THE URBAN SPACE OF POWER: THE DIACHRONIC DIMENSION
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2018-3-170-178
The phenomenon of architectural and landscape spaces of power, showing the specificity of the relations between society and power, is considered. Asym metry of influence and other characteristic of power are clearly expressed in the organization of these spaces. Reproducible for thousands of years they are content due to the technology of power. Among the invariant features of the spaces of power: the symmetry of the architectural and compositional solutions (the presence of severe axis), the dominance of the ‘classical’ forms, the ensemble construction, the availability of space for demonstrations and so forth. The existence of specially organized territorial and spatial structures reveals the content, non-obvious connections and dynamics of mutual relations between society and government. Spaces of power are the object of reflection as an “image of power”, acquire a symbolic expression (verbal or visual), bearing a semantic load. The article uses the diachronic method of correlation of architectural methods of expression of power with the characteristic moments of the state of society. Identified sustainable and re-usable architectural decisions, traced the patterns of their development. It is established that the processes of formation and development of spaces of power are characterized by stages of both complexity and simplification of the environment. The nature and forms of their manifestation in the interiors and exteriors of modern objects of power of democratic communities are analyzed. Bringing the russian spaces of power in compliance with the requirements of the time is evaluated as a socially significant problem.
Keywords: city, social spaces, relations of society and power
References:
Barabanov 1999 – Semiotics of space. Ed. by A. A. Barabanov. Ekaterinburg, 1999. In Russian.
Bourdieu 2007 – Bourdieu P. Sociologie de l’espace sociale. Transl. into Russian. St. Petersburg, 2007.
Delitz 2008 – Delitz H. Architecture in social dimension. Transl. into Russian. Sociological researches. 2008. 10. P. 113 – 121.
Fedorov, Kiliaskhanov 2013 – Fedorov V. V., Kiliaskhanov M. Kh. Spaces of social life. Tver, 2013. In Russian.
Fedorov et al. 2015 – Fedorov V. V., Fedorov M. V., Korotaeva Z. V. Predictors of space power: the semantic aspect. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of visual semiotics. 2015. 3 (5). P. 86–96. In Russian.
Kosolapov 2005 a – Kosolapov N. Globalization: spatial aspect. World economy and international relations. 2005. 6. P. 3–13. In Russian.
Kosolapov 2005 b – Kosolapov N. Rossia in the spaces of the globalizing world. World economy and international relations. 2005. 7. P. 3–14. In Russian.
Lynch 1986 – Lynch K. A Theory of Good City Form. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 1986.
( 308.96 kB ) 
( 302.5 kB )
Issue: 3, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 170 — 178
Downloads: 895