VISUAL SEMIOTICS OF THE ARMENIAN REVOLUTION: THINGS AND SYMBOLS
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2019-3-156-181
The purpose of the article is to reveal the formation of symbolic meanings/ signs/codes in the visual representations of political transformations on the material of the Velvet revolution visual images in Armenia in 2018. Revolution, like any change in the socio-political paradigm inevitably leads to a metonymy, a substitution of the old, hackneyed images, sociocodes for a new ones. The revolution of 2018 in Armenia, if not by novelty, then by the number of newly formed signs/codes, is highly comparable with the classical revolutions of the past. During the revolution, the leaders and ordinary members have shown amazing creativity in the design and memoization of new visual images playing up the hidden symbolic signs, beards, clothes, accessories, etc. The revolution is carried out by extraordinary individuals who are able, among other things, to rise above everyday clichés and stereotypes. Therefore, in an era of revolutionary change, the role of nonverbal social impact is increasing dramatically. Not possessing the power of the State’s propaganda machines, resources and power, revolutionaries are forced to use a variety of techniques, showing flexibility, resourcefulness and revolutionary pressure. However, the role of nonverbal social interaction becomes crucial in conditions of rapidly changing realities of postmodern network society. The driving force behind any revolution is the youth, with whom it is necessary to speak in its language, avoiding instructive tone and tiring narrative with streamlined formulations and lack of meaning. Much more effective and intelligible clear and scathing slogans in the spirit of assertive and expressive “ROST Windows”. In Armenia, the slogan was: “take a step...” – a slogan of multiple use, “charged”, each time depending on the changing political situation, like a gun, new goals and objectives. The material world of the revolution turned out to be just as “speaking” and convincing. During the revolutionary events of 2018, ideologies acquired physicality, which made them look very convincing, at least more convincing than the speculative moral teaching categories produced by the Dashnak-Republican’s propaganda machine. Revolution events in Armenia developed with rapid speed, so that sometimes it was impossible to keep track of the kaleidoscope of events and especially to comprehend them. And then the images and signs have joined in the struggle that have an impact on the subcortex, “especially imprinted” in it like the commercials or banners. At the same time, the main principle of building visual images of The Armenian revolution was a short format, always more effective than unreasonably prolonged moralizing resonance. Unconvincing advertising is anti-advertising, unconvincing propaganda is anti-propaganda.
Keywords: Armenian velvet revolution, visual semiotics, visual images, structural hierarchy, semiotics of beard, semiotics of clothes, network community
References:
Bard, Söderqvist 2004 – Bard A., Söderqvist J. Netocracy: The New Power Elite and Life After Capitalism. Transl. into Russian. Saint Petersburg, 2004.
Bonnell 1999 – Bonnell V. E. Iconography of Power: Soviet Political Posters under Lenin and Stalin. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1999.
Castells 1991 – Castells M. The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and Urban-Regional Processes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
Eisenstadt 1999 – Eisenstadt S. N. Revolution and the Transformation of Societies. A Comparative Study of Civilizations. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 1999.
Garfunkel 2004 – Garfinkel S. Everything under control: Who and how is watching you. Transl. into Russian. Ekaterinburg, 2004.
Gritsanov, Mozheiko 2001 – Postmodernism: Encyclopedia. Ed. by A. A. Gritsanov, M. A. Mozheiko. Moscow, 2001. In Russian.
Davtyan 2011 – Davtyan N. A., Davtyan M. A. Conceptual imageology: Art, science, profanity. Methodological foundation. Moscow, 2012. In Russian.
Deleuze, Guattari 2005 – Deleuze G., Guattari F. Traité de nomadologie. Transl. into Russian. New circle. 2005. № 2 (92). P. 183–187.
Hakim Bey 1991 – Hakim Bey. T. A. Z. The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism. New York, 1991. URL: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/hakim-bey-t-a-z-the-temporary-autonomous-zone-ontological-anarchy-poetic-terrorism.
Kolonitsky 2001 – Kolonitsky B. I. Symbols of power and the struggle for power: to the study of the political culture of the Russian revolution of 1917. Saint Petersburg, 2001. In Russian.
Margaryan 2016 – Margaryan E. The objective world in myth and epos: food of the heroes, hair, beard, and salt. Critique and Semiotics. 2016. 1. P. 144–165. In Russian.
Margaryan 2018 – Margaryan E. Why did the revolution happen? Yerevan, 2018. In Russian.
Mitchell 2012 – Mitchell W. Me++. The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 2012.
Shchepanskaya 2003 – Shchepanskaya T. B. Traditions of urban subcultures. Modern urban folklore. Moscow, 2003. P. 27–33. In Russian.
Stemp 2012 – Stemp R. Le langage secret de la Renaissance: le symbolisme caché de l’art italien. Gennevilliers, 2012.
Ulibina 2012 – Ulibina E. V. Immutability as a characteristic of football fans’ identity. Psychological Studies. 2012. Vol. 5. 23. In Russian.
Vеblеn 1984 – Vеblеn Т. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 1984.
Virilio 2004 – Virilio P. La machine de vision. Transl. into Russian. Saint Petersburg, 2004.
( 2.29 MB ) 
( 2.27 MB )
Issue: 3, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 156 — 181
Downloads: 940