THE IMAGE-PARADIGM OF JERUSALEM IN CHRISTIAN HIEROTOPY
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2018-3-101-113
Image-paradigms are non-pictorial mental images of the sacred. They are engendered in the viewer’s imagination by means of organized ensembles of iconic, symbolic and typological elements of sacred spaces and emerge from a manifold of interrelating associations. In this paper I elucidate this complex notion by studying the example of one image-paradigm of fundamental importance, namely, the Holy City of Jerusalem, which appears to the religious imagination as the synthesis of an idealized historical city-relic and its celestial counterpart – the Heavenly Jerusalem. This Jerusalem is both the ‘navel’ of the world and a place of God’s immediate, living presence. The Church as a whole, as well as individual churches, are identified with Jerusalem, which reflects their primary function of serving as meeting places with God. While participating in the liturgy and integrating into the liturgical space, the faithful feel themselves to be in the midst of the Heavenly Jerusalem, a feeling which clearly cannot be reduced to or evoked by a simple two-dimensional picture. Generally, pictures are unable fully to represent a sense of being somewhere. They help to create ambiences, but they cannot represent them. It takes more than a pictorial representation to transport oneself, in the mind’s eye, to another place. This is what is involved in the concept of the image-paradigm. The image-paradigm works by means of a ‘spatial icon’, that is, a thoughtfully arranged spatial system of pointers, including architecture, an iconographic program, as well as the entire liturgical performance, including the very presence of the congregation absorbed in pious contemplation. An image-paradigm belongs to the religious tradition as a whole and takes shape in individual minds through a wide variety of religious experiences, including training, reading, prayer, liturgical life, mysticism, etc. An image-paradigm can be evoked in sacred spaces only because it is known beforehand to all the actors involved, both to those arranging them as well as viewers. In this paper, I begin with a brief review of iconographic strategies employed in conjuring the image-paradigm of the Holy City in Christian churches. In particular, the Celestial City can be represented in icons by means of earthly architecture including either recognizable motives of Constantinian Jerusalem or idealized and even fantastic patterns. Next, I move on to New Jerusalems, that is, Medieval re-constructions of the Christian Jerusalem, which were used as sites of virtual pilgrimage. Finally, I discuss possible links between Russian onion domes and the cupola of most prominent Jerusalem churches: the Holy Sepulcher and the Dome of the Rock. Particularly, I show how the famous cathedral of St. Basil the Blessed in Moscow was designed to represent Jerusalem as a city of multiple and diverse churches. In closing I turn to the Western tradition and provide a summary characterization of Gothic architectural icons of the Holy City and compare them to the Byzantine strategies.
Keywords: hierotopy, image-paradigm, Jerusalem, Christianity, iconography, Solomon’s Temple, Byzantium, Holy City, sacred space
References:
Bondarenko 1998 – Bondarenko I. On the origin of the onion shape of church domes. Narodnoe zodchestvo. Petrozavodsk, 1998. P. 105–113. In Russian.
Böhme 2017 – Böhme G. The Aesthetics of Atmospheres. Ed. by Jean-Paul Thibaud. London, 2017.
Kuhnel 1987 – Kuhnel B. From the Earthly to the Heavenly Jerusalem. Representations of the Holy City in Christian Art of the First Millennium. Rome, Freiburg, Vienna, 1987.
Lidov 1998 – Lidov A. Heavenly Jerusalem. The Byzantine Approach. Jewish art. Jerusalem, 1998. P. 340–353.
Lidov 2006 – Lidov A. The Creation of Sacred Spaces as a Form of Creativity and Subject of Cultural History. Hierotopy. Creation of Sacred Spaces in Byzantium and Medieval Russia. Ed. by A. Lidov. Moscow. P. 32–58. In Russian.
Lidov 2009 a – Lidov A. Hierotopy: Spatial Icons and Image-Paradigms in Byzantine Culture. Moscow, 2009. In Russian.
Lidov 2009 b – Lidov Alexei. ‘Image-Paradigms’ as a Category of Mediterranean Visual Culture. A Hierotopic Approach to Art History. Crossing Cultures. Papers of the 32nd International Congress in the History of Art. Melbourne, 2009. P. 148–153.
Lidov 2009 c – New Jerusalems. Hierotopy and Iconography of Sacred Spaces. Ed. by A. Lidov. Moscow, 2009. In Russian.
Lidov 2013 – Lidov A. Icons. The World of Holy Images in Byzantium and Rus. Moscow, 2013. In Russian.
Lidov 2014 – Lidov A. The Temple Veil as a Spatial Icon. Revealing an Image-Paradigm of Medieval Iconography and Hierotopy. IKON. 2014. 7. P. 97–108.
Lidov 2017 a – Lidov A. The Priesthood of the Virgin Mary as an Image-Paradigm of Christian Visual Culture. IKON. 2017. 10. P. 9–26.
Lidov 2017 b – Lidov A. Sacred Waters in Ecclesiastical Space. The Rivers of Paradise as an Image-Paradigm of Byzantine Hierotopy. Holy Water in the Hierotopy and Iconograhy of the Christian World. Ed. by A. Lidov. Moscow, 2017. P 159–183. In Russian.
Melnik 2012 – Melnik A. Who has built the Intercession-on-the-Moat Cathedral in Moscow? Reports of the Rostov Museum. 2012. 19. P. 142–154. In Russian.
Mochulsky 1887 – Mochulsky V. Historical and Literary Analsysis of poetry of ‘Golubinaya kniga’. Warsaw, 1887. In Russian.
Rosenau 1979 – Rosenau H. Vision of the Temple. The image of the Temple of Jerusalem in Judaism and Christianity. London, 1979.
Recht 2008 – Recht R. Believing and seeing. The art of Gothic cathedrals. Chicago, 2008.
Simsky 2013 – Simsky A. The Image-Paradigm of the Fire of God in the Bible and in the Christian Tradition. Hierotopy of Light and Fire in the Culture of the Byzantine World. Ed. by A. Lidov. Moscow, 2013. P. 45–81. In Russian.
Simsky 2016 a – Simsky A. Image-paradigms in Religious Culture. Interdisciplinaryresearches of culture. 2016. 8. P. 36–44. In Russian.
Simsky 2016 b – Simsky A. Image-paradigms in Hierotopy: Ontological and Functional Aspects. Diogenes’ Lantern: The Human Being in Diversity of Practice (International Anthropological Journal). 2016. Vol. 2. P. 355–374. In Russian.
Simsky 2016 c – Simsky A. The Imagery of the Gothic Cathedral: a Hierotopic Approach. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of visual semiotics. 2016. 3 (9). P. 9–24. In Russian.
Simsky 2017 – Simsky A. Image-paradigms in Hierotopy: Sacred Spaces as Communicating Media. Annual conference of the European Association of the Study of Religion EASR-2017. Leuven, 2017. URL: https://www.academia.edu/34663306/Image-paradigms_in_Hierotopy_Sacred_Spaces_as_Communicating_Media
Simsky 2018 – Simsky A. Hierotopy as Principle and Instrument. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of visual semiotics. 2018. 2 (16). P. 62–85. In Russian.
Stookey 1969 – Stookey L. The Gothic Cathedral as the Heavenly Jerusalem: Liturgical and Theological Sources. Gesta. 1969. 8, 1. P. 35–41.
Zagraevsky 2018 – Zagraevsky S. About Scientific Validity of Hierotopy. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of visual semiotics. 2018. 1 (15). P. 49–69. In Russian.
( 1.31 MB ) 
( 1.3 MB )
Issue: 3, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 101 — 113
Downloads: 1537