VISUALIZATION IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS FOR SCHOOLCHILDREN AND IN TRAINING FUTURE TEACHERS
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2018-4-235-250
The paper discusses the role and functions of visual thinking within the context of modern education in physics and mathematics. Visual thinking is an intrinsic part of the thinking process of the work of specialists in the fields of exact and natural sciences. In connection with this, with the increase of environment visualization in the learning, professional and personal human activities, and with the growth of information flows and their impact on people, the modern role and possibilities of semiotic resources of mathematics and physics become of considerable relevance. The paper delineates the prospects of visual modeling with the help of mathematical and physical models, and of mental experiment in developing images, reflecting on them and subsequent operating them. On the basis of the analysis of Russian and foreign literature and arguments developed by the author, the paper substantiates the necessity of the development and extension of the theory of the semiotic component of education and its implementation. Semiotics expands the meaning of both theoretical and practical parts of mathematical and natural science education. The paper focuses on the analysis of the development of new approaches to the implementation of the semiotic component of modern education in teaching schoolchildren and in training teachers of mathematical and physical specializations. In teaching schoolchildren, the component is to be implemented by means of their inclusion into educational practices based on real situations appearing in professional activity of specialists working directly in the fields of mathematics, physics and in the spheres of their application. The approach to teachers’ training is based on visualizing their future professional activities in practical resolving problems within selected training situations. In connection with this, the author identified and substantiated the priority directions of the development of the semiotic component in physical and mathematical education. Dwelling on the concepts of visual thinking and on the provided grounding of the necessity of visual modeling in teaching schoolchildren and the relevant teachers’ training, the author identified and considered two basic processes in becoming a teacher (which are also the teacher’s professional activity functions): interiorization and modeling. The paper presents a variant of systematization of the semiotic component of the future physics and mathematics teachers’ competencies in their professional activities. The development of this semiotic component concerns such elements of competencies as knowledge, skills, values and attitudes, prevailing ways of performance. Mastering the competence of educational-professional information visualization by future teachers is to facilitate the increase of the quality of their training, to ensure their ability to perform educational activities in actualized regional practices, including innovative ones, and to design effective learning activities of their students in the visual space.
Keywords: visual thinking, semiotic resources, semiotic component of the teacher’s competency, teaching physics and mathematics, modeling, mental experiment
References:
Avanesov, S.S. (2014) What can be called visual semiotics? PRAXĒMA. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 1. pp. 10–22. (In Russian).
Akulenko, I.A. (2013) Semiotics component of methodical competence future mathematics teacher. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – The Bryansk State University Herald. 1(2). pp. 74–76. (In Russian).
Arnheim, R. (1981) Vizual’noe myshlenie [Visual Thinking]. In: Gippenreyter, Yu.B. & Petukhov, V.V. (eds) Khrestomatiya po obshchey psikhologii [A Reader in General Psychology]. Moscow: Moscow State University. pp. 97–107.
Akhutina, T.V. (2004) L. S. Vygotskiy: kul’turno-istoricheskiy i estestvenno-nauchnyy podkhody k interiorizatsii [L.S. Vygotsky: Cultural-Historical and Natural-Scientific Approaches to Interiorization]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya – The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology. 3. pp. 41–56.
Blake, S., Pape, S., Tchoshanov, M.A. (2004) Ispol’zovanie dostizheniy neyropsikhologii v pedagogike SSHA [The use of the achievements of neuropsychology in US Pedagogy]. Pedagogika. 5. pp. 85–90.
Verbitskiy, A.A. (1991) Aktivnoe obuchenie v vysshey shkole: kontekstnyy podkhod [Active higher education: a contextual approach]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.
Vygotskiy, L.S. (1982) Sobranie sochineniy: v 6 t. [Collected Works: in 6 vols]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Pedagogika.
Golovin, S.Yu. (1998) Slovar’ prakticheskogo psikhologa [Dictionary of Practical Psychologist]. Minsk: Kharvest.
Dalinger, V.A. (2011) Teaching mathematics on the basis of cognitive visual approach. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – The Bryansk State University Herald. 1. pp. 297–303. (In Russian).
Ermakov, S.V., Popov, A.A., Averkov, M.S. et al. (2017) Razvitie matematicheskogo myshleniya v praktikakh otkrytogo obrazovaniya [The development of mathematical thinking in open education practices]. Moscow: Lenand.
