THE IGNORAMUS PARADOX: THE TIME OF VISUAL SYMBOLISM DOMINATION
DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2017-4-49-64
All epochs creates their own symbols which become sociocultural events. These events occur after the visual symbolism, understood and recognized by people of a particular epoch, was expressed in a discursive form. Each sociocultural time characterizes the predominance of either visual symbolism or verbal symbolism but the forthcoming change of the epochs diagnoses the accent transfer from one symbolism to another. The correspondences between actions of three modern technologies – bioethics, urban planning, and cognitive management – are presented in this paper. These correspondences are established here on the basis of the “ignoramus paradox”. The essence of the paradox is the fate of ignoramus is guaranteed to everyone in the society of knowledge. The paradox manifests the situation in which each professional becomes an expert in a single area of knowledge while staying helpless as an ignoramus in all the rest areas but living in modern society requires a special awareness to navigate in a complex reality. These three modern technologies protect an ignoramus: knowledge management protects the intellectual freedom of specialist; urban planning – the rights of urban communities; bioethics – individuality. On basis of information models, the task of knowledge management in urban planning is specified and a role of verbal symbolism of bioethics in finding the “semiotic attractor” of urban planning was established.
Keywords: the “ignoramus paradox”, bioethics’ symbolism, visual symbolism, urban planning, equifinality, heterotopy
References:
Adams 2017 – Adams P. C. Geographies of media and communication II: Arcs of communication. Progress in Human Geography. 2017. April 12. URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309132517702992
Avanesov 2017 – Avanesov S. S. Tomsk: visual constructing of local urban spaces. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2017. 1 (11). P. 41–47. In Russian.
Brenner, Schmid 2014 – Brenner N., Schmid C. The «urban age» in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2014. 38. P. 731–755.
Castells 1984 – Castells M.The city and the grassroots: a cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. Univ. of California Press, 1984.
Davidoff, Davidoff, Gold 1970 – Davidoff P., Davidoff L., Gold N. N. Suburban action: advocate planning for an open society. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1970. 36. P. 12–21.
Fine 2014 – Fine G. A. The Hinge Civil Society, Group Culture, and the Interaction Order. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 77. 1. P. 5–26.
Galonnier 2015 – Galonnier J. The Enclave, the Citadel and the Ghetto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2015. 39. P. 92–111.
Gorbuleva 2017 – Gorbuleva M. S. Visual projections of ethical and law problems in the activity of Russian animal welfare organizations. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2017. 1 (11). P. 76–85. In Russian.
Harvey 2006 – Harvey D.Space of global capitalism. Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development.London. 2006.
Harvey 2008 – Harvey D. The right to the city. The City Reader. 2008. Vol. 6. P. 23–40.
Harvey 2012 – Harvey D. Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution.London. 2012.
Hutchby 2014 – Hutchby I. Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics. 2014. Vol. 72. P. 86–89.
Kipfer, Saberi, Wieditz 2013 – Kipfer S., Saberi P., Wieditz T.Henri Lefebvre: Debates and controversies. Progress in Human Geography. 2013. Vol. 37. 1. P. 115–134.
Korogodin 1991 – Korogodin V. I. Information and the Phenomenon of Life. Pushchino, 1991. In Russian.
McKenna 2016 – McKenna B. The Predatory Pedagogy of «Distance Learning»: Face-to-Face Education in Peril. Anthropology Now. 2016. Vol. 8. 3. P. 71–80.
Melik-Gaykazyan 2006 – Melik-Gaykazyan I. V. Methodology for modeling the relationships of irreversibility, complexity and information processes. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2006. Vol. 5. 2 (20). P. 104–141. In Russian.
Melik-Gaykazyan et al. 2017 – Melik-Gaykazyan I. V., Tarasenko V. F., Mescheryakova T. V., Melik-Gaykazyan M. V.Information model for management in the area of convergent technologies. 29th International Business Information Management Association Conference-Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth. IBIMA 2017. P. 429–434.
Mulligan 2014 – Mulligan G.Regional science at sixty: traditional topics and new directions. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies. 2014. Vol. 20. 1. P. 4–14.
Okulicz-Kozaryn, Mazelis 2016 – Okulicz-Kozaryn A., Mazelis J. M. Urbanism and happiness: A test of Wirth’s theory of urban life. Urban Studies. 2016. May 10. URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0042098016645470
Phillips, Evans, Muirhead 2015 – Phillips, R., Evans, B., Muirhead, S. Curiosity, place and wellbeing: encouraging place-specific curiosity as a ‘way to wellbeing’. Environment and Planning A. 2015. 47. P. 2339–2354.
Sennett 2012 – Sennett R. Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. Yale University Press, 2012.
Sharp 2013 – Sharp D. Street Life: Rebels, Rulers, and the Right to the City. The Arab Studies Journal. 2013. Vol. 21. 1. P. 279–287.
Soja 2000 – Soja E. W. Postmetropolis. Critical studies of cities and regions.Cambridge, 2000.
Soja 2015 – Soja E. Accentuate the regional. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2015. Vol. 39. 2. P. 372–381.
Woo, Webster 2014 – WooY., Webster C. Co-evolution of gated communities and local public goods. Urban Studies. 2014. 51. P. 2539–2554.
Issue: 4, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ARTICLES
Pages: 49 — 64
Downloads: 1539