“TALKING HEADS”: MODES OF NARRATIVENESS OF THE ROYAL HELLENISTIC COIN PORTRAITURE
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2020-2-251-266
The present paper focuses on analysis of narrative of the Hellenistic royal portraits depicted on coins. Unlike most of the portraits in sculpture, mosaics and frescoes, coin portrait has traditionally received only an additional scholarly attention. Coin portraits were usually integrated into research as an optional means to identify portraits of other visual genres. However, the representation and replication of coin portrait with individual traits in the Early Hellenistic period shows the shift from the collective (polis) mind to the individual (monarchy). For Hellenistic kingdoms, the royal coin portrait was not only a key tool of the political propaganda, but also a visual representation of the kingship. For the study of royal coin portrait, the analysis of aesthetics and physiognomic theories of Aristotle and Peripatetics is of a great importance. The Aristotelian heritage highly influenced the Hellenistic art and was of a great importance for all artists. The body as a single sign system becomes an important means of visual narrative exploited by the power for creating positive image of the king and kingship. The ‘Physiognomy’, attributed to unknown follower of Aristotle, reveals some striking parallels with artistic devices, widely used by Hellenistic artists - ‘melting’ eye of Alexander, curly hairstyle of kings, anastole. One of the key motifs of ‘Physiognomy’ was a so-called ‘lion’ style, which indicated virtue and generosity. Some traits of this ‘lion’ style could be found in the Alexander’s portraits and then in the coin portraits of many Hellenistic kings, who to some extend imitated the image of Alexander. The royal coin portrait was made under a strict iconographic canon, where the decorum was important. Thus, it is well known some variations of royal coin portrait – in a diadem, in a helmet, in a kausia, in lion and elephant skin and in a radiate crown. Each of this headwear has its own symbolism. An important aspect of the study is a correlation between legend and image. For the Eastern Hellenistic coinage the process of artistic degradation of coin portrait and simultaneous process of growth of the legend occurs. This process shows a shift of visual and textual priorities from implicit nature of visual narrative to explicit one. Another component of the artistic narrative is a presentation of a ruler as a goddess. This tendency represents a ruler cult, which was widely developed in Hellenism. The visualized image of deified king was widely depicted on coins.
Keywords: Hellenism, narrative, portrait, numismatics, Seleukids, Alexander the Great
References:
Brown, B.R. (1995) Royal Portraits in Sculpture and Coins: Pyrrhos and the Successors of Alexander the Great. New York.
Dorofeev, Savchuk, Svetlov 2017 – Dorofeev, L.Yu., Savchuk, V.V. & Svetlov, R.V. (2017) Iconography of Ancient Philosophers: History and Anthropology of Images. Saint Petersburg. (In Russian).
Fleischer, R. (1990) Physiognomie, Ideologie, dynastische Politik. Porträts seleukidischer Könige. In: Akten des XIII. Internationalen Kongress für klassische Archäologie. Berlin 1988 Mainz. P. 33–36.
Fleischer, R. (1996) Hellenistic Royal Iconography on Coins. In: Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship. Ed. by P. Bilde. Aarchus. P. 28-40.
Hafner, G. (1984) Prominente der Antike. 337 Portaits in Wort und Bild. Transl. into Russian by V.A. Seferyants. Moscow.
Ilyushechkin, V.N. (1998) Ancient Physiognomy. In: Man and Society in Classical World. Moscow. P. 441-465. (In Russian).
Losev, A. F. (1975) History of Ancient Aesthetics. Vol. IV. Moscow. (In Russian).
Lotman 2005 – Lotman, Yu.M. (2005) Portait. In: Lotman Yu.M. On Fine Arts. Saint Petersburg. P. 500-518. (In Russian).
Nakhov, I.M. (1987) Physiognomy as a Reflection of a Way of Typology in Classical Literature. In: Living Heritage of Antiquity. Problems of Classical Philology. Vol. IX. Moscow. P. 69-89. (In Russian)
Plantzos, D. (1999) Alexander’s Gaze: Peripatetic Concepts of Vision and their Influence on Hellenistic Royal Portraiture. Archaiognosia. Vol. 10 Athens. P. 65-86.
Sheedy, K. (2007) Magically back to life: Some Thoughts on Ancient Coins and the Study of Hellenistic Royal Portraits. In: Sheedy K. Alexander and the Hellenistic Kingdoms. The Westmoreland Collection. Ancient Coins in Australian Collections. Vol. 1. Sydney. P. 11-16.
Smith R.R.R. (1987) Hellenistic Royal Portraits. Oxford.
Trofimova, A.A. (2012) Imitation Alexamdri. Portraits of Alexander the Great and Mythological Images in Hellenistic Art. Saint Petersburg. (In Russian).
Trofimova, A.A. (2017) Did Portraiture Exist as a Genre in Classical Antiquity? About One of the Problems in Art Theory. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art. Vol. 7. Saint Petersburg. (In Russian).
Vipper 1970 – Vipper, B.R. (1970) The Problem of Similarity in the Art of Portraiture. In: Vipper B.R. Works on Fine Arts. Moscow. P. 342-351. (In Russian).
Zlydneva, N.V. (2013) Visual Narrative: an Attempt of Mythopoetic Reading. Moscow. (In Russian).
( 1.17 MB ) 
( 1.14 MB )
Issue: 2, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 251 — 266
Downloads: 824