THE SEMIOTIC CONTEXT OF PEDAGOGICAL EDUCATION
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-4-206-222
Although there exists a considerable number of research works on the semiotic nature of education, they do not provide a comprehensive idea of the semiotic context of pedagogical education. The article considers the issues of hierarchization of sign systems and the part they play in pedagogical students’ development as professional teachers. To characterize the semiotic context of pedagogical education, the author of the article addresses A.B. Solomonik’s pyramid of sign systems. In connection with this classification, he distinguishes two goals of pedagogical education. The first one is connected with the use of sign systems for the determination and application of the content of a school subject pedagogical students learn in order to transfer it to schoolchildren. In this context, the relevance of semiotic research and its development has three aspects: semiotics of school subject content visualization; semiotics of educational process visualization based on the modern capabilities of technical educational aids, information and communication technologies; semiotics of pedagogical communication. The second goal is associated with the application of the semiotic pyramid for systematization and transmission of the general professional culture to student teachers. However, pedagogy as a science does not have formalized sign systems of the first and second orders of the considered classification. In this study, stereotypes (representations, images, forms of behavior) that determine the dynamics of the student teacher’s professional development act as units of sign systems. The development of pedagogical culture stereotypes in students determines their further professional and personal progress. The description of sign systems of four stages is given. (1) Natural sign systems. These are elementary ideas about relationships, characteristic of interaction between the student and the teacher, which reflect life experience obtained by the student prior to their professional education. (2) Image systems. These include stereotypes that characterize pedagogical university applicants’ ideas of the system of lessons and its attributes thus forming the image of the traditionally existing school. Stereotypes may have both positive and negative properties. (3) Language systems. These are verbal texts containing theoretical information about a specific field of professional culture which suggests its individual assimilation by each student (lecture material, traditional educational tasks, etc.). A semiotic teaching model emerges. The professor introduces educational paradigms (metastereotypes of pedagogical ideas and forms of behavior) to the student in theory through language systems. (4) Notation systems. These include written texts (documents) reflecting pedagogical systems and technologies, educational programs and standards. A certain role in the development of stereotypes in student teachers belongs to lists of competencies and labor functions set by educational and professional standards. The article considers student teachers’ personal and professional development approach to pedagogical education which implies a practice-oriented system of education through the continuous solution of profession-oriented educational tasks. In this sense, teachers’ training is to reflect professional activities in terms of the emergence of a synergistic effect.
Keywords: levels of sign systems, pedagogical education, content of education, educational process, general professional culture, stereotype
References:
Avanesov, L.E. & Akopyan, K.A. (2016) Obrazovatel’nye attraktory v sinergizme kak fazovaya privlekatel’nost’ sistemy obrazovaniya [Educational Attractors in Synergism as a Phase Attractiveness of the Education System]. Uchenye zapiski. 15(2). pp. 137–144. DOI: 10.17922/2071-5323-2016-15-2-137-144
Chaplygina, Yu.S. (2010) Pedagogical Stereotypes as Form of Collective Consciousness in Teaching Process. Izvestiya Samarskogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk – Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 12:3(3). pp. 678–682. (In Russian).
Chervonnyy, M.A. (2018) Visualization in Teaching Mathematics and Physics for Schoolchildren and in Training Future Teachers. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 4. pp. 235–250. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2018-4-235-250
Chervonnyy, M.A., Gazizov, T.T. & Borisova, E.E. (2017) Organizatsiya pedagogicheskoy praktiki studentov na baze tsentra dopolnitel’nogo obrazovaniya [Organizing Teaching Practice of Students at the Center of Continuing Education]. Pedagogika. 9. pp. 103–107.
Dalinger, V.A. (2011) Obuchenie matematike na osnove kognitivno-vizual’nogo podkhoda [Teaching Mathematics Based on the Cognitive-Visual Approach]. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosuniversiteta. 1. pp. 297–303.
Finchenko, S.N. & Sartakova, E.E. (2017) Etapy stanovleniya sovremennykh predstavleniy o ponyatii stereotipa v professional’noy pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti [Formation Stages of Modern Ideas About the Concept of Stereotype in Professional Pedagogical Activity]. Psikhologiya, sotsiologiya i pedagogika – Psychology, Sociology and Pedagogy. 12. [Online] Available from: http://psychology.snauka.ru/2017/12/8438 (Accessed: 07.02.2019).
Galaktionova, T.G. (2013) Pedagogika teksta: opyt semioticheskogo resheniya [Pedagogy of the Text: An Experience of a Semiotic Solution]. St. Petersburg: [s.n.].
Isaykin, O.A. & Shabashev, A.V. (2005) Ot melovoy do interaktivnoy [From Chalk to Interactive]. Obrazovanie i nauka. 4 (34). pp. 128–130.
Kharlanova, E.M. (2014) Kontseptsiya razvitiya sotsial’noy aktivnosti studentov v protsesse integratsii formal’nogo i neformal’nogo obrazovaniya [The Concept of the Development of Students’ Social Activity in the Integration of Formal and Non-Formal Education]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University.
