THE CUZCO SCHOOL PAINTING AS A WORLDVIEW MODEL
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2021-1-124-141
The article considers the phenomenon of the Cuzco School of painting (one of the most original phenomena of cultural life not only in the Andean region, but also in Latin America in general during the colonial period) as a reflection of the worldview of the Indians of the colonial period. Indians themselves created paintings, although under the control of the Spanish clergy, in order to Christianize the local population, which makes these visual sources important. Despite the significance of the topic and the number of studies devoted to it, many aspects of the problem have not yet been fully interpreted. In many ways, this applies to ideological and worldview aspects. In this regard, the author analyses Cuzco paintings in semiotic, rather than purely artistic, terms: what aspects of the worldview are behind a particular symbol and motif. To solve this problem, the author analyzes a number of paintings of the Cuzco School (the most promising for the research) in order to identify the worldview elements – reflected in the images, motifs, and colors – the paintings contain. It is impossible to conduct such an analysis without using comparative data from other sources on the peculiarities of the Indian worldview, especially written ones. The simultaneous creation of both groups of sources allows drawing relevant parallels with respect to the same research objects. For the convenience and clarity of the analysis, the author typologizes worldview elements based on the principle of origin. Traditionally, they can be divided into Indian, Spanish-Christian, and mixed. The author also gives a brief overview of the main artistic traditions that influenced the formation of the school (Spanish Baroque, Indian beliefs and elements of art, etc.). The analysis of the artistic and stylistic features of the works from the point of view of their ideological content allows drawing the following conclusions. Firstly, many of the symbols and motifs of the Cuzco School go directly back to pre-Hispanic Indian beliefs. Secondly, many of these symbols and motifs are not explicit yet can be read without much effort. Thirdly, the Spanish-Christian elements are largely external, declarative in nature, with a number of concessions to pagan motives. All this suggests that the worldview of the Indians of the colonial period was complex and multi-faceted in its composition. At the same time, it is important to note that none of the worldview systems appears in its original form because of the dramatic process of the collision of these two systems and the creation of a new one on their basis. Nevertheless, based on the analysis of the paintings of the Cuzco School, there is reason to believe that in this mosaic system of the Indian worldview, pre-Hispanic elements can be considered pre-existing. All this testifies to a genuine synthesis of worldviews and to the mestizo character of the Cusco School as a cultural and social phenomenon.
Keywords: Cuzco School, history and culture of Peru, colonial period, religion
References:
Argumedo, R. S. (2013). Cusco y la herencia del barroco andino. Municipalidad del Cusco.
Batalla Rosado, J. J., & Rojas, J. L. de. (2008). La religión azteca. Editorial Trotta.
Benavente Velarde, T. (1995). Historia del arte cusqueño. Pintores cusqueños de la colonia. Municipalidad del Qosqo.
Bosisio, M. A., & Penhos, M. (2017). Vírgenes y wakas: mecanismos de la representación en las imágenes de culto coloniales. Mestizajes en diálogo. VII encuentro internacional sobre barroco (pp. 285–293). Fundación Visión Cultural.
Cajías de la Vega, F. (2004). Barroco y nacionalismo inca. Barroco y fuentes de la diversidad cultural. Memoria del II encuentro internacional (pp. 151–153). Viceministerio de Cultura, Unión Latina.
Calancha, A. de la. (1977). Crónica moralizada. T. IV. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.
Campbell, A. B. (2009). El sincretismo en la pintura de la Escuela Cuzqueña, Cultura (Lima, Peru), 23:001-100, 101–111.
Carlson, U. (2010). Imágenes y símbolos en el antiguo Perú: una contribución a la Interpretación figurativa de sus tejidos. http://uwe-carlson.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Interpretación-del-simbolismo-en-antiguos-tejidos-peruanos1-1.pdf
Cobo, B. (1892). Historia del Nuevo Mundo. T. III. Imp. de E. Rasco.
Cohen, S. A. (2015). Pintura colonial cuzqueña. El esplendor del arte en los Andes. Haynanka ediciones.
Esquivias, B. (2015). Introducción al arte barroco. El gran teatro del mundo. Ediciones Cátedra.
Garcilaso de la Vega, I. (1985). Comentarios reales. T. II. Biblioteca Ayacucho.
