THE VISUAL (THE ARCHITECTURAL EKPHRASIS) IN OVID’S POEM “METAMORPHOSES”
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2017-4-105-115
The article is devoted to the analysis of visual in the ancient literature, which the researchers consider the forerunner of the development of the visuality of the Renaissance and New Times. The purpose of the article is to study the architectural ekphrasis in Ovid’s poem “Metamorphoses”. The object of the study are descriptions of the palace of Phoebus (Regia Solis) and the Philemon and Baucis hut, converted into a temple (Tectum Philemonis et Baucidis). Ekphrasis Regia Solis, being a translation of the visual code into a verbal one, appears in the text of the poem on the border between the world of people and gods, pointing to a mix of real and unreal life. The image of the architectural object appears gradually, as the young Phaethon approaches the place of sunrise (ortus). The semantics of the word ‘ortus’ allows us to assert that the ekphrastic description not only reconstructs the model of the author’s reality, but also is the beginning, the birth of a new reality. Description of the house of Philemon and Baucis is a folded ekphrasis, does not contain a detailed representation, it is used as a motivation, a generalized image, characteristic of the temples of ancient culture. The architectural ekphrasis appears in the process of metamorphosis and also constructs a new reality. The parameters of this new reality, framed by conditional ekphrasis boundaries, are considered in the article.
Keywords: visual, ekphrasis, Ovid, “Metamorphoses”, ancient literature
References:
Genette 1998 – Genette G. Figures. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 1998.
Osherov 2001 – Osherov S. A. To find the language of the epochs: From archaic Rome to the Russian Silver Age. Moscow, 2001. In Russian.
Ovid 1961 – Ovidii Nasonis Metamorphoses. Ed. by Rudolf Ehwald, E. Rösch. München, 1961.
Puchkov 2008 – Puchkov A. A. Poetics of Ancient Architecture. Kiev, 2008. In Russian.
Rubins 2003 – Rubins M. “Plastic joy of beauty”: Ekphrasis in the creativity of acmeists and the European tradition. St. Petersburg, 2003. In Russian.
Salnikova 2012 – Salnikova E. V. The phenomenon of visuality and the evolution of visual culture. The dissertation author’s abstract on competition of a degree of the doctor of culturology. Moscow, 2012. In Russian.
Shcheglov 2002 – Shcheglov Yu. K. Essay on “Metamorphoses”. St. Petersburg, 2002. In Russian.
Sukhanov 2003 – Sukhanov V. A. The problem of aesthetic reality in the works of G. G. Shpet and M. M. Bakhtin. The creative heritage of Gustav Shpet. Tomsk, 2003. P. 379–386. In Russian.
Taruashvili 1998 – Taruashvili L. I. Tectonics of the visual image in the poetry of Antiquity and Christian Europe: On the question of the cultural and historical premises of order architecture. Moscow, 1998. In Russian.
Uspensky 1995 – Uspensky B. A. Semiotics of Art. Moscow, 1995. In Russian.
Vitruvius 2012 – Vitruvius. De architectura libri decem. Transl. into Russian by F. S. Petrovsky. Moscow, 2012.
Vulikh 1996 – Vulikh N. V. Ovid. Moscow, 1996. In Russian.
( 336.82 kB ) 
( 328.97 kB )
Issue: 4, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 105 — 115
Downloads: 1820