Praxema TSPU
RU EN






Today: 07.12.2025
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №3 CONTEMPLATION AND COMMUNION: TWO PARADIGMS OF SPIRITUAL PRACTICE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • About Publisher
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Council
  • Regular journal reviewers
  • Information for Authors
  • Peer-reviewing procedure
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Place article
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

Journal on the history of ancient pedagogical culture
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CONTEMPLATION AND COMMUNION: TWO PARADIGMS OF SPIRITUAL PRACTICE

Horujy Sergey Sergeevich

Information About Author:

Comparative analysis of the relation of contemplation and communion as two fundamental activities in the field of religious experience is performed in ontological, theological and historico-philosophical aspects. It is shown that the dominance of one or the other of these activities is the key structural characteristics of spiritual practices and traditions. In the prism of this relation, the relation of hesychasm (including hesychast theology of Divine energies by Palamas) and neoplatonism is reconsidered and new arguments demonstrating the radical divergence of these two spiritual schools are brought forth. The phenomenon of contemplation of the Light of Tabor in the higher stages of hesychast practice is interpreted on the basis of its connection with the event of Transfiguration of Christ as presented in the New Testament. This connection stated by hesychasts and recognized by Councils of Orthodox Church makes it possible to characterize hesychast experience as a special kind of contemplation unknown to Hellenic and other traditions of contemplative mysticism: it is not so much contemplation as communion, which represents here a specific modality of personal being, Personality discovered in Christian experience. I call this contemplation the “contemplation in the image and likeness of Transfiguration” and describe it briefly.

Keywords: hesychasm, neoplatonism, communion, contemplation, personality, Transfiguration, Light of Tabor

References:

Govorun 2014 – Kirill (Govorun), archim.Lost in Translation: reading Tradition in the postmodern era. Tradition and translation. Assumption’s Reading. Kiev, 2014. P. 83–91. In Russian.

Gregory Palamas 1995 – st. Gregory Palamas. Triads for the defense of those who practice sacred quietude. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 1995.

Hadot 1991 – Hadot P. Plotin ou la simplicité du regard. Translation into Russian. Moscow, 1991.

Horujy 2011 – Horujy S. S. Actual problems of studying hesychasm. Proceedings of the Kiev Theological Academy. 2011. 15. P. 41–62. In Russian.

Horujy 2012 а – Horujy S. S. Actual problems of studying hesychasm.Horujy S.S.Research on hesychast tradition. Vol. 2. Saint-Petersburg, 2012. P. 416–444. In Russian.

Horujy 2012 b – Horujy S. S. On schools of mysticism and culture of debate. Questions of philosophy. 2012. 8. P. 166–176. In Russian.

Horujy 2013 – Horujy S. S. Plotin’s Light and the Light of Thabor: the Mystics of Light in Neo-Platonism and Hesychasm. Hierotopy of Light and Fire in the Culture of the Byzantine World. Ed. by А. М. Lidov. Moscow, 2013. P. 37–44. In Russian.

Macarius 2002 – St.Macarius of Egypt. Spiritual words and epistle. Collection of Type I (Vatic. graec. 694). Translation into Russian. Ed. by А. G. Dunaev. Moscow, 2002.

Meyendorff  1997 – Meyendorff  I.,protopresbyter. The life and works of st. Gregory Palamas. Prolegomena. Saint-Petersburg, 1997. In Russian.

Plotin 1995 – Plotin. Works. Saint-Petersburg, 1995. Translation into Russian.

Reutin 2011 а – Reutin M. Yu. Mystical Theology of Meister Eckhart: the tradition of Plato’s «Parmenides» in the late Middle Ages. Moscow, 2011. In Russian.

Reutin 2011 b – Reutin M. Yu. «Christian Platonism» in XIV century: experience of comparative study of the theological doctrines of Eckhart and John Gregory Palamas. Paris disputation of John Eckhart. Moscow, 2011. In Russian.

Sophrony 1991 – Sophrony Sakharov, archim. Staretz Silouan. Moscow, 1991. In Russian.

Ware 1977 – Ware Kallistos, archim. The Debate about Palamism. Eastern Churches Review. 1977. Vol. IX.

Williams 1977 – Williams R. D. The Philosophical Structures of Palamism. Eastern Churches Review. 1977. Vol. IX.

horuzhiy_s._s._11_27_3_5_2015.pdf ( 352.2 kB ) horuzhiy_s._s._11_27_3_5_2015.zip ( 342.12 kB )

Issue: 3, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: RESEARCH REPORTS

Pages: 11 — 27

Downloads: 1985

For citation:


© 2025 ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU