Praxema TSPU
RU EN






Today: 12.12.2025
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №4 COMPLEX STRUCTURE OF THE «MYTHIC»: DISTINCTION, EXPERIENCE, COMMUNICATION
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Search
  • About Publisher
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Council
  • Regular journal reviewers
  • Information for Authors
  • Peer-reviewing procedure
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Place article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

Journal on the history of ancient pedagogical culture
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

COMPLEX STRUCTURE OF THE «MYTHIC»: DISTINCTION, EXPERIENCE, COMMUNICATION

Osachenko Yulia Stanislavovna

Information About Author:

In this article a question of finding appropriate methodological principles of myth analysis in philosophy is raised. “Mythic” is an ambivalent dynamic phenomenon of culture and a structural unit of consciousness and self-consciousness experience. The distinction’s strategy reveals a complex structural dynamics of myth; it combines post-metaphysical modifications of phenomenology, hermeneutics and semiotics. How to define “Myth” in a variety of theoretical models? The Myth in the article is designed as an ontological structure of consciousness experience and as a transcendental imagination, that is used to open a “prototype of existence” and generate formers of every practice of interpretation of objective reality. Myth is not static category but dynamic principle of understanding. It causes difficulties of identification and explanation of nature and functions of myth. A mythological consciousness is neither a rudiment of primitive phase of phylogenetic development of consciousness, nor a chaotic or irrational production of imagination. The mythological consciousness is specified, first of all, by syncretism, involvement of propositional, normative and expressive meanings of experience. At the second place it is also specified by undifferentiated phenomena of contemplation, experience and thinking. All phenomena are united in discourse and actions. And at the third place it’s specified by absence of critical-reflexive position towards these elements of experience. “Myth” as an experience of understanding and a fact couldn’t be reduced to “Mythology” as a systematization of narratively arranged myths. Different levels of mythological discourse and thinking connected with processes of demythologization and remythologization.

Keywords: myth, mythological consciousness, distinction, experience, communication

References:

Barthes 2003 – Barthes R. Système de la mode. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 2003.

Barthes 2008 – Barthes R. Mythologies. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 2008.

Batrakova 2002 – Batrakova S. P. Art and myth. Moscow, 2002. In Russian.

Berger, Luckmann 1995 – Berger P., Luckmann Т. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on sociology of Knowledge. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 1995.

Baudrillard 2006 – Baudrillard J. La Société de consommation. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 2006.

Chalikova 1991 – Chalikova V. A. Utopia and utopian thinking. Anthology. Moscow, 1991. In Russian.

Chalikova 1992 – Chalikova V. A. Utopia and ideals. London, 1992. In Russian.

Deleuze 1998 – Deleuze G. Différence et répétition. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 1998.

Eliade 2000 – Eliade М. Aspects of the myth. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 2000.

Hübner 1997 – Hübner K. The truth of the myth. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 1997.

Likhachev 1993 – Likhachev S. V. Myth of Tolkien works. Literary Review. 1993. 11/12. P. 91–104. In Russian.

Lotman, Uspensky 1992 – Lotman Yu., Uspensky B. Myth – name – culture. Lotman Yu. М. Selected Articles. Vol. 1. Tallinn, 1992. P. 58–76. In Russian.

Meletinsky 1998 – Meletinsky Е. М. Myth and twentieth century. Meletinsky Е. М. Selected articles. Memories. Moscow, 1998. P. 419–426. In Russian.

Meletinsky 2012 – Meletinsky Е. М. The Poetics of myth. Moscow, 2012. In Russian.

Molchanov 2004 – Molchanov V. I. The distinction and experience: phenomenology of non-aggressive consciousness. Moscow, 2004. In Russian.

Naidysh 2002 – Naidysh V. M. Philosophy of mythology. From Antiquity to the Romantic era. Moscow, 2002. In Russian.

Neklyudov 2000 – Neklyudov S. Yu. Structure and function of myth. Myths and mythology in modern Russia. Moscow, 2000. P. 17–38. In Russian.

Ocachenko 2014 а – Ocachenko Yu. S. Ontological Structure of Mythical Experience: Syncretism as Homogenization of Heterogeneous Elements. Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. 2014. Vol. 12. Is. 2. P. 50–57. In Russian.

Ocachenko 2014 b – Ocachenko Yu. S. Ontological srtucture of mythical experience: the constellation as a dynamic configuration of consciousness. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2014. 2 (26). P. 41–48. In Russian.

Ricœur 2008 – Ricœur P. Le Conflit des interprétations. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 2008.

Romanenko 2000 – Romanenko Yu. M. Philosophy in the reflection of the myth: metaphysics as the poetics of mental images. Metaphysical study. Is. 15. Saint Petersburg, 2000. P. 69–76. In Russian.

Sivertsev 2001 – Sivertsev М. А. Tolkienism as a part of neoreligiosity. Palantir. 2001. 26. P. 5–11. In Russian.

Syrov 2010 – Syrov V. N. Mass Culture: Myths and Reality. Moscow, 2010. In Russian.

Toffler 2002 – Toffler A. Future Shock. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 2002.

Vattimo 2002 – Vattimo G. The Transparent Society. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 2002.

Wunenburger 2000 – Wunenburger J.-J. Principles of mythopoetical imagination. Translation into Russian. Metaphysical study. Is. 15. Saint Petersburg, 2000. P. 51–68.

Zhukova 2010 – Zhukova О. А. About mythological temptations of Russian history and culture. Questions of philosophy. 2010. 4. P. 110–122. In Russian.

Zilberman 1999 – Zilberman D. B. The genesis of meaning in the philosophies of Hinduism. Moscow, 1999. In Russian.

osachenko_y._s._100_117_4_6_2015.pdf ( 329.21 kB ) osachenko_y._s._100_117_4_6_2015.zip ( 318.6 kB )

Issue: 4, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: ARTICLES

Pages: 100 — 117

Downloads: 2345

For citation:


2025 ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU