ICON IN A MUSEUM: VISUAL ORDER OF EXHIBITING AS FORM OF INTERPRETATION
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2020-1-193-207
The article examines the historical trends in icons display throughout the entire period of its existence as a museum object. Museum display of icons which started about a century and a half ago has always reflected relations between museum, society and power as well as changes in understanding of the phenomenon of a museum item as such. Throughout all this time, the status of an icon in a museum space, its interpretation and various ways of display have always been under discussion. The uniqueness of an icon lies in the fact that it gives a vivid opportunity to trace the transformation of meaning of an object when it becomes a museum item, i.e. is transferred from one context to another. The present museum analysis declares that museum is not a neutral storage space for monuments or information. It actively shapes the frames of perception, endows the exhibits with meaning and even grants them the status of the norm and obviousness, actively forming cultural identity. When an object is removed from its initial environment and included in a museum exhibition as a museum item it loses its original meaning, thus acquiring a new, different interpretation. The display policies and museum design have always been the tools with which a museum developed new meanings. As for icons, the opportunity to trace the change of their meaning depending on the ways of display is of interest. For example, how an icon is removed from the sacral context and acquires its secular meaning, how the sacral context is recreated within the secular space of a museum exhibition. Several periods can be distinguished in the history of museum existence of icons. In the 19th-century display the icon detached itself from its sacral space and was regarded as an object for collecting or academic research, thus confirming the value of rational perception. In the early 20th century, museums made first attempts to return to icons their sacral context, but not the ceremonial one, but the philosophic and esthetic. In the 1930s, the exhibitions maximally levelled both the connection of an icon with its native sacral context and its interpretation as a philosophic and esthetic phenomenon. It turned into a historical document, an illustration for educational stories or ideological thesis. By the end of the 20th century, Old Russian Painting items were perceived as masterpieces of art affording an opportunity of aesthetic enjoyment. The current approach synthesizes all previously used ways of display. Nevertheless, placement of icons into their sacral contexts recreated by means of various exhibition methods has become common practice. Thus, all the above mentioned ways of display of icons at different stages of their museum existence show, nevertheless, certain recurrence. Under their impact, an icon is perceived either as a sacral or a profane object. Explanations underlying the exhibition methods of sacralization/desacralization of icons were certainly absolutely different, though they don’t hamper the ability to see typological similarities between common strategies. For all that, only the values forming predominant visual strategies of particular time can influence display practices.
Keywords: museum design, boundary, icon, context, display policies, sacral, secular.
References:
Avanesov, S. S. (2014) CHto mozhno nazyvat' vizual'noj semiotikoj? [What Can Be Called Visual Semiotics?] ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2. pp. 11-25. (In Russian).
Avanesov, S. S. (2019) O vizual'noj teologii [About visual theology.]. Visual theology.1. pp. 13–43. (In Russian).
Balash, A. N. (2013) Veshch' v muzee: razmyshlenie o sud'be «predmeta muzejnogo znacheniya» [The thing in the museum: thinking about the fate of the "subject of museum significance"]. Voprosy muzeologii – Questions of museology.1(7). pp. 19–24. (In Russian).
Bruk, YA. V. (1987) Gosudarstvennaya Tret'yakovskaya galereya. Istoriya i kollekcii [State Tretyakov Gallery. History and collections]. Moscow. (In Russian).
Casey, V. (2003) The Museum Effect: Gazing from Object to Performance in the Contemporary Cultural-history Museum. Cultural Institutions and Digital Technology. Paris. [Online] Available from: http://www.archimuse.com/publishing/ichim03/095C.pdf (Accessed: 25.06.2019).
Harris, J. (2011) «Nasha pechal', nashe hrupkoe muzhestvo»: Muzeefikaciya i novaya muzeologiya [“Our sorrow, our fragile courage”: Museumification and new museology]. Translated from English by L.O. Ogloblina. Voprosy muzeologii – Questions of museology. 1 (3). pp. 31–41.
Karasik, I. N. & Petrova, E. N. (1995) Iz istorii muzeya. Gosudarstvennyj Russkij muzej [From the history of the museum. State Russian Museum]. St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
Marstine, J. (2006) What is New Museum Theory? New Museum Theory and Practice: An Introduction. Oxford. pp. 1–36.
Nikishin, N. A. (1997) Muzejnye sredstva: znaki i simvoly [Museum tools: signs and symbols]. Museum exposition. On the way to the museum of the XXI century. Moscow. pp. 23–32. (In Russian).
Nikonova, A. A. (2006) The riddle of a museum subject. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta – Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. 1. pp. 11–18. (In Russian).
Osokina, E. A. (2018) Heavenly blue angelic clothes: the fate of the works of ancient Russian art. 1920-1930s. Moscow. (In Russian).
Pivovarova, N. V. (2011) Christian antiquities in St. Petersburg: from the history of the collection and museumification of museum antiquities. Voprosy muzeologii – Questions of museology. 1(3). pp. 57–66. (In Russian).
Polikarpova, G. A. (1998) 100 years of the Russian Museum in photographs. 1898-1998. Album. St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
Saltanova M. V. (2010) Game principles in the organization of the museum exposition space. Voprosy muzeologii – Questions of museology. 1. pp. 133–140. (In Russian).
Tarasov, O. Yu. (2007) Frame and image. The rhetoric of framing in Russian art. Moscow. (In Russian).
Volkovich, A. YU. (1999) Muzejnaya ekspoziciya kak semioticheskaya sistema: Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchyonoj stepeni kandidata kul'turologii [Museum exposition as a semiotic system: Abstract of dissertation for the degree of candidate of cultural science]. St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
Vzdornov, G. I. (1986) Istoriya otkrytiya i izucheniya russkoj srednevekovoj zhivopisi. XIX vek [History of the discovery and study of Russian medieval painting. XIX century]. Moscow. (In Russian).
( 666.8 kB ) 
( 660.91 kB )
Issue: 1, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 193 — 207
Downloads: 1204