Efimov, V.S., Lapteva, A.V., Ermakov, S.V. et al. (1994) Vozmozhnye miry ili sozdanie praktiki tvorcheskogo myshleniya: posobie dlya prepodavateley [Possible worlds or the creation of the practice of creative thinking: a manual for teachers]. Moscow: Interpraks.
Komarov, B.A. (2014) Structural components of the semiotical method in teaching model building in the process of science education. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern Problems of Science and Education. 5. [Online] Available from: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=14697 (Accessed: 20th June 2018). (In Russian).
Kretov, P.V. (2014) Simvolika myslennogo eksperimenta: filosofsko-antropologicheskiy aspect [Symbolism of a Mental Experiment: The Philosophical and Anthropological Aspect]. Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologiy i kiberprostranstva – Philosophical Problems of Information Technology and Cyberspace. 1. pp. 33–51.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (2017) The ignoramus paradox: the time of visual symbolism domination. PRAXĒMA. Problemy vizual’noy semiotiki – ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 4(14). pp. 49–64. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2017-4-49-64
Melik-Gaykazyan, I.V. (2014) Semiotics of education or “keys” and “lock picks” to the modelling of educational systems. Idei i Idealy – Ideas and Ideals. 4(1). pp. 14–27. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2014-4.1-14-27
Oakley, B. (2016) Dumay kak matematik. Kak reshat’ lyubye zadachi bystree i effektivnee [Think as a mathematician. How to solve any problems faster and more efficiently]. Translated from English. Moscow: Albina Publisher.
Roem, D. (2012) Bla-bla-bla. Chto delat’, kogda slova ne rabotayut [Blah-blah-blah: what to do when words don’t work]. Translated from English by P. Mironov. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber.
Samarskiy, A. A. & Mikhaylov, A. P. (2005) Matematicheskoe modelirovanie. Idei, metody, primery [Mathematical modeling. Ideas, methods, examples]. Moscow: Fizmatlit.
Stepin, V.S., Abushenko, V.L. & Goldberg, F.I. (n.d.) Eksperiment myslennyy [The mental experiment]. [Online] Available from: http://gtmarket.ru/concepts/7006 (Accessed: 22nd June 2018).
Tarasenkova, N.A. (2010) Realizatsiya semioticheskogo podkhoda v matematicheskom obrazovani [Realization of the semiotic approach in mathematical education]. Synergetics and Reflection in Mathematics Education. Bachinovo (Bulgaria), September 10–12, 2010. [s.l., s.n.]. pp. 307–313.
Chervonnyy, M.A. (2017a) Supplementary education in physics and mathematics as a condition for the development of gifted children’s abilities. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 425. pp. 198–202. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17223/15617793/425/26
Chervonnyy, M.A. (2017b) Mentoring in the development of the conception of pedagogical support of the future teachers within the processes of higher pedagogical, general and additional education systems integration. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozrenie – Pedagogical Review. 3. pp. 16–23. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2017-3-16-23
Shchetnikov, A.I. (1993) Myslennyy eksperiment i ratsional’naya nauka [Thought experiment and rational science: A Handbook for teachers of physics in secondary school]. Moscow: Aspekt-Press.
Danielsson, K. (2016) Modes and meaning in the classroom – The role of different semiotic resources to convey meaning in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education. 35. pp. 88–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.005
Makarova, E.A. (2016) Visual Culture in Educational Environment and Innovative Teaching Technologies. Universal Journal of Management. 4(11). pp. 621–627. [Online] Available from: http://www.hrpub.org (Accessed: 21st June 2018). DOI: 10.13189/ujm.2016.041104
Makarova, E.A., Makarova, E.L. & Varaks, A.M. (2017) Education process visualization in metacognition development and sustainability. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education. 5(2). pp. 65–74. [Online] Available from: http://www.ijcrsee.com (Accessed: 21st June 2018). DOI: 10.5937/IJCRSEE1702065A
O’Halloran, K.L. (2015) The language of learning mathematics: A multimodal perspective. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 40. pp. 63–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.09.002
Vile, A. (2009) What can semiotics do for mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. 1. pp. 87–102. DOI: 10.1080/14794809909461548
( 332.88 kB ) 
( 322.13 kB )
Issue: 4, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 235 — 250
Downloads: 1281