of neuroaesthetic variables in portrait paintings throughout the Renaissance. Entropy, 22(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22020146
Folgero, P. O., Johansson, C., & Stokkedal, L. H. (2021). The superior visual perception hypothesis: Neuroaesthetics of cave art. Behavioral Sciences, 11(6), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11060081
Gavrilenko, S. M. (2021). Thought experiment and cartography: Points of convergence. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 62, 265–269. (In Russian).
Kellner, H. (2018). A Dutchman views the world – Ankersmit as a reader. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 12(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341403
Losev, A. F. (2000). Istoriya antichnoy estetiki [History of ancient aesthetics] (Vol. 2). AST; Folio.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2021). Thought Experiment on the Axis of Syntactics. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science 62, 270–273. (In Russian).
Paul, H. J., & Veldhuizen, A. P. van. (2018). A retrieval of historicism: Frank Ankersmit’s philosophy of history and politics. History and Theory, 57(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12045
Ramachandran, V. S. (2006). Rozhdenie razuma. Zagadki nashego soznaniya [The emerging mind]. Translated from English by A. Logvinskaya. Olimp-Biznes.
Russell, F. (2020). Neuroaesthetics and critique. Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy, 33, 66–82. https://www.parrhesiajournal.org/parrhesia33/parrhesia33_russell.pdf
Shestakova, M. (2015). Neuroaesthetics of Ramachandran and Philosophy of Science. Filosofskie nauki – Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 11, 40–47. (In Russian).
Shipovalova 2021 – Shipovalova, L. D. (2021). The special merit of thought experiment. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 62, 278–281. (In Russian).
Tamm, M., & Zeleňák, E. (2018). In a parallel world: An introduction to Frank Ankersmit’s philosophy of history. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 12(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341401
Varkhotov, T. A. (2021). From Imagination to Map: Non-Discursive Foundations of Thought Experiment. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 62, 250–259. (In Russian).
Wassiliwizky, E., & Menninghaus, W. (2021). Why and how should cognitive science care about aesthetics? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(6), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.03.008
Zeki, S., Bao Yan, & Pöppel, E. (2020). Neuroaesthetics: The art, science, and brain triptych. PsyCh Journal, 9, 427–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.383
( 374.28 kB ) 
( 369.76 kB )
Issue: 4, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 256 — 272
Downloads: 784