THE IMAGE OF SCIENCE IN THE VIEWS OF YOUNG SCIENTISTS: SOCIAL AND CULTURAL DIMENSIONS
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2020-4-194-213
The article is devoted to the main features of young scientists' views about science in the conditions of transformation of the social and cultural environment of modern cities. In the context of implementing "smart cities" projects, it is vital to consider not only the issues of their technological equipment but, first of all, the formation of a distinctive social and cultural scientific environment. The author notes that semiotic effects of both self-presentation of science in one's environment and presentation and representation of this sphere in society have a significant impact on the formation of images of science perception. Especially among young scientists who, due to their age, remain representatives of a particular group of society, but also begin to identify themselves consciously as members of the professional scientific community. It is up to young scientists to build a "visual anthropology" and shape the future space of modern cities. It is noted that the most important role in the formation of public ideas about science is played by the channels of popularization and scientific communication, the development of which in recent years allows us to talk about the communication space in which young scientists form their ideas. The article presents the results of a sociological study conducted in 2019 among the scientific youth of the Central and Siberian districts, designed to identify how the youngest cohort of scientific youth (from 18 to 35 years old) “sees” science, how it perceives its role in its living space, how the image of science in Russia is characterized for them, whether its image is attractive or not. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is a political-psychological approach included formalized interviews and the method of unfinished sentences. The interview materials were subjected to quantitative processing and qualitative analysis. In accordance with the political-psychological approach, the content of young scientists' ideas about science was examined, their cognitive complexity and emotional sign were determined. The study showed the importance of significant judgments and stereotypes, as well as motivational attitudes and professional requests of this group in the context of individual large branches of scientific knowledge. It is concluded that the formation of the living space of a «smart» city is impossible without the development of human capital, serious work with young scientists (including socio-humanities) who will participate in the formation of a full-fledged urban infrastructure of knowledge in a meaningful way, and develop the sociocultural role of science as a certain type of specific activity in the formation of the living environment of cities.
Keywords: «Smart» city, science, young scientists, sociocultural, political-psychological approach
References:
Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2017). Nauchnyy diskurs: vydvizhenie rezul’tata kak kommunikativnaya i yazykovaya problema [Academic Discourse: Result Advancement as a Communicative and Linguistic Issue]. Lenand. (In Russian).
Cohen, B. (2018, September 10). The 3 Generations of Smart Cities Inside the Development of the Technology Driven City. Fast Company. The future of business. www.fastcompany.com/3047795/the-3-generations-of-smart-cities
Gvozdeva, E. S., & Vysotskiy, E. M. (2019, September 19). Segodnyashniy den’ budushchego rossiyskoy nauki [Present Day in the Future of Russian Science]. http://www.ict.nsc.ru/win/snm/soc2.html (In Russian).
Indicator. (2017, February 7). Bol’shie ozhidaniya: chego molodye uchenye zhdut ot svoey budushchey kar’ery [Great Expectations: What Do Young Scientists Expect from Their Future Careers?]. https://indicator.ru/engineering-science/bolshie-nadezhdy.htm (In Russian).
Khlyustova, Ya. (2018, December 04). Chto molodye uchenye znayut i dumayut o Strategii nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya Rossii, 2018 [What young scientists know and think about the Russian Science and Technology Development Strategy, 2018]. http://www.sib-science.info/ru/news/ne-izmenitsya-03122018 (In Russian).
Kislitsyn, S. A., & Nektarevskaya, Yu. B. (2010). Topical problems of cooperation of scientific elite and political power (On the materials of history science of Russia and the USA. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski SKAGS – State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes, 4, 102–117. (In Russian).
Mitchell, W. J. (2003). Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. MIT Press.
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People and Institutions. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
Sagan, C. (1997). The Demon-Haunted World. Science as a Candle in the Dark. Headline Book Publishing.
Selezneva, A. V. (2011). Methodology of studying political representation and values. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12: Politicheskie nauki – Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science, 2, 42–53. (In Russian).
Townsend, A. (2013). Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. W. W. Norton & Company.
Vidyasova, L. A. (2017). Conceptualization of the “smart city” concept: Socio-technical approach. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 5(11), 52–57. (In Russian).
Volodarskaya, E. A. (2009). Dinamika imidzha nauki v protsesse razvitiya issledovatel’skikh umeniy studentov [The dynamics of the image of science in the development of research skills of students]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, 30(1), 14–31. (In Russian).
Yurevich, A. V., & Tsapenko, I. P. (2010). Nauka v sovremennom rossiyskom obshchestve [Science in Contemporary Russian Society]. Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).
( 527.16 kB ) 
( 366.84 kB )
Issue: 4, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 194 — 213
Downloads: 829