IMAGE OF FROG IN FOLKLORE AND RITES OF KHAKAS PEOPLE (END OF 19TH – MIDDLE OF 20TH CENTURIES)
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2020-1-243-265
The aim of the work is to characterize the image of the frog (pāa) in the oral folk art of the Khakas. Based on the goal, the following tasks were set: to analyze the folklore and ethnographic information and to identify the key constituent elements of this mythological being, to discover the semantic links of its image with natural objects and elements. The chronological framework of the work covers the end of the 19th – middle of the 20th centuries. The choice of such time limits is determined by the state of the source base for the research topic. The work is based on an integrated, system-historical approach to the study of the past. The research methodology is based on historical and ethnographic methods – a scientific description, a concrete historical, semantic and relic analysis. As a result of the analysis, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1) the frog was given an important place in the culture of the Khakas. This reality was due both to the prevalence of this animal in the nature of Khakassia, and specifically because of its zoological specificity; 2) in the mythological perception, the specified amphibian was endowed with contradictory dual characteristics and caused mixed feelings in people, often negative ones. In the traditional consciousness of the people, the frog’s unpresentable appearance contained the repulsive intrinsic qualities of its character, which was reflected in folklore and verbal magic; 3) in the ideas of the people, the designated amphibian, as a creature that lives in two elements – water and land, was consistently associated with the Lower World. Moreover, its image is often introduced into mythological and fairy-tale schemes with the participation of other chthonic animals, for example, mice, snakes and lizards. In the Khakas oral folk art, the entire life support system of the demonic characters of the underworld, which included housekeeping and food, was directly connected with this amphibian; 4) animalistic images presented in folklore can be considered not only as purely symbolic, but also as totemic representations; 5) great importance was attached to the image of the frog in the shamanic practice. The animal in question had a direct relationship with both the spirit master of the water – sug eezi, and the lord of the underworld – Erlik Khan. The identified specificity of the frog contributed to its inclusion in the composition of key shaman helpers who mediated between the world of underground spirits and people: 6) among shamanists worship of amphibians reached such a high level that a cult of the patron of sheep appeared, whose external data included amphibian and reptile features. This character carried out protective, protective and healing functions in relation to not only domestic animals, but also to people.
Keywords: mythical image, myth, folklore, Khakas, frog, rites, shamanism.
References:
Achitaeva et al. (2016) Ineffable prose of the Khakass. Comp., Ed. L.K. Achitaeva et al. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).
Adrianov, A. V. (1904) Essays of the Minusinsk Territory. (In Russian).
Ah Khan (2007) Ah, it's time attyg alip Ah Khan. Ah Khan on a white bulan horse: A heroic legend recorded by S. I. Shulbaev. Abakan. (In Khakass).
Albynchi. (1951) Albynchi (alyptınymakh). Alyptykynymtar. Abakan. pp. 13–98. (In Khakass).
Altyn Chӱs. (1958) Altyn Chӱs. Aliptyk nyms. Abakan. (In Khakass).
AMAE TSU. (1975) Archive of the Museum of Archeology and Ethnography of Tomsk State University. No. 681–3: Ethnographic expedition of TSU to Khakassia. (In Russian).
Ay Huugyn. (1958) Ay Huugyn. Altyn Aryғ. Alyptyғ nymykhtar. Abakan. pp. 318–420. (In Khakass).
Butanaev, V. Ya. & Butanaeva, I.I. (2008) The world of Hong Kong (Khakass) folklore. Abakan. (In Russian).
Butanaev, V.Ya. (2006) Hongorai traditional shamanism. Abakan. (In Russian).
Dyrenkova, N.P. (1940) Shor folklore. Moscow, Leningrad. (In Russian).
Dyrenkova, N.P. (1949) Materials on Shamanism at Teleuts. Collection of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography. Volume. 10. Moscow. pp. 107–190. (In Russian).
Dyrenkova, N.P. (2012) Türks of Sayano-Altai. Articles and ethnographic materials. St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
Fasmer, M. (1986) Etymological dictionary of the Russian language. Volume 2. Moscow. (In Russian).
Galay, K.N. & Zhuchkova, A.V. (2014) On the typological classification and symbolic meaning of anthropomorphic images of a prince frog and a princess frog. World of the Russian Word. 4. pp. 50–55. (In Russian).
Ivanov, S.V. (1955)To the question of the significance of images on ancient objects of worship among the peoples of the Sayan-Altai Highlands. Collection of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography. Volume 16. Moscow, Leningrad. pp. 165–264. (In Russian).
Karatanov, I.D. (1884) Features of the external life of the Kachin Tatars. News of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society. Volume 20. Vol. 6. pp. 618–645. (In Russian).
Katanov, N.F. (1897) Report on a trip made from May 15 to September 1, 1896 to the Minusinsky district of the Yenisei province. Kazan. (In Russian).
Katanov, N.F. (1907) Adverbs of Uryankhayts (Soyots), Abakan Tatars and Karagas. Samples of folk literature of Turkic tribes published by V.V. Radlov. Vol. 9. St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
Klementz, D.A. (1890) Several samples of tambourines of the Minusinsk foreigners. Notes of the East Siberian Department of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society. Volume 2. Vol. 2.pp. 25–35. (In Russian).
Kurbizhekova, A.V. (2011) Siben Aryg (heroic legend). Abakan. (In Khakass).
Kӱmӱs (1958) Kӱmӱs hanattiғ kitchen time attiғ Kӱn Töңis. Altyn Aryғ. Aliptyk nyms. Abakan. pp. 223-317. (In Khakass).
Mainogasheva, V.E. (1997) Khakass heroic epic: Ai-Huuchin. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).
Miller, G.F. (2009) Description of the Siberian peoples. Translation from German by A. Kh. Elert. Moscow. (In Russian).
NARCH (1958) National Archives of the Republic of Khakassia. F. 588. Op. 1. D. 114. Materials of the Khakass folklore and dialectological expedition of the Abakan Pedagogical Institute. (In Russian).
Patachakov, K. M. (1984) On drawings on the shamanic tambourine of the Khakassians. All-Union session based on the results of field ethnographic and anthropological studies 1982–1983. Moscow.pp. 278–279. (In Russian).
Potapov, L.P. (1981) Shaman tambourine of Kachintsev as a unique subject of ethnographic collections. Material Culture and Mythology. Volume XXXVI. Leningrad. pp. 125–137. (In Russian).
Potapov, L.P. (1991) Altai shamanism. Leningrad. (In Russian).
Preobrazhensky, A. (1910–1914) Etymological dictionary of the Russian language. Volume I. Moscow. (In Russian).
Radlov, V.V. (1868) Kan Mergen Ay Mergenң. Samples of folk literature of Turkic tribes living in southern Siberia and the Dzungar steppe. Part II The sub-territories are Abakan: Sagai, Koibal, Kachin, Kyzyl and Chulym (Kyuerik). St. Petersburg. pp. 532–574. (In Khakass).
Sagoyakov, N.N. (2010) Khakass myths. Abakan. (In Russian).
Subrakova, O.V. (2006) Khakass-Russian dictionary. Novosibirsk (In Russian).
Tokarev, S.A. (1988) Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia. Ed. Tokarev. Volume 2. Moscow. (In Russian).
Troyakov, P.A. (2006) Myths and legends of the Khakass. Ed. P.A. Troyakova. Abakan. (In Russian).
Ungvitskaya, M.A. & Mainogasheva V.E. (1972) Khakass folk poetry. Abakan. (In Russian).
Yakovlev, E.K. (1900) Ethnographic overview of the foreign population of the South Yenisei Valley and the Explanatory Catalog of the Ethnographic Department of the museum. Description of the Minusinsk Museum. Vol. 4. Minusinsk. (In Russian).
( 644.96 kB ) 
( 620.6 kB )
Issue: 1, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 243 — 265
Downloads: 1182