Kharlanova, E.M. (2015) Razvitie sotsial’noy aktivnosti studentov vuza v protsesse integratsii formal’nogo i neformal’nogo obrazovaniya [The Development of University Students’ Social Activity in the Integration of Formal and Non-Formal Education]. Pedagogy Dr. Diss. Chelyabinsk.
Kon, I.S. (1966) Psikhologiya predrassudka (o sotsial’no-psikhologicheskikh kornyakh etnicheskikh predubezhdeniy) [The Psychology of Bias (On the Socio-Psychological Roots of Ethnic Bias)]. Novyy mir. 9. pp. 187–205.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (2004) Semiotics of Education or “Keys” and “Lock Picks” to the Modelling of Educational Systems. Idei i idealy – Ideas and Ideals. 1:4(22). pp. 14–27. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2014-4.1-14-27
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (2007) Printsipy modelirovaniya urovney obrazovaniya [Principles of Modeling Educational Levels]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia. 8. pp. 105–109.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (2008) Modelirovanie obrazovatel’nykh sistem: issledovatel’skaya programma [Educational Systems Modeling: A Research Program]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia. 9. pp. 89–94.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (2009) Kriterii opredeleniya granits v obrazovatel’nom prostranstve [Criteria for Determining Boundaries in the Educational Space]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia. 10. pp. 81–91.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (2013) Semiotic Diagnostics: Method of Measuring the Selfishness of Power. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University. 9(137). pp. 255–261. (In Russian).
Ostashkov, V.N., Smirnov, E.I. & Belonogova, E.A. (2016) Education Sinergy in Research of Attractors and Basins of Nonlinear Mapping Attraction. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik – Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 6. pp. 146–156. (In Russian).
Petrov, Yu.A. & Stolyar, A.A. (1977) O pedagogicheskom aspekte semioticheskogo analiza voprosov [On the Pedagogical Aspect of the Semiotic Analysis of Issues]. In: Biryukov, B.V. & Farber, V.G. (eds) Logika i problemy obucheniya [Logic and Problems of Training]. Moscow: Pedagogika. pp. 63–87.
Sergeev, I.S. (2004) Osnovy pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti [Fundamentals of Pedagogical Activity]. St. Petersburg: Piter.
Shenshev, L.V. (1977) Opyt semioticheskogo podkhoda k probleme vzaimosvyazey mezhdu uchebnymi predmetami [An Experience of a Semiotic Approach to the Problem of the Interconnections Between Academic Subjects]. In: Biryukov, B.V. & Farber, V.G. (eds) Logika i problemy obucheniya [Logic and Problems of Training]. Moscow: Pedagogika. pp. 185–214.
Shirshov, V.D. (2007) Vvedenie v pedagogicheskuyu semiotiku [Introduction to Pedagogical Semiotics]. [Online] Available from: https://portalus.ru/modules/shkola/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1192625861&archive=1196815384&start_from=&ucat=& (Accessed: 01.07.2019).
Solomonik, A.B. (2009) Ocherk obshchey semiotiki [Essay on General Semiotics]. Minsk: MET.
Solomonik, A.B. (2010) Semiotics and Its Pedagogical Continuations. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya – Problems of Modern Education. 2. pp. 41–48. (In Russian).
Sorokin, P.A. (1992) Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society]. Moscow: Politizdat.
Sorokin, Yu.A. (1998) Stereotip, shtamp, klishe: K probleme opredeleniya ponyatiy [Stereotype, Stamp, Cliché: Towards the Problem of Definition of Concepts]. In: Obshchenie: Teoreticheskie i pragmaticheskie problemy [Communication: Theoretical and Pragmatic Problems]. Moscow: Institut Fonda “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”.
Toisteva, O.S. (2015) Sistemno-deyatel’nostnyy podkhod v professional’noy podgotovke sotsial’no-pedagogicheskikh kadrov v vuze [A System-Activity Approach in the Professional Training of Social and Pedagogical Personnel in a University]. Pedagogy Cand. Diss. Yekaterinburg.
Verbitskiy, A.A. (2015) Aktivnoe obuchenie v vysshey shkole: kontekstnyy podkhod [Active Learning in Higher Education: A Contextual Approach]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.
Verbitskiy, A.A. & Il’yazova, M.D. (2011) Invarianty professionalizma: problemy formirovaniya [Invariants of Professionalism: Problems of Formation]. Moscow: Logos.
Yadov, V.A. (2013) Samoregulyatsiya i prognozirovanie sotsial’nogo povedeniya lichnosti: Dispozitsionnaya kontseptsiya [Self-Regulation and Forecasting of the Personality’s Social Behavior: A Dispositional Concept]. Moscow: TsSPiM.
( 369.06 kB ) 
( 347.64 kB )
Issue: 4, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 206 — 222
Downloads: 919