Gareis, I. (1999). Wie Engel und Teufel in die Neue Welt kamen. Imaginationen von Gut und Böse im kolonialen Amerika. Paideuma: Mitteilungen zur Kulturkunde, 45, 257–273.
Gisbert, T. (2004). Iconografía y mitos indígenas en el arte. Edit. Gilbert y CIA.
Iwasaki, F. (2018). ¡Aplaca, Señor, tu ira! Lo maravilloso y lo imaginario en Lima colonial. FCE, Fundación Biblioteca Manuel de Javier Rodriguez Ganuza.
Kusunoki, R., & Wuffarden, L. E. (Eds.) (2016a). Arte colonial. MALI.
Kusunoki, R., & Wuffarden, L. E. (Eds.) (2016b). Pintura cuzqueña. MALI.
Maravall, J. A. (1975). La cultura del barroco. Análisis de una estructura histórica. Editorial Ariel.
Mesa, J. De, & Gisbert, T. (1982). Historia de la pintura cuzqueña. T. I. Fundación antiguo N. Wiese, Banco N. Wiese LIDO.
Murúa, M. de. (2001). Historia general del Perú. Dastin.
Novoselova, E. V. (2014). Proiskhozhdenie inkov skvoz’ prizmu mifologicheskoy traditsii [The origin of the Incas through the prism of mythological tradition]. In S. Yu. Saprygin (Ed.), Vostok, Evropa, Amerika v drevnosti [The East, Europe, and America in antiquity]. Vol. 3 (131–145). Moscow State University.
Okada, H. (2017). “Lo indígena” en el arte colonial: ¿expresión inconsciente o imagen manipulada? Mestizajes en diálogo. VII encuentro internacional sobre barroco (pp. 29–36). Fundación Visión Cultural.
Osorio Tejeda, N. (2008). Consideraciones preliminares para el estudio del siglo XVIII en el Mundo Andino. Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana, 67, 9–27.
Pizarro Gómez, F. J. (2003). Identidad y mestizaje en el arte barroco andino. La iconografía. Barroco. Actas do II Congresso Internacional (pp. 197–213). Universidade do Porto.
Sarfson, S., & Madrid, R. (2013). Viejos dioses para un Nuevo Mundo: los símbolos en la pintura Cuzqueña de los siglos XVII y XVIII. In El recurso a lo simbólico. Reflexiones sobre el gusto (pp. 255–264). La Institución Fernando el Católico, Diputación de Zaragoza.
Seldes, A, Burucúa, J. E., Siracusano, G., Maier, M. S., & Abad, G. E. (2002). Green, Yellow, and Red Pigments in South American Painting, 1610-1780. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation. Vol. 41(3), 225–242.
Servat, A., Miró-Quesada, C., & Cáceres, R. (2017). Pintura virreinal en los Andes. Colección Celso Pastor de la Torre. ICPNA.
Sheleshneva, N. A. (1975). Zhivopis’ Peru [Painting of Peru]. In Kul’tura Peru [Culture of Peru] (pp. 273–305). Nauka.
Shemyakin, Ya. G. (2008). Latinoamerikanskaya kul’tura i religioznyy sinkretizm [Latin American culture and religious syncretism]. Kul’turologiya, 1, 181–185.
Spedding, P. A. (2008). Religión en Los Andes: extirpación de idolatrías y modernidad de la fe andina. Instituto Superior Ecuménico Andina de Teología.
Stastny Mosberg, F. (2013). Estudios del arte colonial. V. I. MALI.
Tananaeva, L. I. (2013). O man’erizme i barokko. Ocherki iskusstva Tsentral’no-Vostochnoy Evropy i Latinskoy Ameriki kontsa XVI — XVII vv. [On mannerism and Baroque. Essays on the art of Central-Eastern Europe and Latin America in the late 16th and 17th centuries]. Progress-Traditsiya.
Valenzuela, F. A. (2015). Pintura colonial andina. Estructura simbólica y sincretismo. Atenea 512, II Sem., 153–169.
Valera, B. (1956). Costumbres antiguas del Perú. Secretaria de educación pública.
Vedyushkin, V. A., & Popova, G. A. (Eds.) (2012). Istoriya Ispanii [History of Spain]. Vol. I. Indrik.
( 500.16 kB ) 
( 495.29 kB )
Issue: 1, 2021
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 124 — 141
Downloads: 863